This whole thing that humans can control the climate is absurd. Secondly, even if we could how is anyone going to force all countries to abide.
Turns out she was right in the costs. Look what Europe is going through right now. https://www.foxbusiness.com/politic...y-europes-full-scale-energy-crisis-warning-us how much economic activity would you have to cut back in if our $150 Kw Hour turned into europes $950 Kw hour?
The Resistance has this jerk on the run. Stanford prof appeals order to pay $428K in legal fees after dropping defamation suit Mark Jacobson Mark Jacobson, a Stanford professor who sued a critic and a scientific journal for $10 million but then dropped the case, is appealing a recent court order that he pay the journal’s publisher more than $400,000 in legal fees. Those fees are based on an anti-SLAPP statute, “designed to provide for early dismissal of meritless lawsuits filed against people for the exercise of First Amendment rights.” As we have previously reported, Jacobson: Continue reading
The deep-pocketed dark-money scum who pay for all of Lyin' Michael Mann's bogus lawsuits will probably bail him out.
Meanwhile more stupid ecoloony climate lawsuits fail this one from children who will continue hypocritically use the "fossil fuels" undiminished....... Watts Up With That? Virginia Child Climate Lawsuit Bites the Dust LINK
More alarmist falsehoods exposed. Peer Reviewed Science Journal Report: ‘Electric Utility Industry’s Role in Promoting Climate Denial, Doubt, And Delay Guest Blogger If I had been permitted to fact-check review this paper, I would have barred it for publication because it contains a minimum of six major errors . . .
Ordinary people reacting against climateer fanatics. Fed Up British Drivers Unglue Climate Protestors the Hard Way Eric Worrall Faced with repeated police inaction towards disruptive climate protestors, a handful of British drivers have taken the law into their own hands, dragging “Just Stop Oil” protestors from the streets.
The Resistance speaks up. Potsdam Climate Institute Scientists Criticized: “Scouring For Most Alarmist Stories” By P Gosselin on 23. October 2022 Share this... Climate researcher Björn Stevens, director of the Max Planck Institute (MPI) for Meteorology in Hamburg, criticizes his Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) colleagues, calling them “alarmist” By Die kalte Sonne Björn Stevens is the director of the Max Planck Institute (MPI) for Meteorology in Hamburg and an expert on clouds. In the Zeit (behind paywall), Stevens expresses criticism of colleagues, primarily at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research PIK. The Oldenburger Online Zeitung has taken up the interview and quotes indirectly from it. Among other things, these had warned of the disappearance of all clouds due to global warming. ‘That’s nonsense,’ Stevens said. The scenario is wrong, he said. ‘It’s based on a paper from our institute taken out of context and on a second paper that has numerous flaws.’ The dramatic behavior of the climate in that simulation is based on a gross simplification of clouds that has nothing to do with reality, he said. You can’t get rid of clouds that easily, said Stevens, whose research group simulates clouds in climate models and on whose expertise in cloud issues the world climate report relies heavily. Why his colleagues claimed otherwise, he said, is a question for them to answer. ‘I can only admire the way colleagues there scour the literature for the most alarmist stories.'” But the blasphemy goes even further. ‘But the tipping points that my colleague Hans Joachim Schellnhuber and others at PIK emphasize are based on their private, much weaker definition. They reinterpret tipping points to include less abrupt or even reversible climate changes. With this new definition, they find tipping points everywhere. Then it’s permanent alarm.'”
This is excellent news. How Dare They? Guest Blogger Sweden’s new right-wing government has sparked an outcry after scrapping the Ministry of Environment in a move the opposition has branded “devastating”. . . .
To the barricades! Big Climate Brother Coming Your Way (voluntary now, mandatory later) Guest Blogger …the warning signs are increasing. It is time to expose and resist, politely but firmly.
