SUPREME COURT WILL REVIEW TRUMP TRAVEL BAN, ALLOWS IT TO TAKE EFFECT IN MOST INSTANCES

We also can't because Trump isn't a fascist totalitarian bent on world domination and a master race. His son in law is a Jew. His daughter is a convert to Judaism.

Save yourself.

 

You aren't doing anything here but doubling down on unsupportable nonsense.

 

You can't condemn Islam for keeping non-Muslims out of Mecca, can you?

 

And the left loses once again!!!

 

I don't see how the justices can possibly validate the religious discrimination claims in October, because the only people whom the ban can affect are people who are outside the USA and who do NOT have a bona fide family relationship with a USC or employer. Persons outside the USA are not generally protected by the Constitution.

 

I'd be embarrassed if I had been running my mouth against the President on the ban. Not even Justice Ginsburg, who hates Trump, or the Wise Latina voted against lifting the injunction.

It's interesting that most cases involving injunctive relief do not lead to permanent injunctions, because the parties usually settle if a preliminary injunction is imposed. Looks like this case will die on the vine as moot, I mean before the merits are reached, as the adminstration will have new vetting procedures and drop the blanket ban by the date in October when the Supremes take it up.

 

I think the answer is that it will take regulation and drafting of Operating Instructions, and in turn a public comment period. Takes time.

 

Court to Trump: Go ahead and protect the borders

The Supreme Court showed it still has enough sane members to preserve our democratic republic.

The court rejected the crackpot theory that there is some sort of right to come to America no matter how likely it is that you may blow things up.

The court upheld President Trump's executive order imposing a moratorium on travel from six mostly war-torn countries.

Obviously governments under duress often cannot fully vet the people they give passports to.

Trump has a nation to protect.

From the Associated Press:
The Supreme Court is letting the Trump administration enforce its 90-day ban on travelers from six mostly Muslim countries, overturning lower court orders that blocked it.The court did leave one category of foreigners protected, those "with a credible claim of a bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States," the court said in an unsigned opinion. The justices will hear arguments in the case in October.The action Monday is a victory for President Donald Trump in the biggest legal controversy of his young presidency.Trump said last week that the ban would take effect 72 hours being cleared by courts.Frankly, I want the judges to stop the ability of some Obama-appointed, radicalized judge in Hawaii to arbitrarily halt a president on national security.

But then again, I believe in checks and balances, which we do not have on the judiciary.

This is a temporary victory in a game we should not be playing.

By the way, the moratorium should be over by the time they hear the case.

They can read calendars.

They also can read newspapers, and I doubt they want to accept responsibility for any calamity caused by a constitutionally shady argument that there is a right to a visa.

http://donsurber.blogspot.com/2017/06/court-to-trump-go-ahead-and-protect.html#more

 

Sweet liberal tears.

 

Personally, I would not play this hand this way. I'd keep my hole cards hidden and play the river. If things are looking just right, I'd extend the ban another 12 months. Then another 12, and another.

 

does the president need a public comment period to change regulations? Seems neither the republican house or senate seem to require public comment and hearings to pass legislations these days, so can't see the prez needing it.

 

Yeah, I hear he's making money hand over fist by being president.

OTOH, America doesn't seem to be winning much these days, unless of course you think lies, exaggeration, misrepresentations and stealing credit from others falls under your definition (and donnies) of winning.

Yep donnie is sure winning. CBO just scored the senate healthcare bill. Just imagine 22 million americans winning healthcare - oh wait in this case "winning" must man screwing them outta something so rich people can have a massive tax break.

Your notion of winning seems to be based on stuffing five pounds of shyte into a 1 lb brown paper bag without gushing all over you.

 

You been reading DailyKos again? That's a whole lot of nothing and mindless talking points for all those words you typed.

 

And we have made substantial changes since then with an established government which works closely with our government in the fight against radical Islamist. So your point being what?

 

Yeah like Obama did with his book sales.

 

This is about NOW, not THEN. Saudi Arabia can at least VET its citizens...

 

We need to stop the flow of potential islamists until we feel we can safely vet them, With the EU'sopen borders, it is easy for them to skirt proper vetting. It will take MORE THAN THE US to do the job. Why are you so desperate to import islamist terrorists here?

 

The ban was originally only 90 days, which are long past. Yet the ban has now been approved. Would Trump not be able to reasonably argue for a permanent implementation at this point? It's not like the people in question are any use to the USA.

My own dear countryman, brother of the former leader of the Labour Party and son of arch Marxist Ralph Milliband, is unhappy.

I hope Mr Trump pays the offended Mr Milliband due attention. Then he can tell him to **** off.

 

I'm just going to say 1 thing.

If the 9th Circus strikes something down, it's almost a guarantee it's going to be overturned.

I believe almost 90% of 9th Circus cases that are heard by SCOTUS are overturned. All other hover at around 60%.

 

Most folks would be embarrassed but the left has no shame. I guess they feel the "greater good" they fantasize about is worth the embarrassment.

 

Legally, maybe (the court hasn't reached the merits of the claim, specious in my view, that the ban violates the free exercise clause), but politically, no. He's on record as just wanting a pause.

 

Note that now that the air has been let out of this ban balloon, the libs are off on a new tear: Trump Lies! (See cover of Time.)

"Collusion, no. Obstruction, no. What else we got? Let's dig up his lie about the size of the inauguration crowd."

These "lies" of Trump are what is known as "puffing." Every promoter does it and we all forgive them because we know deep down that we are all of us puffers to some extent.

 

Good. I like money.

If you have some evidence that he's making money illegally, do share. Otherwise, do hush.