Discussion in 'Law & Justice' started by Landcover, Jun 15, 2017.
BTW, I've reported you to the authorities.
Thanks for giving us a heads up. Now the police will be watching you, and now you can NOT harm any children.
Sex is not damaging, your perception of sex is damaging not action itself. You perceive it as something disgusting, and that makes harm to children.
The experts in the field of child psychology say it is harmful to a child's psyche, and it is obviously, and if you have ever known a person who has been sexually molested as a child, then it is obvious that it does a LOT of damage. I have a friend who was molested, and she is a mess still to this day, and that was well over 25 years ago!
Voluntary Acquiescence to the proposal of another; the act or result of reaching an accord; a concurrence of minds; actualwillingness that an act or an infringement of an interest shall occur.
Consent is an act of reason and deliberation. A person who possesses and exercises sufficient mental capacity to make anintelligent decision demonstrates consent by performing an act recommended by another. Consent assumes a physicalpower to act and a reflective, determined, and unencumbered exertion of these powers. It is an act unaffected by Fraud,duress, or sometimes even mistake when these factors are not the reason for the consent. Consent is implied in everyagreement.
Parties who terminate litigation pursuant to a consent judgment agree to the terms of a decision that is entered into the courtrecord subsequent to its approval by the court.
In the context of rape, submission due to apprehension or terror is not real consent. There must be a choice betweenresistance and acquiescence. If a woman resists to the point where additional resistance would be futile or until herresistance is forcibly overcome, submission thereafter is not consent.
A child’s permission does not equal legal consent
Even if a child or underage teen gives permission or acts willingly, this never implies consent. A child is never accountable. A child’s permission or even request to play a sexual touching or watching game never excuses the adult or teen from taking full responsibility for the interaction.
It is always the adult’s responsibility to set boundaries with children and underage teens. Sometimes people justify their sexual activity with children by saying the child “wanted” to or the child touched them first. They may misread a child’s affection as sexual. They may tell themselves “Age is just a number” or “S/he looks and acts older so it’s okay.” If someone you know is unclear about boundaries with children, remind them of their responsibility to set boundaries and the potentially high consequences to them if they don’t.
Recognise anyones arguments!
So, I think this thread has shown that child predators cannot be trusted to do the "right thing." They will justify their sickness in any way that they can, and try to convince others that it is "not wrong" to have sex with children. THIS is why we need to start giving them the death penalty. These people are sick and beyond repair.
I never post about assaulting kids and I'm not a scumbag, it's another insult from you. I will not report you every time, I did it just once so you can cool down. Can you?
Either she was raped and abused, or brainwashed by social taboos.
Do you actually think a parent would agree to allow you to have sex with their children because you say it is not harmful to them? Are you KIDDING?
Okay lets change word consent for permission, may be I was wrong using definition from Wiktionary. Now I will be using word "permission" is it okay?
They have to. Their morals harm children, not action itself as I already proved. So we have to push parents to change their moral values in order to safe children.
If you wish to discuss a Legal age of Permission, however such a thing does not exist and I have no interest in debating it with you.
Permission is irrelevant, only consent is relevant.
You haven't proved anything at all. All of you've done is talked about how you think it's okay to sex up the kiddies when it has been explained to you numerous times that is most certainly IS harmful. Trained experts in the field say that it is. They have done numerous studies on these children and studied them very closely. You are just a loser on the internet who has no credentials. You are a pedophile and the scummiest life form on earth so of course you would justify it.
Most people frown on adult freaks buggering their kids. But I think you've got a great plan, changing the morals of society, one anonymously typed internet post at a time
You consistently wish to discuss morals despite you saying you have no time for them. Now you wish to debate permission. Neither are relevant to changing legal consent. Why do you now waste your time when I have shown you to be wrong about legal consent. If you are looking for justification there is none, a child can never give you legal consent for sex. End off.
Alright this thread is being locked until further notice. Staff will discuss the contents of this thread and determine the appropriate action going forward.
Separate names with a comma.