Sean Hannity is Michael Cohen's Mystery Client

"Whatif" sounds a whole lot like "whatabout." Whataboutism is a Russian active measure.

I'm not even going to address Comey covering for Hillary. Comey's October letter has been statistically proven to have hurt Hillary. If you see things another way, you're using emotions and not facts.

My connection to reality is solid.

However, if you truly believe what Putin and Russias did in the last election to be inconsequential, I'm concerned about your connection to reality.

 

I didn't do a thing to Flynn, except state my opinion. Flynn made his own illegal mistakes, all by himself.

I think McCabe was treated disrespectfully. If he deserved to be fired for his lack of candor, that's fine, but no one deserved to be viciously disrespected the way he was. Comey and Tillerson were also disrespected when they were fired. Karma works its way back around. Whoever was responsible for firing these men disrespectfully should get a Karmic reward of having the same thing happen to them, IMO.

I'm calling out the hypocrisy of Sessions bowing to partisan pressure to fire McCabe for a lack of candor, while Sessions keeps his job after perjuring himself in his Senate confirmation.

 

Facts.....LOL! I didn't realize it had been scientifically and undoubtedly established as fact that Comey's second public pronouncement on Hillary's email problems cost her the election. Could you post that fact, please. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-much-did-comey-hurt-clintons-chances/

Is it possible that Comey's second public pronouncement on Hillary's email problems hurt her more than his first public address, following the FBI's sham "investigation", which spared her candidacy and removed the obstacle of prison time from her future? No. Not possible!

NO ONE has established a nexus between Trump's win and Russia's meddling. NO ONE!

 

So, you admit the possibility that the polling changed dramatically after Comey's October letter, link a citation and then play semantics? lol Here's another link from the same site, a little more current than the one you chose… https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-comey-letter-probably-cost-clinton-the-election/

But the effect of those factors — say, Clinton’s decision to give paid speeches to investment banks, or her messaging on pocket-book issues, or the role that her gender played in the campaign — is hard to measure. The impact of Comey’s letter is comparatively easy to quantify, by contrast. At a maximum, it might have shifted the race by 3 or 4 percentage points toward Donald Trump, swinging Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Florida to him, perhaps along with North Carolina and Arizona. At a minimum, its impact might have been only a percentage point or so. Still, because Clinton lost Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin by less than 1 point, the letter was probably enough to change the outcome of the Electoral College.​

If you haven't seen the connections between Trump's win and Russian meddling, its because you don't want to see them. I'm not saying that Trump's win was precisely and solely due to Russian meddling, but there's no doubt they had some impact. Otherwise, Facebook wouldn't be in so much trouble. If I thought Russian meddling was the whole ball of wax, I wouldn't have mentioned Comey's October letter. Comey's letter wasn't illegal. Russian meddling, especially with Americans assisting, is. Comey's letter didn't come with a quid pro quo. Russian meddling did.

What you haven't seen is a conviction… yet.

 

You confirmed what I have believed about this subject.

 

No. Where did I admit that? In theory is it "possible"
Comey's October letter changed the polling "dramatically"? :Lots of things are possible....in theory.
It's possible, in theory, that Mole Men living under the surface of the earth put something in the water causing Hillary to lose much of her popular support. But can anyone demonstrate there is any truth in that? I don't think so.

"It might have", "it's impact might have been", "perhaps", "it's impact might have been",
"probably enough"...etc. I don't see a single declaration of fact though I do see many qualifiers and suppositions.
​

Just as soon as you, or someone else, proves Americans assisting the Russians
in robbing deal old Hillary Clinton of her presidency.

 

You still seem in mourning Hillary lost.

 

Are you aware statisticians do not speak in absolutes?

Whataboutism with Clinton is noted and ignored.

 

More whataboutism with Hillary. Whataboutism is a Russian active measure.

If you can't address the content of my post, don't try to armchair psychoanalyze me. If you want to know what I think, ask me. I'll tell you. You don't have to guess.

 

You had the chance to state any differences. Sure, do you wish Hillary won?

 

Frankly, I think if Hillary had won, she would have been mired in gridlock and investigations throughout her Presidency. We are that divisive and partisan.

I want my country to be united, economically healthy, and out of war. The divide in our country isn't going to allow that to happen without a political paradigm shift. One is coming, but it's not here yet. I suspect things will be very different come the next presidential election.

 

Obama CIA Chief John Brennan Made Secret Visit to Russia Around Same Time as Fusion GPS Produced Russian Disinformation anti-Trump Memos.

 

After the Judge that took his plea was forcible recused, the Judge now handling the case has commanded that Mueller produce to the judge ALL exculpatory evidence that the FBI/DOJ and SC has on Flynn so that the Judge can confirm that all this information was provided to Flynn before he pled.

This judge hates dirty prosecutors and does not suffer their shady antics.

Some things I will be looking for:

1. Was Flynn informed prior to pleading that Dirty Peter Stzok, lead on his case, had been removed for bias?
2. That the judge that took his plea was also a FISA judge, perhaps the same one that approved the illegal spying on the Trump campaign?
3. That the judge who took his plea, who was also a FISA judge, was improperly and secretly cultivated by Dirty Peter Styzok and his adulterous girlfriend Lisa "Happy Horn-dog" Page?
4. Was Flynn informed that BOTH the FBI agents that interviewed him, reported that he did NOT lie to them?

If the Judge determines that the guilty plea was improperly obtained by shady prosecutors working with a compromised Judge, I expect the guilt plea to be vacated, in the absence of compelling evidence to the contrary.

 

Ex CIA chief John Brennan has been the most vociferous and strident critic of Donald Trump to emerge from the Deep State.




New Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) said Tuesday that President-elect Donald Trump is “being really dumb” by taking on the intelligence community and its assessments on Russia’s cyber activities.

“Let me tell you, you take on the intelligence community, they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you,” Schumer told MSNBC's Rachel Maddow.

“So even for a practical, supposedly hard-nosed businessman, he’s being really dumb to do this.”

 

Without going to a judge, Flynn could change his mind, if he doesn't want the plea deal. Google it and see if Flynn has asked for the plea deal to be overturned, or if pundits and talking heads have simply discussed what would happen if his plea deal was overturned. You'll find that Flynn is not trying to have the plea deal nullified. If Flynn doesn't want to change his plea deal, and there is no evidence that he does, arguments to the contrary are hypothetical, at best.

 

Speaking of Jerkwads:

Gee, What Changed? Left-Wing Offers "Thoughts and Prayers" to Victims of Toronto Terrorism

I thought that "thoughts and prayers" were a meaningless sentiment tossed out in lieu of actually confronting the problem.

The left keeps telling us that, right?

So what are we to make of DiBlasion offering "thoughts and prayers" after a terrorist attack?

Guess he's not really interested in doing anything tangible.

Shaun King -- who hews to the racist belief that a pasty White Caucasian can do a better job of being a black guy than an actual black guy -- was also caught offering empty sentiments instead of demands for tangible action.

http://ace.mu.nu/archives/374946.php