Russia will target US jets in parts of Syria, defence ministry says

Don't you know, the US action in 1953 gives iran a get out of jail card to conduct war and terrorism for the next thousand years. Never mind the facts that it was the British who did far more, or that the shah was infinitely better for the iranian people than the disgusting filth regime in power since 1979, or that countries like russia had its army occupying TWENTY ONE other countries - only the US is "bad" and can be blamed for iran's horrific behavior.

Just gets boring hearing the same trolling crap from the same people over and over.

 

Did I say he represented 85% of the people? Because of the likelihood this is not the case that's justification for throwing the country into turmoil? Like Libya and Iraq? Those countries are shadows of their former selves. Guaranteed you take a poll those countries would wish we never arrived.

>>>MOD EDIT Baiting Removed<<< If 85% of the Syrians wanted Assad gone, he'd be gone. A government is nothing against a unified populace. It's not our fight and never was. People like you shoving this aggressive, regime-changing viewpoint down everyone's throats are the #1 problem with this country right now.

Where's your outcry for the horrible conditions Libya is in right now? What those people are going trough? See I took one look at the results of our regime changes and decided it's clearly not beneficial for those people. WHICH WAS THE WHOLE POINT RIGHT?

Or do you just get mad at what the television tells you to be mad at? Go over to Libya and post FROM THERE telling us how bad Assad is. We "liberated" them and now they have this hunky-dory "democracy. You won't go because you value your life. And that's exactly why I'm against HURTING the people of Syria by supporting what we've done in the past.

 

Bush included iran in the axis of evil that liberals so objected to

Now they are committed to supporting iran in order to protect obamas legacy

 

Even longer

For as long as the wind blows and the sun shines

 

The American people have zero influence over government and our congressional 'representatives' don't represent us, just themselves and their friends.

 

You claimed he was the legitimate leader.

You mean before IRAN arrived. iraq was doing quite well before the scumbag iranian filth activated their shia militias, began throwing all of the sunnis out of work, and took to marginalizing them.

Sticks and stones...and you're out of your depth.

Uhm, why is that? Did assad and his family give you the impression they weren't going to mass slaughter the whole country to stay in power? Was that any different from iran in 2009? These f--king diseased regimes will kill every person in their country if they have to so as to remain in power, that should be obvious to anyone by now.

Unless that government is the one with the guns.

Why is the anti-US left like this so dishonest? If the US accepts a dictator and works with them (saudis) they are attacked for doing so, if the US doesn't accept a dictatorship and refuses to work with it (iran) they get attacked as well. Some people just hate the US, and want to fling mud at it no matter what.

If you actually had a clue, you'd know it wasn't obama or the US who did much in libya other than support the euros who bombed the libyan government forces. Like the 1953 iran coup, the US was barely involved - yet magically gets the lion's share of the blame, as usual.

Don't own a TV.

Given that iran, assad and putie boy have mass slaughtered over a million syrians, and iran has ethnically cleansed about 6 MM sunnis out of syria, I'm not exactly sure what the US could have done that was "worse" than anything those 3 pieces of sh-t have done.

 

I did not say we gave him chemical weapons nor did I say we gave him biological WMD's.

We did give Iraq bacterial nasties.

https://fas.org/irp/congress/2002_cr/s092002.html

If you are done building straw men ... go back and address the central point of my post instead of creating fallacious red herrings.

 

What get's boring is listening to your continued apologizing for terrorist groups.

 

You have reading comprehension issues.

Saying "we gave him biological's" is not saying "we gave him WMD/Biological weapons"

2) Saying "we were supporting and funding him while using chemical weapons" is not saying "we gave him chemical weapons".

What is your problem did you quit school after grade 8 or something ?

 

Now you are splitting hairs

"We gave him biologicals" implies wmd's

 

We did give him biologicals as per the link I gave you previously