Reasons why Princess Diana had to go

Very true just as many people believed Elvis did not die on his toilet in the seventies or that we never went to the moon or that the Earth is flat.

Unfortunately the evidence proves otherwise

 

Yes.
Henri Paul seems like a convenient patsy.
[Bold emphasis below mine.]


http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/10445/Diana

DIANA'S DRIVER WAS NOT DRUNK

Tuesday June 19,2007
By John Chapman

THE inquest into Princess Diana’s death was last night plunged into fresh controversy.
It emerged that so called evidence against her chauffeur is flawed and unreliable.

Henri Paul’s “heavy drinking” has always been blamed for the crash which took place in a Paris tunnel in 1997.

But this key argument in exp-laining the deaths of Diana and her lover Dodi Fayed as an accident is about to be blown apart.

Agents from Britain’s MI5 and French intelligence have been linked to Diana’s death and the question now being asked is: “Were blood samples from Mr Paul swapped to make it appear that he was responsible for the crash?”

Gaping holes in the evidence against Mr Paul have already been acknowledged by new coroner Lord Justice Scott Baker.

He said at a hearing last week: “I have some sympathy for the position of Henri Paul’s family, from what I have read so far. There are obviously some serious question marks there.”

Mr Paul’s parents have always maintained he was not an alcoholic and took his responsibilities as a driver seriously.
Sources close to the inquest have told the Daily Express that the blood tests which showed Mr Paul was drunk are not fit to be used as evidence and should be ruled as inadmissible. There is also a continuing court case in France against two medical experts who made serious mistakes in taking and analysing blood samples.

Both have refused to attend the Diana inquest which opens on October 2.

Toxicologist Dr Gilbert Pepin and forensic pathologist Dominique Lecomte are accused of performing the tests so badly it will be impossible to claim that Mr Paul was drunk at the time of the crash.

Michael Mansfield QC, representing Dodi’s father, Harrods boss Mohamed Al Fayed, has already told a pre-inquest hearing: “We need to know how those errors came to be made. There may be a sinister aspect.”

Sources last night told the Daily Express: “This issue will not be swept under the carpet.

“Where is the proof that Henri Paul was drunk on that terrible night? There is no doubt the tests were flawed and the judge now says there are serious question marks.

“Why are the two French experts, whose role is so important, refusing to give evidence? What have they got to hide?
“On that terrible night, when Diana and Dodi died, something sinister happened later in the mortuary to make a murder look like a simple traffic accident. The truth must be uncovered.”

French officials, the Daily Express has learned over a lengthy investigation, have compromised all the initial evidence.

It is feared blood samples which are said to prove that Mr Paul was high on drink and drugs may in fact belong to someone not connected to the crash. When Mr Paul’s body was transferred to the Place Mazas mortuary following the crash in August 1997, there were at least 24 other bodies there.

Lecomte worked through the night on the case at the Pitie Salpetriere hospital in Paris.

She then went to the city’s Medical Legal Institute to examine and report on Dodi and Mr Paul’s bodies.

But she faces severe criticism for a number of lapses, including:

Allowing blood samples taken from Mr Paul’s body to remain in an unguarded refrigerator for 24 hours,

Allowing samples to be stored alongside others belonging to different people,

Not taking DNA samples from Paul which would prove the blood was his.

Reports by Lecomte, France’s most senior pathologist, and Dr Pepin, who tested Mr Paul’s blood, were central to the initial finding that the deaths were a simple road accident caused by a drink-driver.

Mr Paul was said to be more than three times over the legal drink limit when the Mercedes he was driving crashed into the underpass in Paris.

Doubts over the veracity of the blood tests have led the French courts to examine the role of Lecomte and Pepin.
It now makes it impossible for investigators to say with certainty that Diana and Dodi died in a simple road accident and adds weight to claims of a cover-up.

Lecomte testified on oath that she took just three blood samples from Paul. But a log book shows five samples were taken, suggesting extra samples may have been wrongly attributed to Mr Paul.

Pepin’s findings claimed that Mr Paul had 174 milligrams of alcohol per 100 millilitres of blood – more than three times the French legal drink-dive limit.

The current drink-drive limit in the UK is 80mg of alcohol per 100ml of blood. In France the limit is 50mg per 100ml of blood.

But a second blood test gives widely differing readings for the amount of alcohol in Mr Paul’s blood.

It is also alleged that blood samples from a suicide victim could have been swapped with Mr Paul’s on the orders of the security services.

This would explain why the readings found in the chauffeur’s blood were so extraordinary. Tests showed such high levels of carbon monoxide that Paul would have been unable to stand, let alone drive.

