Democrat Ilhan Omar wins Minnesota House race

Most Christians would disagree with you.

 

Creeping Sharia is the concern, NOT that literally November 7 we wake up, and say, the women in your family have their naughty parts forcibly removed because Islam/Mohammad support FGM.
https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Qur'an,_Hadith_and_Scholars:Female_Genital_Mutilation

Can you condemn Muslims for approving of a prophet, their best role model for all time, that approved of removing women's body parts as a regular practice? Or are you not very big on women's rights (like the Bible/Qur'an, etc.)?

 

I don't care if Muslims go to Congress. That isn't going to make America Muslim or force silly religious laws on us.

 

Yes, they put this monster (as accurately described by Dawkins, per the Bible itself) above their own nation....insane! Or will they agree with the statement "my god is unethical"?

 

You are very very good at dodging questions, I've learned, so I'll ask again: "Can you condemn Muslims for approving of a prophet, their best role model for all time, that approved of removing women's body parts as a regular practice? Or are you not very big on women's rights (like the Bible/Qur'an, etc.)?"

 

You mean how Muslims amend them every day through teachings because their religions is about more than the Quran?

 

Like the leftists poo-pooing the caravan from Mexico because it was "a thousand miles away, so chill!", leftists don't seem to look towards the FUTURE very much.
No, today we won't have Sharia, but we'll descend to accepting Islamic norms bit by bit by bit, just like the Europeans unfortunately have.

 

What does condemning inanimate objects do?

 

Yes, just like Nazism is "more than" only about, say, liking Hitler - but that doesn't really make it much better, now does it.

I don't find you to be a very ethical person (although you are very smart, I honestly believe) because when asked point blank to condemn, say, the verses in the Qur'an that say that women are inferior to men (Q2:282, etc.), you don't seem to have the compassion (but you are entitled to your opinion - well, until Muslims implement Q9:29, that is) to stand up for innocent women enough to do that. But I hold out hope that you will, someday.

https://quran.com/2/282

 

You are losing this debate, I'm afraid.

 

Please show us where Muslims, in the last 15 years, have found the courage to amend the texts of their religion....say about the parts that say to hate gays.
Thanks.

 

Since you are so obsessed with Sharia LAW, could you link me to the law code or law book of sharia law? It is supposed to be a law right? Laws don't exist without a clear written law code with the intent of it to be a law code. Don't quote the whole Koran because that is not a law code. Don't quote separate verses either because those are not law texts.

 

They have every right to go to congress, we both agree.
It's just that people are being unethical, like you seem to basically be, because they lack the mental courage to simply condemn Muslims for choosing a religion with such barbarity in it.

Example: Islam approves of rape: https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Rape_in_Islam
But of course Christians are no better than Muslims, as the Bible approves of rape: http://www.evilbible.com/evil-bible-home-page/rape-in-the-bible/

 

No females or gay people should be voting for such people. If they DO, then any kind of SJWism they declare is clear lie.

 

The Reliance of The Traveler is a good starting point as seeing what beliefs result from the Islamic texts. As well as the Laws of Saudi Arabia.
Can we agree that Qur'an 4:34 (Shakir) is immoral, MC?

 

So then the amendments to the Constitution don't count and you are evil because you follow something says non-whites only count as 3/5ths a person. Hold yourself to the same standard you expect of theists.

 

Yes, leftists condemn Trump for his hatred of women (which I agree - he's terrible), but then fully embrace Muslims who give their impressionable young children texts that say to stone women to death for sex outside marriage, and say that women are only worth HALF a man. Wow.

 

Please show where, in the last 15 years, you have removed the text from the Constitution states non-whites only count as 3/5ths a person.

 

Let's see the National Organization for Women find the moral courage to condemn Muslims for giving their children texts that say that FGM is ok!!!!! N.O.W. lacks basic ethical standards, obviously.

 

Show me where Muslims have amended the Qur'an in the last 15 years, then we'll talk.
Keep in mind that you are basically running interference for Islamic atrocities in the Islamic texts (and Bible), such as rape, killing gays, torturing Infidels (approved of by Mohammad in the Islamic texts.)

 

Starting point for what? Don't make it more difficult than it has to be. It is simple right? Link me to the "Sharia Law" part in the Koran.

 

Because I'm not an animist?

 

Leftists are clearly often raging hypocrites.

 

No, I'm calling you out for your hatred of theists and your hypocritical refusal to hold yourself to the same standard you hold them to.

Do we need this debate to go down the usual rabbit hole of showing how you condemn theists for holding non-scientific views while you yourself reject science that doesn't conform to your worldview?

 

For Sharia Law to be a menace to the world, there obviously doesn't have to be a chapter entitled "Sharia Law". Come on, dude.
Can you condemn Q2:282, which says women are inferior to men? I can, because I believe I've risen to a higher ethical level than you have - but I hold out hope that you to will rise to a higher ethical standard.