Republicans won't let Benghazi go . . .

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Phoebe Bump, Jan 17, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. bwk

    bwk Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2012
    Messages:
    23,837
    Likes Received:
    2,223
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Take it up with the "BIPARTISAN" committee. They came to that conclusion.


    Bush had intelligence there might be an attack somewhere. It doesn't matter where right?
     
  2. Unifier

    Unifier New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2010
    Messages:
    14,479
    Likes Received:
    531
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Considering that Democrats won't even acknowledge it, I'd say that makes us about even, wouldn't you?
     
  3. goober

    goober New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    6,057
    Likes Received:
    48
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You didn't answer his question, because you can't, so you tried to change the subject...
     
  4. bwk

    bwk Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2012
    Messages:
    23,837
    Likes Received:
    2,223
    Trophy Points:
    113
    We'll, since you can't prove he's Kenyan, he can't go to prison now can he? You would be imprisoning the wrong guy. You have to prove he's Kenyan first.
     
  5. bwk

    bwk Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2012
    Messages:
    23,837
    Likes Received:
    2,223
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This is true. I recant my previous statement. Tell the right to please proceed.
     
  6. bwk

    bwk Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2012
    Messages:
    23,837
    Likes Received:
    2,223
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The truth is they read what they wanted to read and left out the rest. Benghazi, still funny stuff!
     
  7. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    How 'bipartisan' were they?

    And there had been 'intel' that they might strike 'somewhere' since 1997
     
  8. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    93,875
    Likes Received:
    14,969
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Seriously, no one can say Senate and Intelligence in the same sentence, it is an oxymoron.
     
  9. bwk

    bwk Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2012
    Messages:
    23,837
    Likes Received:
    2,223
    Trophy Points:
    113
     
  10. banchie

    banchie New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2013
    Messages:
    2,219
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You could be dead wrong couldn't you?


    Muslim Protests Against Cartoons Spread
    http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/07/international/middleeast/07cartoon.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

    Protests over anti-Islam film and Muhammad cartoons - as it happened
    http://www.theguardian.com/world/mi.../21/tension-anti-islam-film-muhammad-cartoons

    No let-up in protests over anti-Islam film
    http://www.cnn.com/2012/09/17/world/film-protests/
     
  11. banchie

    banchie New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2013
    Messages:
    2,219
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    lol! Seems you are Wrong again.

    December 2, 1959: Their intention was to use the aircraft in a bombing of Government buildings in Rio de Janeiro,

    November 10, 1972 hijackers threatened to fly the plane into the nuclear reactor at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory

    June 20, 1979 During the hijacking, Kavaja demanded and received another airplane with the intent of crashing it into the headquarters of the Yugoslav Communist Party.

    January 11, 1987 Muslim hijacker that wanted to crash into the White House

    December 24, 1994 hijackers planning to crash into the Eiffel Tower

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_aircraft_hijackings
     
  12. banchie

    banchie New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2013
    Messages:
    2,219
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
  13. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    <sigh> seems I'm NOT wrong 5 instances in 35 years doesn't make a trend...

    - - - Updated - - -

    He needed a lot more than your truther hindsight...
     
  14. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Not even close,truther.....try harder next time
     
  15. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    93,875
    Likes Received:
    14,969
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Who was wrong?
     
  16. Iriemon

    Iriemon Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2009
    Messages:
    82,348
    Likes Received:
    2,656
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why are you dodging this question?
     
  17. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'm not.....Why would you think that?
     
  18. Iriemon

    Iriemon Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2009
    Messages:
    82,348
    Likes Received:
    2,656
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I get that impression when you don't write an answer. Why are you dodging the question?
     
  19. bwk

    bwk Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2012
    Messages:
    23,837
    Likes Received:
    2,223
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That question will never be answered. Only questions to keep the non-scandal going will be answered. Not the one's that kill it.
     
  20. 1wiseguy

    1wiseguy New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2013
    Messages:
    3,494
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    0
    They got their update from Clinton....
     
  21. 1wiseguy

    1wiseguy New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2013
    Messages:
    3,494
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Who you talking to? I gave my direct answer that showed Purdy to be a fool--- there was no change in subject by me.... and no one answered my question....I wonder why?
     
  22. 1wiseguy

    1wiseguy New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2013
    Messages:
    3,494
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Give it up. It was already testified that the lack of security was not a funding issue. You Oppressives are quickly sinking from low information voters to NO information voters.
     
  23. 1wiseguy

    1wiseguy New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2013
    Messages:
    3,494
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    0
    And its gotten worse ever since! :roflol:
     
  24. rexob715

    rexob715 New Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2012
    Messages:
    2,390
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    But it was a lack of funding. Gerald Connolly explicitedly addressing the funding in this video at about 50mins: http://www.c-span.org/video/?315089-1/benghazi-consulate-attack

    The republicans are trying to SAY it wasn't about money, but Connolly lists the security spending cuts and they total into the millions.
     
  25. TRFjr

    TRFjr Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2013
    Messages:
    17,176
    Likes Received:
    8,667
    Trophy Points:
    113
    In testimony Wednesday before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Charlene Lamb, a deputy assistant secretary of state for diplomatic security, was asked, “Was there any budget consideration and lack of budget which led you not to increase the number of people in the security force there?”

    Lamb responded, “No, sir.”

    http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...e-for-benghazi-attack-as-biden-suggested.html

    so who should I believe a democrat congress man with a political agenda or the actual person a deputy that is in charge of diplomatic security
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page