Roy Moore's lawyer casts doubt on accuser's story, yearbook inscription

Washington (CNN)Former Judge Roy Moore continues to deny allegations of sexual abuse against him, his attorney Phillip L. Jauregui said at a news conference Wednesday, during which he attempted to cast doubt on the story of one of Moore's accusers.

Jauregui specifically focused on pushing back on the accusation from Beverly Young Nelson, 56, who said on Monday that Moore sexually assaulted her when she was 16 years old. Jauregui took issue with the statements of Nelson and her attorney Gloria Allred, saying Nelson falsely claimed that she never spoke to Moore again after the time of her alleged assault.

Woman accuses Moore of sexually assaulting her at 16
"As it turns out, in 1999, Ms. Nelson filed a divorce action against her then-husband, Mr. Harris," Jauregui said. "Guess who that case was before? It was filed in Etowah County, and the judge assigned was Roy S. Moore, circuit judge of Etowah County. There was contact."
The nature of the divorce case that the Moore campaign raised is unclear, and Jauregui did not elaborate on how much Moore himself was involved.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/15/politics/roy-moore-alabama-senate/index.html

It, specifically, is that yearbook that is why I 100% reversed my opinion including on this forum to believing Moore is guilty.

BUT now I question that. First, she claimed she NEVER saw Moore again after the supposed "tried to rape me when I was 16." Actually, he presided over her divorce trial.

The signature with the notation "D.A." is identical to what is on the divorce court papers with Moore's signature - BUT the D.A. is the name of his clerk at the time who would write "D.A." indicating she is who stamped the legal documents.





Unless the original yearbook is released to a neutral handwriting expert I will conclude that at least part of it is a fraud. It is notable that the woman allowed NO questions and only read a statement clearly written by the lawyer, not her.

I recall with President Trump, many of the accusations were proven false or other women present at the same time claimed it was a lie. The response of Democrats was unless it can be proven all are false then we must presume Trump is guilty under their presumption of guilt philosophy. I don't buy that.

 

Two more women came out today withTHEIR expereinces.

Would that many woemn "consprie" against him?? And what is theri real motive??

And why was he restricted fro m a amall at one time........when word was that he was cruising young girls.??

Is HIS denial the only valid statement?? If there is smoke....is there fire??

Or is it HE said vs THEY said??

Not sure it matters all that much anymore...... as if a person aka self confessed ) crotch grabber can get to be Prez.......the entire standards and expectations of public service people has been reduced so low .......that it is as if no standards,ethics let alone "morals" are the new norm. Meanwhile the lawyers get a lot of publicity.

This is how the Roman Empire decayed too. Will the American Empire follow suit?? or do a serious correction??

 

Yeah, I bet in your mind the fact that your ilk let accused rapist get to be a president has nothing to do with these new "morals". But then when your ilk defended an accused rapist president they did not think that far ahead, did they?

 

If it was ONE lady or even two........, it might be easier to create "reasonable" doubt..........but the number is higher now.....


Wealthy and powerful men have a history of sexual misconduct........ but the women have been too easily intimidated by them to speak out. Things are starting to change now......It might be the beginning of a societal shift.

 

The women may not know each other but clearly someone is pulling their string

Roy moore has a oress onference to deny the authenticty of the yearbook and within minutes two more attackers show up

That sort of timing is planned by a political oppertative who is directly these women

 

Oh, this country is headed down the same road as Rome, but it's not because of Trump. People like you are more responsible for the decline when you continue to lie about Trumps crotch grabbing statement. Morals dropped like a rock under the president who vowed to fundamentally change this country. He didn't say for the better.

What that picture doesn't show is that two colors of ink were used. Sounds to me like she took Moore's signature from her divorce decree and tried to copy some of it to the yearbook. Little did she know what the D.A. stood for.

 

Moore said he would sue the women.. That would subject the yearbook to discovery.. which I doubt Moore would welcome.. Also.. his future wife is also in that same yearbook.

 

Howard Stern has posted 15 hours of Trump's sex talk and sexual bragging...

A lawsuit brought by Moore subjects the yearbook to discovery.

 

Does any of those 15 hours have Trump admit to grabbing p***y?

 

If you think moore is lying then allred should release the yearbook for expert examination

Then you will have him

 

Yes..........

 

His wife doesn't count.

 

P***y grabbing, draft dodging, how sexy he thinks his daughter is, his whole sorted, bizarre, perverted, lifestyle.

 

They probably have a word for when someone throws a few truths in to make their lies more believable.
I bet his lifestyle isn't any worse than many powerful Democrats, Billy and Teddy boys for two.

 

I doubt it.

Then surely it is passing strange that his attorney demanded just that.

 

They do, Trumpistic.

 

All but two of the "accusers" are not accusations of misconduct whatsoever. For example, an 18 year claims he asked her out on a date. So what? Legal age is legal age. So that is nothing. Curiously, no female - even legal - has claimed he had sex with her. So whether he asked 3,5, 10, 30 16+ year olds out on dates? That is NOTHING.

Yeah, a lot of teenage girls would find it creepy for a 32 year old guy to ask them out on a date. So? There is the saying that on his 30th birthday, a man becomes invisible to teenage girls. So most would say no and maybe see it as creepy. Its not illegal and not creepy if she wants to go on a date with him.

The ONLY two accusations with ANY merit are 1.) claim that he groped a 14 year old. She has never publicly said so and it only hearsay from a Democrat reporter. 2.) the woman who did appear reading a script clearly written by the NY feminist lawyer standing with her.

There is a reason for having statutes of limitations. It is so this type situation doesn't come up and so a person does not have to go thru their entire life worrying of accusations about the past. Of the ONLY two making a criminal accusation - only one in public and that a read script - there was no reason for either to wait 38 years to make this accusation. I think people are recognizing that something is off about the smear campaign.

 

No, the number is NOT higher. Being of legal age is being of legal age.

Only TWO have accused him of groping her. One has refused to say so publicly and we only have hearsay from a Democrat reporter. The other did go on camera, read a script written by a lawyer and refused to take or answer any questions.

NONE of the others are accusers of any misconduct. They were of legal age. Said he asked her out on a date. She said no. Story ended there. No accusation whatsoever.

 

I cannot disagree, in substance, with nearly anything you have said. But, I must disagree where, in your first sentence you said "That is NOTHING." It is absolutely not "nothing".

Remember, the goal of this smear campaign is not to find criminal offense, or justice for the wronged.... The goal is to torpedo Moore's campaign. So, even the mere accusations, and even if they turn out to be devoid of any proof or merit, when this carefully timed, is enough to achieve that goal. If they can torpedo Moore's senate run, then they have victory. Even if these stories all turn out to be fabrications, and exaggerations, without any wrongdoing or impropriety, or even participation, on Moore's part at all.

This was timed precisely to be sure that maximum damage is done to the opposition candidate while leaving his party no time to field an alternative or make an attempt to exonerate him.

And once Moore is ruined, all these women, and their stories, will be all be abandoned by the media, and the political left.

 

I'm tempted too believe that woman is a fraud simply because of the emergence of Alred.

 

What a shmuck.

 

IT’S A FAKE! Analyst Says Judge Roy Moore Signature Inside Gloria Allred Accuser’s Yearbook Was FORGED

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...nside-gloria-allred-accusers-yearbook-forged/

 

LOL, he is asking for a forensic investigation of the yearbook.

 

IS this why women are coming out o the woodwork to make accusations?

http://wkrg.com/2017/11/14/curious-robocall-seeks-damaging-information-on-moore/