St. Paul: Mother & Daughter Stop for Gas...Get Beaten Up by "Teens"

Well, hold tight to your shekals ! Meanwhile, If you can make the effort, please tell us all what we know of the perps from the article. Instead of wasting so much time trying to play your race card, do go to the article, it is short btw, and tell us where the description given has been improperly conveyed by any poster here.

And be careful. So far you have the only racist posts in this thread. Would hate to see you continue digging that hole.

 

You're really just digging your own hole deeper now. I don't think there is anyone in here who doesn't see through your vague horse(*)(*)(*)(*).


How much of a description do you deem necessary? Say all they saw was one of the assailants was a tall caucasian male with blonde hair and a blue sweatshirt. How would that be helpful exactly? Would you be scared of all blonde caucasian teenagers in blue sweatshirts?

 

Well now.....apparently the mother and daughter identified them as "teens".......do you think there might have been an immutable characteristic that they probably also identified their attackers with......and, if so, why would the media withhold that information from the public?

 

Why would you bring up "racism"....to the best of my knowledge we have no idea the race of the perps or victims here....the media has chosen to leave that information out......how can we hate someone "due to the melanin content of their skin" when we don't know what that is......these could have been Amish youts perpetrating this crime....for all the media has chosen to tell us.

 

If I lived in St. Paul and drove into a gas station with my daughter........and there were a bunch of "teen" tall caucasian males with blond hair and blue sweatshirts hangin' around......and the previous story told me that was the description of the perps.......then, yes, I would be scared......think about it.

 

Because the entire point of the thread was to imply the people who committed this crime were black.

 

We have no idea if the "people who committed this crime were black".......all we know is that they were "teens"......that is all the media has chosen to tell us. Apparently, the brutalized mother and daughter just described them as "teens".....nothing more. I don't understand why you want to make this a race issue.......the "teens" could have been Amish, or Norwegian.....who knows.

 

I can only assume that you are "disgusted" by the fact that a mother and daughter can't pull into a gas station at 10:00 pm without being assaulted by a group of "teens"......with the daughter witnessing her mother dragged across a parking lot.....before she is punched in the face....for no apparent reason. What else you could be "disgusted" at eludes me.

 

Strange, I've seen you ask this question before and even after explanations are given, you continue asking it. May I ask the reason?

 

Of course, nobody is hating anybody "due to the melanin content of their skin or the shape of their eyes". People are critical of black people not because their skin color is dark, but because they continue to exhibit a high level of dysfunction in society that, to add insult to injury, is completely whitewashed (pardon the pun) and ignored by progressives and their media outlets.

I hope that is clear enough for you.

 

That is the point, right? To subtly imply that they are black. That is why you use quotation marks, right? Why pretend otherwise?

It just distracts form honest discussion on the topic of race.

 

I see that the media is being consistent

On the East Coast the term "youths" is used but as you head west it seems that "teens" is the descriptor.

At least that helps out anyone trying to locate the suspects. In this case we at least know that they are not "youths" but are "teens"

 

Those rascally teens again. Did any of them leave their Amish hat at the scene?

 

Maybe the AP vernacular "bible" can make sure every story like this uses "tweens". This way we don't have rogue journalists going with "youths".

 

Maybe it's to highlight that "teens" is used by the media when mobs of blacks attack whites? The term "Youths" was used often as well, but fell into disfavor.

- - - Updated - - -

Would we know their race, if the media gave a better description of the suspects?

 

I believe "youths" is still in use. We'll have to wait for warm weather to hit Philly and monitor the news there.

 

Didn't you just say that teen was a code word for black?

I am simply amazed at the constant barrage of threads where folks take a localized crime and mewl like wounded kittens over the media not pandering to their desires to see ballcock faces splashed across their screens whilst they criticize based on skin color.

Are there not other sites on the internet geared towards what you seek? An apparent circle of folks who sit around discussing how blacks are committing crimes nonstop?

 

LOLL!! You may be right. The nation had a very cold spring. It bought America a little extra peace. Now, the "teen" mobs will begin to beat whites again.

Can liberals ignore it or deny it for a third year in a row?

 

So, basically, you are acknowledging that the media uses "Teens" as a code word for blacks. So, why are you so emotional and butt sore this morning?

Crime is non-stop mostly because we abandoned traditional civilization and are trying secular humanist socialism. That being said, mob attacks by one race against another race is somewhat unusual and the media would certainly go nuts, if white teens were attacking blacks. Can you imagine, if white teens were breaking into houses and raping 89 year black women? The media would be howling. But, reverse the races, and the reporting is subdued. Why do you think that is?

 

Not really. That is your claim, that the media uses the word teens in place of blacks. I was simply asking why folks who hold positions like yours insist in threads like these of coding their conversations. If we all know what you think it means, why not just say blacks?

Certainly if you hold your beliefs proudly and feel you are correct, why tone it down? Why not just say what you actually think? If it is in an effort to avoid what is very clearly the forum policy against the incessant "the black guys did it" threads, why not simply post your thoughts at a forum more accepting of your positions?

 

Can you answer these questions please:

I can only speak for myself. Blacks are victims of the progressive establishment. They remain separated by a victim mentality that the Left fosters, inflames, and uses as a tool to both keep a loyal voter base and as a political weapon against conservatives who would reign in the welfare state for both blacks and whites.

Because of catastrophically high levels of illegitimacy and inflamed racial animus, they appear to be mob attacking whites and raping elderly white women. You seem unconcerned. Why?

 

You make it seem like the moral turpitude of their elders may not have had any influence on our society. Only our Mickey Mouse generation elders don't mind doing mickey mouse jobs with public policy choices. Information Age elders know hack and whack jobs are only a last resort and not politics as usual.

 

So organize a crusade against the "Mickey Mouse elders" !!

 

No

I was discussing the topic at hand, not falling victim to off topic tangents.

It simply seems odd to me that folks would need to code what they say. Why not just come out and state it? Why the need to hide, to try and avoid the wrath of the powers that be? if it is so important to have affirmation for your position,why not simply post threads like these where everyone participates int he same sort of group-think?

Awesome strawman argument! I guess when facts are not the basis for a position, simply stateI don't care about old women being raped. Bravo. Not everyone would just completely make up and post such a filthy, nasty lie about me.

I have, over the years, read some absolute filth that folks have said about me, most of it untrue. But I must say never has anyone reached the levels where you have, to publicly state that I do not care about women being raped. Your argument in this thread deserves a trophy of sorts.


May I use said filth as a signature? To demonstrate to the world that is what you put forth? Certainly I would give you full credit for it, and everyone would see what it is you stand for.

 

Because we are not the ones "coding", if in fact that is what the news service did. And if it is "coding", then rather than you take issue with our poking fun at the absurdity of the liberal media, you would have credibility if you criticized the original creator of the "code". But no, liberals are not upset with the media's attempt to whitewash this, but rather that others would draw attention to it !!!

Is there a forum policy against "Blame Bush" too ? What you clearly demonstrate is not only the liberal proclivity to bury one's head in the sand, but also to then attempt to silence, via censorship, those whose opinions most clearly illuminate the failure of your political views.

This thread is much more about news reporting, and the bias within it, then it is whatever nonsense you are pursuing in the hope of trying to silence it.

But do keep posting. We need a willing target to help in displaying the hypocrisy of the left.