Residents and Doctors from Douma say chemical attack was staged

A US reporter, Pearson Sharp, reports that the residents of Douma say the chemical attack was staged. All the doctors said the same thing.

A German reporter Uli Gack says the same thing.

https://www.almasdarnews.com/articl...-told-him-chemical-weapons-attack-was-staged/

When they found the boy from the staged video ... he suffered no injuries and participated in the staged video for (rice, dates and cookies).

https://southfront.org/syrian-war-r...-in-staged-video-of-chemical-attack-in-douma/

Our MSM (except for Tucker Carlson of Fox), intelligence "experts", and political pundits are once again ...a joke.

What a bunch of clowns. How many times does this have to happen for people to figure out that we live in a propaganda bubble ?

 

LOL....Pearson Sharp....the same guy who studied English and get this, "creative writing" in college!
He says the chemical attack was staged.....yeah, to every Russian apologist on the planet. The dead and dying victims don't count though....they mess up the "false flag" propaganda!

 

What else do you think Journalists should study ? Regardless - your implicit claim that a this US reporter who actually went to Douma, and has reported that the residents claim that the chemical attack was staged by rebels - is LYING - is preposterous nonsense.

What dead and dying victims ?- these claims were based on reports from the rebels- the people who staged the chemical attack. The doctors do not report any "dead and dying victims". Where are these victims - what are their names .. where are the ones who were wounded but survived - giving their accounts ?

Where is your capacity for logic and reason ? Where are the reporters from CNN showing these dead and dying bodies if they exist ?

Then you have the German Reporter - who also went to Douma - reporting exactly the same thing (not that you read any of the links) from a camp of 20,000 former residents of Douma.

Then you have the boy featured in the staged video - alive and well and saying that he agreed to do the video on the basis of receiving food (rice, dates, cookies).

Regardless... let us go with your fantastical premise that all these reporters are Lying ... that there really was a chemical attack and that these reporters know there was a chemical attack but are intentionally lying for some unknown reason.

Where is the MSM coverage of these stories ? They should be interviewing these people and calling them out on their lies - or at least showing evidence to the contrary.

The problem is -- there is no valid evidence to the contrary.

 

Syria war: Locals bury chemical attack victims in Douma to preserve ...
https://www.express.co.uk › News › World 2 days ago - THE bodies of Douma gas victims have been secretly buried as Syrians desperately try to preserve chemical evidence against the regime of Syria’s President Bashar Assad, it has emerged. ... The United States, United Kingdom and France carried out joint air strikes on Syria after they ...>>

 

https://www.rt.com/news/424280-russia-evidence-chemical-attack-staged/

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-04-15/take-red-pill-history-syrian-false-flags-exposed



Gas "attack" - total FAKE.

 

'RT news'....total FAKE....Russian propaganda for the mentally ill-equipped!

 

Your link is about "Royal Baby Arrives" so .. no comment. I would hope at minimum there would be reporters on the ground.

 

No its not. RT articles are mostly from the US sources ... reporters, politicians and so on. You are just making stuff up.

Obviously you do not read RT with any regularity. There is far more news on RT and any of the US mainstream networks.

 

@Giftedone: another pertinent question would be ..... where are those White Helmets that made these videos and accusations?

As Robert Fisk noted in his story for The Independent, they got on the busses with the rebels and went to Idlib. Funny that, huh?

 

It is not like it is even some big secret that the white helmets are Al Qaeda. There are pics of these folks waiving Al Qaeda flags along side their terrorist brethren.

What is particularly disturbing is that a documentary on these folks - funded by US interests- was glibly and unabashadly created propaganda in relation to the "white helmets" and disseminated it on the US public. Obviously this was done in conjunction with the CIA who now is allowed (since 2013) to create and disseminate propaganda.

 

No chance something like that was staged, right? No, it's only when something happens that does not favor Assad and Russia that it's obviously staged.

