Research paper concludes vaccine 98 times worse than virus

Discussion in 'Coronavirus Pandemic Discussions' started by kazenatsu, Sep 14, 2022.

PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening. We urge you to seek reliable alternate sources to verify information you read in this forum.

  1. kazenatsu

    kazenatsu Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2017
    Messages:
    34,316
    Likes Received:
    11,051
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This is just the assessment of in one research paper. You can take this with a grain of salt. There are other people who hold other opinions. But it is based on an assessment of the data.

    “Ethically Unjustifiable” – Scientists from Harvard & Johns Hopkins Found Covid-19 Vaccines 98 Times Worse Than the Virus

    University booster mandates were deemed unethical by the researchers for the following reasons:
    • no formal risk-benefit assessment exists for this age group;
    • vaccine mandates may result in a net expected harm to individual young people;
    • mandates are not proportionate: expected harms are not outweighed by public health benefits given the modest and transient effectiveness of vaccines against transmission;
    • US mandates violate the reciprocity principle because rare serious vaccine-related harms will not be reliably compensated due to gaps in current vaccine injury schemes; and
    • mandates create wider social harms. We consider counter-arguments such as a desire for socialization and safety and show that such arguments lack scientific and/or ethical support.
    The study concludes:
    Based on public data provided by the CDC, we estimate that approximately 22,000 to 30,000 previous uninfected young adults ages 18–29 years must be boosted with an mRNA vaccine to prevent one Covid-19 hospitalisation. Given the fact that this estimate does not take into account the protection conferred by prior infection nor a risk-adjustment for comorbidity status this should be considered a conservative and optimistic assessment of benefit.
    Our estimate shows that university Covid-19 vaccine mandates are likely to cause net expected harms to young healthy adults—between 18 and 98 serious adverse events requiring hospitalisation and 1373 to 3234 disruptions of daily activities—that is not outweighed by a proportionate public health benefit.

    "Ethically Unjustifiable" - Scientists from Harvard & Johns Hopkins Found Covid-19 Vaccines 98 Times Worse Than the Virus (thegatewaypundit.com)
     
  2. UntilNextTime

    UntilNextTime Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2022
    Messages:
    7,949
    Likes Received:
    3,064
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Shouldn't the above research paper cover the majority, and not just those attending Universities?
     
  3. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    22,584
    Likes Received:
    11,684
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think LTC Teresa Long concluded the same thing for the military by way of DMED. The shots are more harmful than the virus. This study shows she's right.

    Naturally the military said DMED was wrong. CYA is how the military operates.
     

Share This Page