Staunch pro lifers that have no adopted children are hypocritical.

If you are making your political choices based on whether your candidate is pro choice or not. And you have not adopted any children are you hypocritical.

 

Bravo thought.
Succinct and powerful message.

Card carrying Pro Lifers should be required to adopt!
Or give up their card carrying option.

Thank you. Looking forward to reading other succinct yet powerful
uploads by you. Too many on Board as if more words adds truthiness.


Do you have a thought about beyond the usual laissez faire?

Moi

r > g

Stop Creeping ism
Harder to recognize than creeping Communism, eh.
http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/is-it-true-part-deux.495478/
Across an immense, unguarded, ethereal border, Canadians, cool and unsympathetic,
regard our America with envious eyes and slowly and surely draw their plans against us.​

 

Well also...If you are pro abortion and have unwanted children, you are also a hypocrite. As far as I know, abortion is legal.

 

If you are pro-welfare and do not give your money to the poor - or take a homeless person into your house - are you a hypocrite?

 

My guess would be. If you were pro abortion and you chose to give birth. Then he or she was wanted.

 

Then what is this thread about?

 

No, you are anti-freedom, particularly for women but also for men but you are not hypocritical. You could be very careful about using birth control, even to the point of not having sex at all in some cases and believe that other people should do the same.

You are hypocritical if you don't believe in giving sufficient welfare to people you have forced to have children to properly raise those children but that doesn't mean you have to raise them yourself.

Abortion is a matter of freedom, not children.

 

When does the conceived gain, "human rights"?

Truly I ponder this question.
Over the decades I have shifted from Pro Pro Pro Abortion Rights to
If the conceived can survive outside the womb, it is a person and entitled to all the protections involved.

I showed mine.
When does the conceived gain "human rights" in your beliefs.
Thank you

Sincerely
Moi

 

One of the absurd arguments is that if a person opposes abortion then the person is required to be socialist.

I'm pro-choice, an avid Trump supporter, and economic conservative.

What I favor is imprisoning any biological parent who walks away from or does not do all possible to provide for their own children. I have no obligation to pay for someone else's children. I will pay for my own.

It was Democrat LBJ that established promoting single welfare parenting as a lifestyle, for which everyone else pays to raise the children, which often are still raised very badly due to a lazy ass career welfare parent.

The MSM propaganda machinery has most people convinced that us peasants have to pick one of two teams and then cheer our team in total agreement, while totally hating the other team. Sadly, many adults are that submissive, beta and juvenile personality.

 

The OP claims that if you oppose legalized abortion you are morally required to pay for other people's children.

 

Not if you are too poor to feed, clothe, and shelter that adoptee, or are not temperamentally suited for parenthood. Pro-lifers do not believe in bad parents being parents, nor do they assert that there should be no financial standard for adoption. A lot also depends on their position on sex education and contraception as well as abortion.

 

Did you typo pro-lifer for pro-choicer?

 

What a bogus argument. You don't have to partake in something in order to be pro something. You can be pro gun and yet not have guns in your house. There's many legitimate reasons for not either having guns or not adopting. From legal to circumstantial. To say such a blanket statement is ludicrous.

 

Hiow is this an introduction. Close and remove thread, please.

 

I've cared for every child I have created and I expect the same of everybody else. I'm not being hypocritical for condemning the killing of children. Nice try.

 

Hypocritical forced-birth fetishists who talk the talk but don't walk the walk. It should be pretty frakkin' obvious...

 

So let me get this straight. If you are against abortion you are anti freedom for women.

What about a woman that gives birth to a child the sperm donor doesn't want? Does that make her anti freedom?

 

This makes absolutely NO sense whatsoever.

 

We aren't talking about children....it's illegal to kill a child . We are talking a ZEF .

 

You can be anti choice and not adopt children...to me the hypocrisy is forcing women to breed against their will and then complaining about food stamps and public assistance

 

There is a new person who is half his! He has to provide for it..as does she

 

Does this mean you have to let murderers into your house because you are against the death penalty?

 

So we have a difference of opinion on when life begins. that doesn't make me a hypocrite.

 

If he doesn't want it, why should he be forced to take care of it?