The public sees through Trump’s national emergency lies. A new poll confirms it.

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Doug_yvr, Feb 19, 2019.

  1. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sure. An overwhelming minority of the public.
     
  2. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    He knows that. He just repeats the same pathetic talking point everytime he sees a survey.

    Hey @guavaball , the 2018 midterms "oversampled" Democrats by 8.7%, lol.
     
  3. ocean515

    ocean515 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2015
    Messages:
    17,908
    Likes Received:
    10,396
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Why should I do that?

    The President of the United States has within the mandate of his office, the power to declare a National Emergency when the circumstances merit.

    I don't care that the open border radical left doesn't want anyone to stop the invasion they are encouraging. I don't care that fact means they must declare no emergency exists. I find it ironic they try this meme when they've been promoting a "crisis on the border" for the last couple of years.

    Why don't you elaborate on how this action sets a precedent, and what that precedent means long term.

    So far, I've been reading a bunch of uninformed BS from people who don't have a clue. Oh, a President could declare a NE on guns and go and grab them all. That's ridiculous, but I see it all the time.
     
  4. Spooky

    Spooky Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2013
    Messages:
    31,814
    Likes Received:
    13,377
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And it's hilarious that they picked San Francisco to file it in.

    Do you wonder why that is?

    Because they have no case but they know that region's court is sympathetic to liberals, they always rule against Trump and the Supreme Court will laugh it away on appeal.
     
  5. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    How can he be setting a precedent? He is using the same authority Congress gave Presidents that has been used 58 times before. Hardly a precedent. Also the complaint that the wall is not necessary is weak since Congress just voted for wall funding.

    Trump has about $5 billion to spend before he ever gets to the funds available through the National Emergency declaration.
     
    ocean515 and Spooky like this.
  6. Spooky

    Spooky Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2013
    Messages:
    31,814
    Likes Received:
    13,377
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They can't do the same thing for single payer.

    Declaring a national emergency is very specific in the powers it gives to the president.

    Read up on this please and quit embarrassing yourself.

    Now if democrats want to build a wall somewhere then sure, they could do what Trump did but they will not be authorized to institute health care under a national emergency, it doesn't grant them that power.
     
  7. Spooky

    Spooky Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2013
    Messages:
    31,814
    Likes Received:
    13,377
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Like talking to a wall isn't it?
     
  8. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Meh, TDS does not allow rational thought.
     
    Spooky likes this.
  9. Egoboy

    Egoboy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2017
    Messages:
    44,763
    Likes Received:
    32,099
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Always possible, but I predict all D's in both chambers will vote against this NATIONAL EMERGENCY.

    This is Manchin when he thought that a NATIONAL EMERGENCY declaration would re-open the goverment.

    https://www.wvgazettemail.com/news/...cle_49781982-9f6e-5464-8fdf-43d8fd9826d9.html

    But this declaration wasn't made to open the government. I think Manchin will toe the line here.... the divisions will all be on the R side
     
    Gorgeous George likes this.
  10. Spooky

    Spooky Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2013
    Messages:
    31,814
    Likes Received:
    13,377
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If they do then that's fine, that is their power over the president.

    Don't look for the courts to stop Trump however because they rarely interfere when congress has the power themselves.

    That's just American history.
     
  11. Blaster3

    Blaster3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2018
    Messages:
    6,008
    Likes Received:
    5,302
    Trophy Points:
    113
    and we'll point out that thr 'norm' for midterms has been a complete turn around of both the house & senate and that didnt occur in '18 ;)
     
  12. Egoboy

    Egoboy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2017
    Messages:
    44,763
    Likes Received:
    32,099
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I can agree with that.... I think most of the court challenges should be considered plan B, although some will have standing and merit... Congress has the power to nip this in the bud, and quickly...

    Bush Junior bailed on his attempt at a bogus National Emergency claim in 2005... We'll see if Trump wants to genuinely put his party at risk with actual votes on this.... I suspect he doesn't give a ****...

