Scientists have no idea what made this huge hole on Mars

Looks impressive though? Just think of all those particles whizzing arou . . .

 

No clue what so every about what goes on or what the benefits have been, the advances in imaging and detectors have directly led to advanced CT scans and spectral imaging.

 

I don't - as I said, it was a slip of the tongue for astronomy. Astrology is for old ladies.

CERN's own website - you don't think it might be biased by any chance, do you?

 

Smash the spinning Jenny

 

Yes because the applications aren’t actually used in hospitals and other areas at all and the real inventors just decided to keep quiet about it

So do you have faith or an argument with Astronomy because you’ve said it’s now?

 

Oh well , people do believe anything they read all to often , a particle accelerator collide ''thingy'' produced that ? Yeah right .

 

Any proof our source for that claim, so who did invent spectral imaging for CT scans or are they just not real.

 

Probably some poor sap went on a science forum with the idea or sent it for peer view and the idea was stolen. You know a bit like Albert patent clerk Einstein might have done . That's probably why he got E=mc² wrong , he probably misunderstood it .

 

So non then, what a shock. Pretty much like you other claims BS and buzzwords

Lol

 

Think what you want as I know what I know in regards to science . I can say that when the Royal Navy eventually have my n-class destroyer design , you'll see my work !

Air attacks , submarine attacks or other boats attacks , will be futile .

 

Sure OK, guess we’ve moved on from weapon design

 

Not at all , ships need weapons .

 

The LHC will produce tons of b-mesons and b-baryons, as well as more Higgs bosons than every other particle source combined. Sure, the biggest breakthrough we could hope for would be the detection of a brand new particle, and evidence for one of the great theoretical breakthroughs that have dominated particle physics in recent decades: supersymmetry, extra dimensions, technicolor, or grand unification. But even in the absence of that, there is plenty to learn, at a fundamental level, about how the Universe works. There are plenty of indicators that nature plays by rules we have not yet fully discovered, and that's more than enough motivation to keep looking. We already have the machine, and the data will be on its way in unprecedented amounts very soon. Whatever new hints are hiding at the TeV scale will soon be within reach.

Ethan Siegel - Astrophysicist

 

So, an astrophysicist bigs up space, what a surprise! 'how the Universe works' - ffs, the very phrase sounds infantile.

 

and a troll dumb sizes down.. but you are right.. there are crooked scientists too.. I worked with some briefly

 

See, you're doing it again - putting words in the wrong order, so they make no sense. Are you dyslexic or sommat?

 

sommat? variant of summat, variant of something.

So you're British. That explains a lot. Too much tea makes you crazy.