The internet thought it found the Trump whistleblower's picture. The internet was wrong

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Andrew Jackson, Nov 8, 2019.

  1. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It also provides hundreds of pages of details where Trump and his campaign encouraged and benefitted from illegal Russian interference that was specifically designed to benefit Trump.
     
  2. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And then he specifically said no one coordinated with Russians.
     
    Iron_Merc likes this.
  3. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think i've discovered your guys problem: reading comprehension.

    Just like with the transcript call, you seem to see words that do not exist in the above quote.

    The phrase "lack of sufficient evidence" is nowhere to be found, other than in your imagination.
     
  4. Iron_Merc

    Iron_Merc Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2019
    Messages:
    923
    Likes Received:
    437
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    Is English not your primary language? Not sure why I have to spell this out for you... When an investigation fails to find evidence of wrongdoing the person in question gains credibility. And we can conclude:

    a) Trump did not collude with the Russians
    b) The investigation was purely political in nature (just like the impeachment hoax or the Trump foundation 2m payout)
    c) Investigate the investigators
    d) This is just another example of character assignation perpetrated by the liberal left
    e) Tens of millions of taxpayer dollars wasted
    f) The investigation was a fishing expedition
    g) Russia-Trump collusion hoax was ordered by Obama himself
    h) Russians have been influencing our elections for decades now
    I) Trump didn't need any help, he would have throttled Hillary all the same
    j) Trump is exonerated and we can put the issue of collusion to bed


    [​IMG]

    Can you please explain this so called "Russian interference"? I know Russians have been trying to influence our elections for decades now, but what method did they use this time around?

    For everyone who still believes there was Russia - Trump collusion:

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Nov 12, 2019
  5. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Boy it does not take you long to go from a semi-rational conclusion to a completely batshit conspiracy theory.

    You even quote the Trump foundation 2 million payout where Trump EXPLICITLY ADMITTED FAULT.

    Welcome to ignore.
     
    Last edited: Nov 12, 2019
  6. Iron_Merc

    Iron_Merc Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2019
    Messages:
    923
    Likes Received:
    437
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    Im still curious, what exactly did the Russians do to influence the election?
     
  7. Iron_Merc

    Iron_Merc Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2019
    Messages:
    923
    Likes Received:
    437
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    Every penny went to charity. But you wont hear about that from your liberal news source.
    News flash - the Trump Foundation actually gave out more money than it took in.

    Probably didn't hear that from your liberal news source.

    Its all part of the political assassination directed at Donald Trump.

    Trump Foundation lawyer Alan Futerfas said the nonprofit has distributed approximately $19 million over the past decade, including $8.25 million of the president’s own money. Plus the judge admitted that the money was paid out... lol

    Im not saying that it's ethical to use a foundation for alternative purposes, but when you contribute over $8 million to the cause those technicalities seem less significant.

    The left is also trying to paint a picture like Trump was fined 2 million dollars. This couldnt be farther from the Truth. Trump wanted the Foundation dissolved as well and his original intent was to distribute the remaining funds to charity before closing up shop. Trump is probably the only person in history to be taken to court for donating over 19 million dollars to charities.

    Side note - Trump doesn't take a salary. Thats $400,000 a year back to the people.

    You want corruption? Look no further than the Clinton Foundation.
     
  8. Dispondent

    Dispondent Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2009
    Messages:
    34,260
    Likes Received:
    8,086
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So that's why you folks are trying to impeach Trump on hearsay about a phone to the Ukraine? Nothing to do with Russia or 'collusion' or anything else you folks whined about for two years. That says EXONERATION!
     
  9. Daniel Light

    Daniel Light Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2015
    Messages:
    31,455
    Likes Received:
    34,888
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ttump does take a salary, he just spends it by giving it to charity- that money doesn’t go back into the treasury. It doesn’t go back to taxpayers.
     

Share This Page