Dismiss Notice
Thanks for being a member of our community. Please donate toward site expenses if you can.

Study Confirms Climate Models are Getting Future Warming Projections Right

Discussion in 'Environment & Conservation' started by MrTLegal, Jan 11, 2020.

Page 3 of 58
  1. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    92,589
    Likes Received:
    74,045
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    And you are basing this on?

    A) a feeling in your waters
    B) Alex Jones sez so!
    C) Koch bros funded website
    D) other
     
    Bowerbird, Jan 12, 2020
    #51
    Derideo_Te, Phyxius and fiddlerdave like this.
  2. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Then make a climate model that says the Earth is cooling and match that against all of the available data to prove that your model is correct.
     
    MrTLegal, Jan 12, 2020
    #52
    Marcotic, Phyxius and fiddlerdave like this.
  3. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Not you.
     
    MrTLegal, Jan 12, 2020
    #53
  4. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Tariffs on China are paid by Americans.
     
    MrTLegal, Jan 12, 2020
    #54
    fiddlerdave and Bowerbird like this.
  5. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, it definitely was and is not.
     
    MrTLegal, Jan 12, 2020
    #55
    fiddlerdave, bx4 and Bowerbird like this.
  6. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    92,589
    Likes Received:
    74,045
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    The Stern review by an economist, showed it was actually cheaper to action global warming than deal with the issues
    upload_2020-1-12_15-29-53.jpeg
     
    Bowerbird, Jan 12, 2020
    #56
    Derideo_Te and MrTLegal like this.
  7. MolonLabe2009

    MolonLabe2009 Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2009
    Messages:
    33,092
    Likes Received:
    15,284
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'll see your fake chart and raise you one big beautiful chart...

    [​IMG]
     
    MolonLabe2009, Jan 12, 2020
    #57
    Red Lily and ArchStanton like this.
  8. TheGreatSatan

    TheGreatSatan Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2009
    Messages:
    21,269
    Likes Received:
    21,243
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why not get all the believers together in like Paris, and have everyone put tarrifs on China till they cleaned up their act?

    "Warmers" only attack America
     
    TheGreatSatan, Jan 12, 2020
    #58
  9. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    92,589
    Likes Received:
    74,045
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Been debunked!

    Heller aka Steve Goddard has a history of having to retract false statements

    BTW + do you REALLY and I mean REALLY believe that every climate scientist working in every MET bureau and university and government agency and non government agency and private industry have somehow missed this? But of a glaring error.
     
    Bowerbird, Jan 12, 2020
    #59
    Derideo_Te, MrTLegal and fiddlerdave like this.
  10. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    92,589
    Likes Received:
    74,045
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Last edited: Jan 12, 2020
    Bowerbird, Jan 12, 2020
    #60
    Derideo_Te, MrTLegal and fiddlerdave like this.
  11. MolonLabe2009

    MolonLabe2009 Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2009
    Messages:
    33,092
    Likes Received:
    15,284
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Based on the facts...

    GOLDSTEIN: Failed climate policies are about wealth redistribution
    https://torontosun.com/opinion/colu...mate-policies-are-about-wealth-redistribution

    Developing nations in Paris climate accord threaten to keep polluting unless they're paid
    https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jun/5/paris-climate-agreement-shares-nations-wealth/

    Let the Paris climate deal die. It was never good for anything, anyway
    https://business.financialpost.com/...eal-die-it-was-never-good-for-anything-anyway
     
    MolonLabe2009, Jan 12, 2020
    #61
    TheGreatSatan likes this.
  12. 557

    557 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2018
    Messages:
    17,547
    Likes Received:
    9,919
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It’s entirely illogical to project your fears of climate change onto others by using terms like “threat” when, as one of the fearful, you want to unilaterally determine we should all live in fear. I’m sorry not everyone survives the Darwinian model. That’s the way it should be, right?
     
    557, Jan 12, 2020
    #62
    Labouroflove and TheGreatSatan like this.
  13. ArchStanton

    ArchStanton Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2018
    Messages:
    3,230
    Likes Received:
    4,052
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    [​IMG]
     
    ArchStanton, Jan 12, 2020
    #63
    MolonLabe2009 likes this.
  14. MolonLabe2009

    MolonLabe2009 Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2009
    Messages:
    33,092
    Likes Received:
    15,284
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So, you want me to tweak the parameters to show global cooling?

    What would that prove?

    I would be doing exactly what the left-wingers are dong and that is making crap up!
     
