One of the biggest news items in Australia this past week or so has been about an online child porn site that was being run by Australian high school students. Basically the site is for students of some private schools in Sydney and high school males uploaded naked pictures of teenage girls from various schools around Sydney. The site had girls from various private and public schools and the boys had ranked them and if you got naked pictures of the higher ranked teenage girls on the list this was worth more and could be worn as a badge of honour. So this is a huge story here in Australia and some kid got suspended from school over it apparently. If I didnt know any better I might think that the Australian media love this story so very much because they are degenerates and this story gives them an excuse to talk about hot naked teenage girls. So of course with a story like this there are many follow up stories and the next big thing the media are pushing on this story is that some Sydney private school has been "slammed" for "slut shaming". Apparently the school was concerned about this child porn site that had pictures of naked teenage girls on it that were being uploaded by male students from various Sydney private schools. So the school had a talk with the students and told the teenage girls that their school skirts should come to their knees. The school told its female students that their teenage female legs were distracting to the male students. So apparently some mother of a student made a facebook post slamming the school for slut shaming her daughter - and now the Australian media is pushing some video from a female student at the school that felt as though the school had slut shamed her. http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/s...t-ban-in-powerful-speech-20160820-gqxdvc.html So now the Australian media has an excuse to run a heap of pictures of teenage girls in short school uniform skirts. And apparently the message that we the public should be getting from this is that short school uniform skirts on teenage girls is good. It is wrong to expect a teenage girls school uniform dress to come to her knees. Fair enough. I have seen a lot of very similar news items coming from the degenerate US media. It is common to see stories about US schools slut shaming some young teenage girl for wearing a slutty dress to her 'prom'. ( It sounds like you are saying praam to me. With at least one a. Also when you say Craig it sounds like Creg. I know you can make the a sound. Craig. Try saying it slowly. I thought that Creg was an American name until recently. You are also getting Nissan, Hyundai and aluminum wrong. And what is with the emphasis on the in in insurance? Its insurance - not INsurance. ) Or you see some school has slut shamed a young American teenage girl by sending her home from school for wearing slutty clothes. I would suggest a uniform but apparently that is no answer because we cannot tell teenage girls to wear skirts that come to their knees. What about longer knee socks then? Thigh school socks? That could work. Anyway, most of you Americans use public schools dont you. And none of your public schools require students to wear a uniform. And that is weird to me. Americans are like a bunch of hippies or something just letting kids wear whatever they want to school. Dont you think school uniforms are good? I do. Why wouldnt you want all US students to be in uniforms? But yeah - this slut shaming at schools seems to be a western developed world issue whether our students wear school uniforms or not. So where do we draw the line on short skirts? What if the short skirt is not even long enough to cover the female students thigh gap? I have seen skirts in porn that are so short that they really dont cover anything. Does a skirt have to cover the teenage girls thigh gap? How many centimetres should there be from thigh gap to end of a teenage girls skirt? Or is asking this question a form of slut shaming? At some point the skirt must become too short for school right? And what message are we sending to teenage girls telling them that no skirt is too short no matter where you are - even at high school. Arent we actually encouraging teenage girls to be sluts with all this nonsense about how terrible slut shaming is? Now if a grown woman wants to take a Slut Walk then fair enough - but would you really send your teenage daughter on a Slut Walk? The teenage girl from the video that the Australian media is trying to make go 'viral' is saying that her body is "not sacred". Wouldnt you want your teenage daughter to think of her body as being somewhat sacred at least while she was a child and school student? Or special, or something like that? Is there such a thing as a slut anymore? Are we telling our teenage girls that there is no such thing as a slut? Is that really a good thing? To me I see the Blurred Lines film clip and it makes me think that the Thicke guy ( is he related to the father from Growing Pains ) and Pharrel Williams are total wankers. What a couple of morons. To suggest that society in general celebrates a couple of idiots like that is not truth. There is such a thing as a male slut and male sluttyness and I think that most would agree that it is off-putting. If people acted like that in real life people would laugh at them. These people are clowns dancing for stupid teenage girls. And yeah it isnt the 50s anymore and to suggest that males are running about high fiving our mates over how many notches we have put on our bedposts is offensive and ridiculous. So all these feminist sluts that claim that they can be slutty and it is good because society has celebrated males being slutty which was a double standard is just a very weak excuse for them to act like massive sluts. That is the truth. They act as though they disapprove of apparent historic male sluttyness yet their solution is to act even sluttier than men have acted. It is some big joke to have Chris Hemsworth in new feminist Ghostbusters cuckolding us male viewers by making him some sexy secretary, but did the original Ghostbusters even have a hot secretary? I dont think they did. But even if they had of are feminists saying that their solution to sexist males is to act even worse than males have historically? WTF? Are they serious? And they want to get their nipples out for equality? because men can walk around in public without a shirt? Why not make it illegal for men to walk around public without a shirt? There is such a thing as no shirt, no shoes no service. Are so many men really walking around in public topless? And this makes female feel oppressed and want to get their nipples out? These people are ridiculous. They are useful idiots for degenerates and most of them seem to have no idea. Fine - let teenage girls wear skirts as short as they like. If they feminists say so. HA! (google images) [video=youtube;ABhDiXbUaBE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ABhDiXbUaBE[/video]
What we are moving toward is a world that is void of desecration. Very soon there will be no such thing as desecration. There will be nothing to desecrate. Wouldnt that be a shame?