The new evidence was given to Operation Paget, the £4million British inquiry into Diana’s death led by former Met Police Comm-issioner Lord Stevens. But Lord Stevens declared he was “satisfied” with the original findings. Questions also remain over Mr Paul’s connection with the French intelligence services.

The driver was an informer for the French secret service and police. But Lord Stevens said this was only at a very “low level” and Paul was not paid for his information.

Lord Stevens also denied that MI6 had been in contact with Paul. He said he found that no agent had ever met or communicated with Paul and that MI6 did not have a file on him.

But the question remains: If Mr Paul was only such a “low level” unpaid operative, why did his bank accounts reveal that he had amassed more than £100,000?

Mr Mansfield has warned that Operation Paget throws up a number of such questions that the inquest must answer.

 

I suspect that would have been a gross overstatement. I guess it might have been possible to get such a result if a poll were taken of those who were camped for days around royal buildings in fawning disbelief that the saintly wonderfulness of glorious Diana, who had been so cruelly and evilly treated by those horrible, evil royals who must have wanted her erased from existence because her glory so marvelously outshone them, was gone. I strongly suspect that the vast majority of Brits, though, were not among that number, and had a slightly more realistic view of the whole situation of her death, and life!

 

Unfortunately since this story appeared others have appeared showing that the blood samples which were tested for alcohol content were also subjected to DNA testing which confirmed that it was in fact Mr. Pauls blood.

In addition further tests were run proving that in fact he was way over the legal limit

 

It is interesting Makedde and it does makes you wonder. To the other poster, the driver was killed, he was the one supposedly drunk. The bodyguard in the front seat survived but of course he remembers nothing.

Have there been any other deadly accidents with a VIP being chauffered around by car in history, ruling out a direct attack by guns, missiles, mob, etc, etc.?

 

the truth is out. It ain't that hard to grasp. She died in a normal run of the mill accident. You make me laugh.

 

There's proof. ha ha

 

I think that she wasn't interesting at all. I think people have decided that they have to love her because they think she was purdy. I could give a rats ass about her. Where were her kids while she was out jet setting around with Dodi? If that was his name. I don't have an issue with the queen. She seems ok to me. I don't have an issue with Charles either. He does charity stuff too. I think the whole royal thing is a bit out dated but then look at the pols. They aren't much fun to watch either. But the idea you have to like her vs. him is silly. They are just people. She had good points and bad points just like Charles. To me it's like arguing over soap opera stars. Not consequential

 

You are welcome to believe what you like, but many of us believe different.

 

To date, not one official or independent investigation has uncovered any evidence of Diana's death being caused by anything other than an auto crash.

 

You believe or speculate? It is far fetched. I mean look at all you would have to do to make this happen. An accidental drowning of something would be so much easier. Why so elaberate? And look at all that could go wrong in a murder plan like this. It would be ridiculous.

 

I guess you're unclear on the concept of the cover-up.

Those that assassinate tend to lie about it afterward. It goes hand in hand.

 

Much has gone wrong in murder plans.

For example, in 1972 an assassination attempt on US governor George Wallace failed and he spent the rest of his life in a wheelchair.

For example, French President Charles DuGaulle survived several assassination attempts; the most famous is that of 22 August 1962, when he and his wife narrowly escaped an assassination attempt when their Citroën DS was targeted by machine gun fire arranged by Colonel Jean-Marie Bastien-Thiry at the Petit-Clamart.

 

Just because nothing has been uncovered, doesn't mean it wasn't murder. I have waited patiently for 14 years, I am happy to wait 14 more years for the evidence.

 

What happens year 15?

 

What do you mean what happens? I am happy to wait as long as it takes for the Royal Family to be arrested and charged for the murder of Princess Diana.

 

You'll be ice skating in hades before that happens.

 

Look, We all know Elvis was behind it. My dog told me.

 

Well said.
It's a shame that those who thought/think her so 'saintly' conveniently overlook the fact of her many lovers and the broken marriage she caused.

 

Yes it has been proven beyond a shadow of reasonable doubt by Vincent Bugiousi that Kennedy was killed by a long communist assassin named Lee Harvey Oswald and Diana died because their driver was drunk.

 

Probably, but I am still happy to wait. I never agreed with the official verdict and I still don't.

 

Incorrect diagnosis doctor.

 

Please reference the actual story/stories and link to it/them if online.

 

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fCBGvN-4eko"]Well, obviously it was a Conspiracy.....[/ame]

 

I have never seen this before lmao..it really does make it sound way to far fetched

even though I still have belief that something was not right..not sure what but I do not believe it was a pure accident.