    SNIP
    "It can be revealing when you make people vote on something,"
    ENDSNIP

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...mp-border-wall-congress-oversight/2784488002/
     
  13. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The House could start it but then it depends if it would ever hit the floor of the Senate. If it did, then it would have to be a veto proof super majority.
     
  14. Egoboy

    Egoboy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2017
    Messages:
    44,763
    Likes Received:
    32,099
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    My research says it HAS to hit the floor of the Senate... by law... Not Mitchy the Kids call on that one...

    And you keep thinking like McConnell... this isn't like a lawyer only asking questions he knows the answer to.... Sometimes you have to put something to a vote where you simply aren't guaranteed a result.. the votes will speak for themselves... Same with McConnell saying he'll bring the Green New Deal to the floor (still waiting on that one)... He doesn't know what the final vote is going to be on that...

    I'm reasonably sure, just based on many R Senate comments, that the Senate would support the Joint Resolution (by simple majority)... That would force a veto... The question then is does either chamber attempt a veto override? Dunno...
     
    MrTLegal likes this.
  15. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It may have to hit the floor, I don't know, but then it would still take a veto proof majority and that is far from assured.
     
    Last edited: Feb 20, 2019
  16. Mac-7

    Mac-7 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2011
    Messages:
    86,664
    Likes Received:
    17,636
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The legal challenges should be thrown out of court

    This is a fight between congress and the executive branch

    The unelected liberal judges should not get involved
     
  17. Mac-7

    Mac-7 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2011
    Messages:
    86,664
    Likes Received:
    17,636
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I suspect mcconnell will allow a vote on the resolution

    But I disagree that he has to let it come up for a vote
     
  18. Egoboy

    Egoboy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2017
    Messages:
    44,763
    Likes Received:
    32,099
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Disagree on thrown out summarily... but see my thoughts on the court challenges in post #62
     
  19. Mac-7

    Mac-7 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2011
    Messages:
    86,664
    Likes Received:
    17,636
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If congress does not repeal its law or override trump then the issue is settled and the court should stay out of it
     
  20. Egoboy

    Egoboy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2017
    Messages:
    44,763
    Likes Received:
    32,099
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    This is the actual law and it's hard to read, but I think it's true that if one side passes it, the other side has to have a vote on it within 18 days..

    SNIP
    Such a joint resolution passed by one House shall be referred to the appropriate committee of the other House and shall be reported out by such committee together with its recommendations within fifteen calendar days after the day on which such resolution is referred to such committee and shall thereupon become the pending business of such House and shall be voted upon within three calendar days after the day on which such resolution is reported, unless such House shall otherwise determine by yeas and nays.
    ENDSNIP

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/1622

    I'm sure McConnell is researching ways to bypass this as we speak.

    Put Neidermeyer on it. He's a sneaky little ****, right?
     
    MrTLegal likes this.
  21. Mac-7

    Mac-7 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2011
    Messages:
    86,664
    Likes Received:
    17,636
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think mcconnell with allow a vote

    And if so the question of being forced to is mute
     
  22. Egoboy

    Egoboy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2017
    Messages:
    44,763
    Likes Received:
    32,099
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Once again, if it's in the law he has to, you cannot claim he will "allow" a vote...

    Average try to make McConnell appear human, which we know he's not..
     
    MrTLegal likes this.
  23. Zorro

    Zorro Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    77,029
    Likes Received:
    51,740
    Trophy Points:
    113
    A hater and slanderer of Christians, how novel! With 80% of the immigrant women and children being raped during the process of illegally crossing the border, of course evangelical Christians want these illegal rape routes shutdown. Maybe if they were White Women and Girls being raped, the Left would give a damn?
     
  24. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The law gives a President very much power and tells Congress that it may meet every six months to determine to terminate it. That has never been done much less meeting every six months and there are now 30 NE in effect.
     
  25. Egoboy

    Egoboy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2017
    Messages:
    44,763
    Likes Received:
    32,099
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Adalberto Mondesi (SS-KC) is very likely going to hit 20 HRs and steal 50 bases in 2019....
     

Share This Page