` ` Some men using subjective morals to force their view on females. Nothing more, nothing less. I contribute to a fund to buy them some tissue to wipe up their tears.
Most Japanese girls wear super-short skirts for their school uniforms and the graphic above is the real examples of school uniforms in Japan. Since wearing short skirts is a Japanese trend, it may go against Australian culture. Australian school uniforms are deliberately made out of fashion and unattractive by school administrators, who may be worried about teen pregnancy and other undesirable activities by young girls.
Some girls will prefer to wear as short a skirt as possible. This is not new...I recall it when I was in high school. Seems the required minimum length just wasn't that long on an almost-6' cheerleader.
According to Princeton....don't you mean people? The use of the word man is banned. Im going to invoke those rules here to see which leftists object. Therefore its some people using subjective morals.
` Wrong thread. This is about the far right being upset about short uniform skirts in school and their subjective (if not hypocritical) morality behind it.
The ONLY reason school girls are required to wear skirts is SO their legs can be seen (and judged like cattle) and teachers can see up their skirts from the front of the classroom. What other reason could there possibly be for school girls to be forced to wear skirts ???
And that is why schools force girls to wear skirts when wearing pants would solve the problem. The priests and nuns and teachers want that eye candy. WHY else would school girls be forced to wear skirts???
Well what do you want them to wear? Pants? In Australia we force children to wear school uniforms so that they are all the same and so the poor children do not feel bad for having shabby clothing compared to classmates. It doesnt work out the best because a lot of scabby families will get poorly fitting uniforms or second hand faded uniforms and their children still stand out for being poor. What would be better would be if the state issued the students with their uniforms for public schools at the start of the year and take the cost out of poor families welfare or whatever. And back in the day females wore skirts. I really do not think there is anything sinister or untoward about skirts for females for their school uniforms. Females wear skirts/dresses, males wear pants. Or they used to anyway. Im sure transgender female born students can wear school pants instead if they want to in this day and age here in Australia or in transgender bathroom pushing USA. - - - Updated - - - It wont be long now.
There's nothing else girls can wear ......???? Did you know women have been wearing pants for hundreds of years?? And, yes, if priests and nuns and teachers could force girls to be naked they would....this is as close as they can get....
YES, if you force girls to show off their legs then why not force them to be naked so they can be totally judged and graded? """"In Australia we force children to wear school uniforms so that they are all the same""" But they're not, girls are forced to wear a cloth around their waists to show off bare flesh and boys aren't....
No need to force girls to show off their legs or the rest of them, for that matter. I taught at a Presbyterian school where the students wore uniforms. I would catch the girls hiking up their thongs so that they showed above their skirts.
