Same-sex marriage will not change a single day-to-dy thing for Americans

How do you not get banned...

 

Actually, I have refuted your position numerous times. It is not my fault you are not gifted with intelligence significant enough to grasp that. Also, the discrimination against young persons has been held to be justifiable, and it is not my position, it is the position of the United States Supreme Court since 1969.

I'm still waiting on you to give an example of that doctrine being employed by a homosexual in a court case.

Because I speak the truth. It's also possible that some of the moderators wish they could say exactly what I am saying but refrain from doing so. I mean, of course, it's hard to comprehend the level of idiocy that Shadow and yourself espouse on this issue. You spout falsehoods that were debunked numerous times.

And honestly, I don't really care IF I get banned. It wouldn't be the first time that I was banned for not being able to tolerate idiocy.

 

How cute, you thought I ended my comment with a question mark.

Was purely just drawing attention to your childish name calling.

Continue...

 

The greater damage is to the HOMOsexuals, silly.

No intelligent person is overly-worried about homosexual marriage affecting heteros in a major way. It only colors the definition of marriage until that time that everyone realizes that marriage always was for a woman-man couple.

 

I think it's MORE than just possible...

Political corruptness, oops, 'correctness' is a snake in the grass, isn't it?

 

I would be interested to know who you would explain that. Please indulge me

- - - Updated - - -

Are you sure about that??

 

Yeah, but I wanted to hedge my bets. I still wish there were more moderators who could take a look at some of the obvious Rule 10 violations that happen on a daily basis.

"Always" is a dangerous sword to brandish in a debate. Prove that, throughout history there was never once a civilization that defined marriage irregardless of sex.

And you just made the case to allow same-sex marriage. Unless disparagement of rights can be proven, the bans on same-sex marriages fail the strict scrutiny test and thus cannot stand as constitutional.. Since people are not worried about there being damage to heterosexual marriage, per your own statement, it's a general grievance. The Supreme Court does not rule in favor of general grievances, in fact, they avoid taking those cases, per Hollingsworth.