You people!

 

Heather Nauert at State Department briefing the other day. Video at link.

https://www.rt.com/usa/424717-us-pay-white-helmets-syria/

We recognize and appreciate and are very grateful for all the work that the White Helmets continues to do on behalf of the people of their country and on behalf of the US Government and all the coalition forces. They're doing incredible work in rescuing in some cases, and in other cases it's recovery efforts. They're an incredible group of individuals," she said.

Moreover, she said she "just exchanged emails with them the other day." Finally cornered into giving a direct answer, she said "As far as I'm aware, all of the work still continues. Peoples' bills are still being paid."

 

What is your problem... quit attacking the messenger. It is not like you have not been on this site long enough to know what ad hom fallacy is.

These are not "Russian or Syrian" reporters that are saying the chemical attack was staged ... did you even bother to read the links ? This was a US reporter and an unrelated German reporter going to interview the people of Douma who are saying the attack was staged - incluatding doctors.

Regardless of what happened .. Where is the other side of the story in our MSM ? Do you not see this as a massive problem ?

Talk about one sided journalism like what one finds in a propaganda state.

I want to hear both sides of the story .. not some nonsensical editorializing from clown puppets repeating the Establishment false narrative.

Are you that blinded that you ingest everything from this propaganda machine without question ?

Any informed objective observer should be able to come up with 5 or 6 false narrative, lies, or omission examples without resorting to google.

Why would you take anything out of the mouths of these proven liars at face value ?

 

Pearson Sharp= notorious liar

https://www.mediamatters.org/people/pearson-sharp

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_America_News_Network


right-wing conspiratorial news

 

Notorious liars are some of the tools Russian apologists, trolls and toadies use as exemplars for their arguments in defense of the war criminal Assad and his Kremlin enablers!

 

No.. that would be you who is making false claims. Nothing in your link states that Sharp has told a lie - never mind being a notorious liar.

 

Sharp peddles conspiracy theories.

he's an anti-American tool.

 

No ... that would be you. Folks that support an Establishment class that is running this nation into the ground.

You are so hell bent on fallacy and demonization that you failed to notice that the report done by One America News was "Courtesy of Fox" news.

That you then make the nonsensical fallacious illogical leap by labeling those who reported on the Seth Rich death "anti American" showing how desperate you are to sink into mindless nonsense and ad hom fallacy rather than addressing the message.

If you do not believe the Reporting by German and US reporters on the ground in Syria and think they are making up Lies ... Fine.

Where is your "evidence" to the contrary.

 

YOU CITED MEDIA MATTERS TO PROVE SOMEONE WRONG???

Dude

That's the alt left liberal propaganda network!

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/media-matters/

Dude if you're going to try and prove someone wrong, at LEAST don't do it by citing the opposite sides bullshit.

 

"alt-left" is a made up Fake News term created by butthurt RWers

 

LOL dude- you are trying to prove someone wrong by doing the same thing they did?
Media Matters is for radicals.

 

lol and what does the RW have to be butthurt about? We won by a landslide

 

Carlson seems to be the only person in MSM, and I consider FOX to be a part of MSM, and just leans right instead of left, that has the moral fortitude to do what journalists should all do, and that is to question the official narrative. And to point out when that narrative seems nonsensical.

Of course it may be purely coincidental that these gas attacks blamed on assad are always timed to occur at critical times for assad. With this one here, this last one, we even had a heads up that one was being planned a week or more before it actually happened. And that it was another false flag, to hurt assad and his fight to take back syria from radical islam. Boy these coincidences surely are growing in being so coincidental. Nothing to see here, move along as they say. ha ha.

And never do you see MSM mention that the opposition to assad have made chemical weapons, for if you are pushing the official story, one must never bring up the fact that some of these radicals have made these chemicals. Very convenient to not inform the public of reality given americans tend to develop amnesia shortly after an inconvenient facts arises. ha ha.