USA forces teenage school girls to shower naked with transgender students that were born males and still have the penis. USA also forces US teenager girls to share lavatories with these male born transgender. And all you have to take is the students word for it that they are genuine transgenders and not just faking to get to shower with hot teenage girls at school after gym. Forcing your students to get naked together would be USAs next move wouldnt it? Not Australias. The traditional Australian school system has been described by many as being "nazi-like". The idea of us having uniforms for students to make them the same is the exact same thinking behind the Hitler Youth and their uniforms. I saw a documentary about that record breaking rally of the Hitler Youth that Hitler attended and there was this German guy talking about it and how he was there as a kid - and he said that a boy next to him was crying so he asked him what was wrong - and the boy told him that he felt so happy that everyone was the same. You can imagine with the poverty that Germans suffered under the Treaty of Versailles there were a lot of German children that were from scabby families and many wearing shabby clothing. Imagine how happy that boy must have been that was crying because all of the children in the stadium were the same. think of that unity too. Of the belonging. It is the same with our uniforms and our school colours and our school emblems and our school mottos. The uniform reinforces the community of the school. But yeah the traditional Australian school system thinking has parallels with nazi thinking. Which had its good points. Uniforms are good. It is degenerate to allow students to just dress as they please as if they were wild hippies or something. [video=youtube;VX1UD-5txlU]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VX1UD-5txlU[/video] And the problem isnt that the girls are forced to show their flesh - it is that they want to show too much flesh. Remember. Some of them do anyway. Im sure there are plenty of teenage girls that are comfortable with wearing skirts and dresses that come to at least their knees at school. If they have no respect for their modesty then how about some respect for their school community and the schools reputation?
That is totally unrelated to what I posted....this may surprise you but not EVERY girl wants to show off her thong....and to imply that if one does it's OK to force all school girls to wear skirts is ridiculous.
In the old days boys were forced to swim nude in the gym class and some even had female instructors: https://sites.google.com/site/histo...ves---mid-20th-century-to-current/photographs
"""""The school told its female students that their teenage female legs were distracting to the male students. """ These Aussies must be Muslims, blaming the women for what men might do. The ignorant, the weak, Those who FORCE girls to wear skirts: First they SEXUALLY OBJECTIFY girls by forcing them to expose their legs. THEN they shame them for ...wait for it!..... exposing their legs. It would be nice if the young women of today broke free, grew a spine and said, """If ya wanna see it you'll FIRST have to pay for it....""" This free stuff they're giving away, someday they'll regret not making a dime off it...
[QTE=FoxHastings;1066550595]"""""The school told its female students that their teenage female legs were distracting to the male students. """ These Aussies must be Muslims, blaming the women for what men might do. The ignorant, the weak, Those who FORCE girls to wear skirts: First they SEXUALLY OBJECTIFY girls by forcing them to expose their legs. THEN they shame them for ...wait for it!..... exposing their legs. It would be nice if the young women of today broke free, grew a spine and said, """If ya wanna see it you'll FIRST have to pay for it....""" This free stuff they're giving away, someday they'll regret not making a dime off it...[/QUOTE] Well many of these young ladies are very well positioned to have rewarding careers as sugarbabies or girlfriend experience escorts in the future and I am sure that many will capitalize on their desirability. Which is fair enough. What I am concerned about is children. Maybe the solution is to rethink what a 'child' actually is. Us Roman Catholics and Jews consider our children to be Sons and Daughters of the Commandments at about 13 years. Us Roman Catholics are confirmed at this age and Jews have their Bar Mitzvah at about the same age. At this age the child is considered to be responsible for their own action before God. Now in most developed nations we can have sex with teenage girls at 16 years but cannot take or look at a picture of them naked. 13 is only 3 years away from 16. Now I'm not saying that the age of consent should be 13 or that a person should be considered to be a full adult at 13 but we can say that a 13 year old is responsible for their own actions and can make their own choices on most things. Here in Australia a 13 year old terrorist is treated the same as any other terrorist. What we need to protect young females from is exploitation certainty but we also need to accept that at about 13 children are capable of giving informed consent on most things and are responsible for their own choices and actions. Most of us have read or seen Lolita and I do not think anyone really disagrees with what I am saying. So yeah - if a 13 year old wants to wear a short skirt then maybe feminists are correct that they are old enough to make these decisions for themselves but like I said - at some point a skirt must become too short and a line does need to be drawn somewhere. That is all I am saying. And like I said, transgender students are free to wear pants rather than a skirt in this day and age in USA and Australia.
Oh come on many guys like looking at older teen girls in clothes and if they are eighteen or nineteen its legal if nude, and would tap one if they could get away with it. So lets stop acting all high and mighty here people. If its such a problem in schools then drop the skirt uniforms for pants and nice shirts and a jacket and go more unisex. As for the photos they are getting punished for them, since child porn is illegal, while looking at girls in sexy uniforms isn't.
