Roy Moore's lawyer casts doubt on accuser's story, yearbook inscription

The "robocalls" were Moore's campaign obviously trying to muddy the water and back up the Right-wing lie that the victims were paid.
This is easy to tell from your link just by looking at the date of the call, Nov 14. The story first broke Nov 9, so any attempt to offer money had to happen BEFORE Nov 9, not after!!!!!

 

It obviously was done by the Jones campaign to try to then lay the blame on the Moore campaign. Robocalls purported for one campaign - but are of a nature to outrage the people receiving the call - is not a new tactic.

 

Seems obvious. Two different color ink. It looks like she traced the rest of his name from the divorce decree and didn't know what the D.A. stood for. Caught red handed.

 

The attacks on roy moore are all politically motivated

The republican swamp rats in washington could not defeat moore by debating the issues so they resorted to character assassination instead

 

He's the sickest dude since Clinton.

 

Well, lawyers do get paid to do this, so no surprise here.

Moore is single handedly destroying the GOP; the longer he stays in, the more damage he does.

Defending him is not good for that party.

But whatevs.

 

Who? First of all, only two came out accusing him of misconduct, not the phony numbers of 5 or 8. The first accuser has no evidence, and second is her son says is lying.

So who are the two more women, and why did they wait? Did he ask them out on a date? Because that is not illegal.

 

I've bounced back and forth on Moore and the TWO allegations that matter. I don't care if he asked legal age teens on dates or not for the others.
I've decided that for those 2 it is a bunch of BS. ONE (claimed age 14 at the time) has NEVER made any public statement, it is just a hearsay statement by Democrat reporter. The other just read a statement written by a Democrat feminist NY lawyer - also refusing to answer any questions.
But also it is over 3 and a half decades ago.

I do not accept that a "victim" can decide to wait until there is NO possible evidence to obtain, NO possibility of a trial, refusing to even allow being questioned - and then declaring because she waited until there can be no investigation nor questioning of her allowed, you MUST assume the man he is accusing is guilty because she made certain there is no possibility to prove innocence or nor even allow her to be questioned.

That's a bunch of crap, totally unjust, and over ridiculous. IF she decided for over 3 decades to let it go, its over and that was her decision long ago.

What next? "52 years ago when the Republican candidate for governor and I were in grade school, he beat me up and called me racist names!" - to the candidate saying I don't even remember that person." Then by proving they went to the same elementary school we are to assume the person is a violent racist and the accusation is true? Is it that much BS crap about Moore too.

IF you are a victim of assault or abuse, as soon as away from that person YOU ACT ON IT. I only make exception for children - and then only until the child becomes an adult. IF the person doesn't report it ASAP when it is safe to do so - I'm not listening to this BS retaliatory crap anymore. The statute of limitations is absolute - why it is called a "DEAD line." After that, your complaint is DEAD. And if delaying reporting it reduces the possible evidence, this works against the ACCUSER, not the ACCUSED.

As for this being all about women? How many men have had an ex making false accusation of "he verbally/psychologically abused me," "he was a control freak," "I was afraid of him," etc, etc, etc? If she doesn't, how does she justify the break up and for MOST people SOMEONE ALWAYS has to be at fault for everything and it is NEVER her/himself.

Been abused? Report it or forever hold your peace, you abandoned the right to the issue. Again, I noted my exception for children until the become adults or are safe to tell. NOTHING prevented any woman coming out against Moore when he ran in previous elections.

 

Has Allred authenticated the inscription in the yearbook yet.
If not - why not?

 

Or opposition to make the useful idiots accuse the Moore campaign of it.

 

The whole thing is just pathetic from all angles, the Republicans, the Democrats and all the sycophants on both sides following them.

It has made me think back on my past ....

I have hooked up with A LOT of girls, but NEVER touched one who didn't want me to. But could some woman come out against me if I were to run for politics in 20 years? Dunno ... How would I defend myself? How would I prove the unprovable?

Washington is broken, I hate the two party system and my country flat out disgusts me right now

 

The claim is that if any female made any accusation against you it is to be accepted as true unless you can 100% disprove it.

 

Roy more needs to release all the previous signature examples he has on file, the ink needs to be tested to make sure the time-frame of the signature matches

I doubt Roy will do this, but the ink can be tested, so that at the very least should be done

I heard Roy's wife went to school with the victim, wonder if he signed her yearbook too? be interesting if a match there...

"Roy Moore’s wife was in the same high school class as his fifth sexual misconduct accuser"

https://www.yalehome.com/en/yale/yalehome/residential/nest-yale-lock/

 

Now that’s a dumb post.

 

care to elaborate?

the only way for experts to evaluate the signature is for him to release many examples from the past, the more the better

the ink can be tested and should be, knowing if the ink is recent or from 1977 is very important to know

 

The same Gateway Pundit that posted a picture of a Cleveland Cavaliers victory parade and said it was a line outside a Trump rally in Maine? Well, if anyone would know fake, it's him.

 

LIE! There is NO "fifth sexual misconduct accuser."

There are thousands of samples of his signature of papers he signed as a judge.

 

he was a da at the time, those are the many signatures we need, hopefully someone will compile them into a link

but really the thing I really want to see is a test for the age of the ink, I already think the signatures "look" the same, I just want to know if the signature is recent or done around the time the accusations were said to have happened

 

Number of what? Look at what they are actually saying, well not saying. This is a set-up, there is no sex, there have only been two allegations of misconduct, the rest is fluff to bulk up the numbers but there are no crimes, and nothing illegal for that matter. That boils this down to two potential accusers, 40 years later and neither one will talk to outside reporters, they will not release their 'evidence' for review, why should anyone believe this?

 

Not sure it matters all that much anymore...... as if a person aka self confessed ) crotch grabber can get to be Prez.......the entire standards and expectations of public service people has been reduced so low .......that it is as if no standards,ethics let alone "morals" are the new norm.

Welcome to the first season of Reality America.

 

Michael savage? Pfffffffffffffffffffffffft, yeah, well, nevermind, not worth the bandwidth.

 

Haha. Why do you dislike him ?

 

I think he is the perfect voice for you.

 

Hmm maybe, not sure of his stance on unions. I like a bit of Rush occasionally, I'm gonna guess you are not a Rush guy either ?

 

the accuser Beverly Young Nelson was in the same yearbook as his current wife

the count is 8 now, not sure if she was fifth or not

I would like to know what his wife's age was when she first met Roy