    MolonLabe2009, Jan 12, 2020
    #64
    Mrs. b. and TheGreatSatan like this.
  15. 557

    557 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2018
    Messages:
    17,547
    Likes Received:
    9,919
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Can you supply any proof of that statement? Empirical evidence?
     
    557, Jan 12, 2020
    #65
    Labouroflove and TheGreatSatan like this.
  16. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    92,589
    Likes Received:
    74,045
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female

    :roflol::roflol::roflol:

    upload_2020-1-12_15-41-14.jpeg

    Nnnnnope!
     
    Bowerbird, Jan 12, 2020
    #66
    Derideo_Te and fiddlerdave like this.
  17. MolonLabe2009

    MolonLabe2009 Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2009
    Messages:
    33,092
    Likes Received:
    15,284
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nope. It hasn't been debunked.
    Source.
    No, they didn't miss it. They just completely ignored it because they want those big government grants to come in for their research projects.
     
    MolonLabe2009, Jan 12, 2020
    #67
    Labouroflove and ArchStanton like this.
  18. TheGreatSatan

    TheGreatSatan Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2009
    Messages:
    21,269
    Likes Received:
    21,243
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Killing himself would be better for the environment then posting on political forum. I bet his computer, internet, etc, are powered by fossil fuels.
     
    TheGreatSatan, Jan 12, 2020
    #68
    557 likes this.
  19. 557

    557 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2018
    Messages:
    17,547
    Likes Received:
    9,919
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So? It’s to save the planet!
     
    557, Jan 12, 2020
    #69
    Labouroflove and TheGreatSatan like this.
  20. TheGreatSatan

    TheGreatSatan Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2009
    Messages:
    21,269
    Likes Received:
    21,243
    Trophy Points:
    113
    These are the kind of responses people make when they can't challenge the points you make.

    If Democrats aren't responding to your post with crap like this, your not trying hard enough.
     
    TheGreatSatan, Jan 12, 2020
    #70
  21. TheGreatSatan

    TheGreatSatan Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2009
    Messages:
    21,269
    Likes Received:
    21,243
    Trophy Points:
    113
    American Democrats don't want to hurt the Chinese Democrats. They are on the same team.
     
    TheGreatSatan, Jan 12, 2020
    #71
    557 likes this.
  22. 557

    557 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2018
    Messages:
    17,547
    Likes Received:
    9,919
    Trophy Points:
    113
    But if he tells you one more time to be skeert you will stop polluting and he won’t have to. Clever, eh?
     
    557, Jan 12, 2020
    #72
    Labouroflove and TheGreatSatan like this.
  23. TheGreatSatan

    TheGreatSatan Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2009
    Messages:
    21,269
    Likes Received:
    21,243
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It is all for not if he doesn't stop the Chinese Democrats from polluting. They build like a coal plant a day and have to wear mask.

    They are more scared of China then global warming.

    Global warming is just a weapon they use to attack America
     
    Last edited: Jan 12, 2020
    TheGreatSatan, Jan 12, 2020
    #73
    Labouroflove and 557 like this.
  24. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    92,589
    Likes Received:
    74,045
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    I will source my stuff if you source yours!

    Now there were over 3,000 contributing authors to the ipcc papers and only about one in ten scientists contributed

    Here is a short list of the more notable scientists https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_climate_scientists

    Note that includes Nigeria, Australia, India, Japan, UK, European countries etc etc etc

    Are you contending every single one of these people chose to ignore dat that this one non climate scientist has unearthed?

    Why is Heller focussing on NASA data alone?

    Why does he truncate the data sets at 10 - 20 years Ago?
     
    Bowerbird, Jan 12, 2020
    #74
    Derideo_Te likes this.
  25. 557

    557 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2018
    Messages:
    17,547
    Likes Received:
    9,919
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeh, it’s bizarre. Coal is supposedly the devil, climate change is irreversible in 12 years, we have the capability to build nuclear plants in five years, yet it takes 40 years because of “environmental” concerns. I don’t know who they think they are fooling at this point. The easily frightened are already successfully propagandized. That’s why the narrative from the 80’s and 90’s about personal responsibility (recycling, small cars, thermostat at 65F in winter) has switched to authoritarian central control of personal behavior. It’s going to get interesting.
     
    557, Jan 12, 2020
    #75
    Mrs. b., mngam, Labouroflove and 2 others like this.
Page 3 of 58

Share This Page