The Resistance goes to court. CHECC Brief Challenging CO2 Endangerment Finding Now Publicly Available October 25, 2022/ Francis Menton Yesterday the Concerned Household Electricity Consumers Council (CHECC) filed a corrected version of its opening brief challenging the EPA’s Endangerment Finding as to CO2 and other greenhouse gases. The brief can be found here. The bizarre reason for the “corrected” filing was that the clerks at the DC Circuit rejected our initial filing on the ground that we used an excessive number of acronyms. They have a rule encouraging you not to use too many acronyms, but the rule gives no clue as to how many is too many. When you use the term “greenhouse gases” thirty times, should you shorten it to “GHGs,” or write it out every time? You only find out when they bounce the brief and require you to correct it. Anyway, with any luck the linked version is now the final one. When you take a look at the brief, you will see that we are directly and openly challenging the fake science of predicted catastrophic human-caused global warming from GHGs. READ MORE
The Resistance is gaining ground. The climate ‘crisis’ isn’t what it used to be Posted on November 2, 2022 by curryja | 93 comments by Judith Curry Growing realization by the climate establishment that the threat of future warming has been cut in half over the past 5 years. Continue reading →
Whenever there is an open debate, the skeptic wins. Three Climate Debates, Three Wins Andy May Steve Koonin participated in three recent debates of the resolution: “Climate science compels us to make large and rapid reductions in greenhouse gas emissions.” Koonin went three for three! They…
The Resistance will not be silenced. Willie Soon speaks at the University of Chicago Andy May Dr. Willie Soon gave a great presentation at the Federalist Society Chapter at the University of Chicago Law School on November 18, 2022. The title of his…
Dr Jordan Peterson: ‘Stop allowing radicals to exploit you with guilt’ Charles Rotter “You really think all our problem can be reduced to excess carbon dioxide production?”
The Resistance has opened a financial front. Victories against ESG Starting to Accelerate Charles Rotter Using our cash to fund BlackRock’s social-engineering project isn’t something Florida ever signed up for. . . .
The skeptics are winning. Ipsos: Climate Skepticism Rising Three Years in a Row Eric Worrall “… Unexpectedly, climate skepticism has consistently grown over the past 3 years (37%, +6 pts in 3 years), and is particularly striking in France this year (37%, +8 pts in one…
Unexpectedly to whom? The longer and more blatantly the apocalyptic predictions of CO2-centered climate "science" fail, the more sense skepticism -- or outright hostility -- towards the CO2 narrative makes. Some are predicting a cold winter with substantial hardships and millions of fatalities. If that happens, it's going to be hard to sustain the warmist charade -- and then how will the anti-fossil-fuel hysteria mongers apologize?
Apologize? My bet is they keep doubling down. Probably until there's only 2 of them left, really dang angry that nobody ever takes them seriously.
An important voice for climate sanity: JC navigates the new media Posted on December 9, 2022 by curryja | 103 comments by Judith Curry With the new media, it’s astonishing how much trouble a mild-mannered grandmother speaking common sense about climate change can cause without leaving her home. Continue reading →
I posted advice for Dr. Curry to keep full control of her blog because warmists/alarmists are trying to force censorship onto us.
Science once again trumps propaganda. December 13, 2022 More Climate Misinformation and Factual Errors in the Seattle Times. Should You Care? Perhaps I should not read the Seattle Times anymore. During the past weeks, there have been several climate-related stories and opinion/cartoon pieces that are just plain wrong. Clear factual errors, or hyping/exaggerating the impacts of global warming. And there are dozens of additional examples of profound errors in Seattle Times climate pieces over the years, several discussed in this blog. Newspapers should be about communicating the truth, not advocacy of a certain politized viewpoint. The citizens of a democracy must be well informed about important issues of the day, with newspapers playing an important role. As shown below, the Seattle Times is failing in its responsibilities. Worse than that, the Times has suppressed information contradictory to their problematic information. Let me provide some recent examples. Is Climate Change Inundating the Quinault Nation on the Central Washington Coast? It started with an article about how the Feds are providing funds to move a Quilayute Village away from the coast because of climate change: The ST claimed that rising sea level and stronger storms resulting from global warming was the cause. The article is quite specific about this: And the Seattle Times doesn't stop there. Seattle Times editorial cartoonist David Horsey has a "Climate Carol". Nearly all of it is wrong. And he makes the claim about the Quinault village. The ocean is rising and coastlines are sinking from climate change. And yes storms are getting bigger. The problem? None of this is true. And it can be PROVEN not to be true. . . . .
The emergence of resistance fiction: Cli-fi: the net zero sub-genre Posted on December 19, 2022 by curryja | 48 comments by Judith Curry Two exciting new books in climate fiction (Cli-fi), with net zero themes. Continue reading →
The quiet resistance of science teachers. Claim: Climate Change is Being Downgraded in University Textbooks Eric Worrall There is evidence university science teachers might be deliberately skipping over climate indoctrination. . . .
It remains important to speak the truth. Being Disagreeable – At Christmas December 24, 2022 By jennifer 17 Comments It is increasingly difficult to articulate a sceptical perspective on catastrophic human-caused climate change and other such issues. Not only with colleagues, but also within extended families. This is especially the case at Christmas time when … [Read more...]