The electoral college needs to go, its broken and only serves to disenfranchise voters

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Sackeshi, Jul 10, 2019.

  1. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    47,848
    Likes Received:
    19,639
    Trophy Points:
    113
    People have the right to vote for whomever they want - and thus, virtually unlimited choices.
    Nothing can do this.
     
    Last edited: Jul 11, 2019
  2. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    47,848
    Likes Received:
    19,639
    Trophy Points:
    113

    Wholly and completely unnecessary.
     
  3. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    47,848
    Likes Received:
    19,639
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Par for the course.
     
  4. fmw

    fmw Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2009
    Messages:
    38,324
    Likes Received:
    14,771
    Trophy Points:
    113
    None of it makes sense. For example, I live in rural red america and make my living operating a small e-commerce company that I started 21 years ago. Others who live in my area are a veterinarian, an owner of a truck service business, an owner of a flooring company and even a few farmers. None of us interface much with any kind of government but appreciate that it is there. It is a matter of freedom really. City people want safety and convenience and are willing to give up a lot of freedom to have it. Out here we want freedom and are willing to give up safety and convenience to have it. We don't have fast internet or cable TV or even natural gas. We also don't have traffic, drug deals, homeless and noise. Two Americas and neither should interfere with the other.

    Since more people live in big cities than out here in the country the entire red part of the US would have to live under big city rules with no say in it. We all need federal government. We just need a lot less of it. Then it won't matter so much to the city people.
     
  5. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    47,848
    Likes Received:
    19,639
    Trophy Points:
    113
    :lol:
    Funny! Good one!!
    :lol:
     
  6. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,427
    Likes Received:
    8,812
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So it has nothing to do with the present.
     
  7. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,427
    Likes Received:
    8,812
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That’s hilarious. Which cities and states are uncivilized ??? Which cities and states are civilized ???
     
    Last edited: Jul 11, 2019
  8. WillReadmore

    WillReadmore Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2013
    Messages:
    59,879
    Likes Received:
    16,452
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Something is necessary.

    Representation today is nowhere close to equal.
     
  9. HB Surfer

    HB Surfer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2009
    Messages:
    34,707
    Likes Received:
    21,899
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Damn. This is such a damn stupid post and wholly un-American.

    Why it is so damn stupid?

    If you and I play chess and I take out your King, but you suddenly jump up and say, NOPE! NOPE! I took more of your pieces, I should be the winner, does that make sense to you? A popular vote contest was not being waged. If it was, Trump would have campaigned in California, New York, and Illinois. NO ONE knows what that outcome would have been, because no one fought that fight. I could have targeted more of your chess pieces, if that was the game being played, but it was not. It's a fool's argument to claim Hillary's popular vote makes Trump illegitimate. NO ONE was trying to win the Popular Vote, because it doesn't matter.
    Why is it un-American?

    The U.S. Constitutions largest, most specific and detailed portion is the part on the Electoral College. Article 2, Section 1, and the 12th Amendment were vital to the formation of the United States of America. Without the Electoral College as designed, we would have no nation. If we take it out, then we will.... HAVE NO NATION. We will fracture and the remaining "nation" will dissolve as pure Democracy means an end to Private Property rights, which is another foundation of this nation. Also, the states that decide to remain will forfeit leadership to urban areas. The food producers, raw material producers, etc. will have no say in Presidential leadership and you will have disenfranchised them completely.

     
    AFM likes this.
  10. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    42,139
    Likes Received:
    32,978
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Most of the nation was not for trump, most of the states were. Two very different things.
    You either believe in equality or you don’t.

    Yes, I am totally sure the founders who believed in slavery, not allowing women to vote only male landowners and in counting people as 2/5’s of a person counted on “media bias” as reasoning for their actions. Ffs


    Look at all that vacant land that voted for trump!
     
  11. kriman

    kriman Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2018
    Messages:
    27,282
    Likes Received:
    11,148
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Not a single acre of land voted for Trump.
     
  12. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,427
    Likes Received:
    8,812
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That’s hilarious. Excluding California Trump won the popular vote.
     
  13. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,427
    Likes Received:
    8,812
    Trophy Points:
    113
    According to one poster the red land is uncivilized.
     
  14. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    42,139
    Likes Received:
    32,978
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I wasn’t referring to white voters, I was referring to the ‘silent generation’ and evangelicals.

    But ok...
     
  15. Just A Man

    Just A Man Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2009
    Messages:
    12,497
    Likes Received:
    9,511
    Trophy Points:
    113
    To those who want to abolish the EC -- why not stop voting for a president and just let the gov of California and the gov of NY pick the prez. It would be the same thing.
     
  16. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    42,139
    Likes Received:
    32,978
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    1) I don’t have a party, my past votes have leaned conservative if anything

    2) Your sad attempt to dodge the point is noted
     
  17. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    42,139
    Likes Received:
    32,978
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I wonder if you would have had the same position on slavery or women not being allowed to vote, “well it’s the law and how it’s always been done so oh well...”
     
    Last edited: Jul 11, 2019
  18. Socratica

    Socratica Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2019
    Messages:
    1,075
    Likes Received:
    382
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Female
    That's a complete non-sequitur...
     
  19. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    42,139
    Likes Received:
    32,978
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Excluding states that receive more in federal taxpayer support than they give Clinton won both the EC and NPV. You could also exclude the states with the lowest GDP or lowest in educational ranking for the same result.

    What’s your point?
     
  20. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    42,139
    Likes Received:
    32,978
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It's really not. Justifying a law by saying that’s the law isn’t really justification.
     
  21. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    42,139
    Likes Received:
    32,978
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The people on the land just had their votes multiplied due to all of the vacant land around them.

    Same difference
     
  22. Socratica

    Socratica Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2019
    Messages:
    1,075
    Likes Received:
    382
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Female
    It's only justification in your mind. It's a law; everyone agreed to abide by it. If you have a problem with it, you can either: a) try to change it, or b) worked within the system.

    If you've done the former or the latter, you have no grounds to complain, especially when you lose.
     
    Last edited: Jul 11, 2019
  23. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    47,848
    Likes Received:
    19,639
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Most of the nation was also not for Clinton.
     
  24. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    42,139
    Likes Received:
    32,978
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I never said they were, what’s your point?

    Also, please don’t edit my posts down to take things out of context, it calls your integrity into question.
    Thanks in advance.
     
  25. Socratica

    Socratica Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2019
    Messages:
    1,075
    Likes Received:
    382
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Female
    Based on the framing of that sentence, it's implied.
     
    Last edited: Jul 11, 2019

Share This Page