The vaccine causes deadly blood clots.

Hilarious. You think I posted that for your benefit? @Bowerbird remarked that horseshit was useful on roses, so I posted an ironic analysis showing viruses found in it.

Let me make my position clear. Your claim that "viruses don't exist" is almost as insane as the Flat Earth. I have NO INTEREST in "debating" it with you. In fact, I have no interest in anything you have thus far posted.

I have no idea at all how anyone can believe this virus-laden horseshit, let alone why they would spam it across every thread they post in. You must know that nobody is going to be taken in by this, so what is the objective?

 

Duh...I know you posted that from Bowerbird's 'horseshit' remark. I just wanted to be sure that you know it's another bogus 'study' in case you or she ever wanted to use it in the future. Your post was actually fitting, considering that virology is a bunch of horseshit.

So you'd rather post claims & make up theories that have no scientific basis? What's the objective in that?

Advice: First look at the science before you post flaky claims. If the science isn't there, expect to be debunked.

Because someone is always listening with an open ear - and can be benefited.

 

Your claim that "viruses don't exist" is almost as insane as the Flat Earth. I have NO INTEREST in "debating" it with you. In fact, I have no interest in anything you have thus far posted.

Ridiculous. "Open ear" to written batshit?

 

They don't have to take my word for it. But my posts can compel them to look deeper at the science rather than blindly falling for the govt-big pharma 'virus/vaccine/pandemic' hype. Unfortunately, most folks would rather believe a spoon-fed narrative than to question it.

 

Hmmm looking deeper at the science shows the conspiracy is horseshit, laden with viruses!

 

At the 1:13:15 time mark of this video a discussion on blood clots begins.

Dr. Bryan Ardis: Exposing the Vaccine Agenda - Cancer & COVID Therapy Revealed in This Podcast!
https://rumble.com/v5d2uw9-dr.-brya...e-agenda-cancer-and-covid-therapy-reveal.html


Dr. Ardis says that the cure for blood clots is licorice root and cinnamon.

He talks about snake venom at the beginning of the video but he later makes it clear that it's synthetic snake venom.


I'm not saying I simply believe all of this. I'm just posting it so it can be discussed.

 

The viewers are now wondering where this endless supply of useless links is going to end!

The first one is implicated in causing strokes, the second has anticoagulant properties. AND?

For what?

To what end!?

 

Here's something I came across about the theory that there are no viruses.

The fallacies of the “no virus” doctrine
https://doctors4covidethics.org/the-fallacies-of-the-no-virus-doctrine/
(excerpt)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
The idea that the existence of pathogenic viruses is “not proven” is nonsense. If you take it literally, then it is trivial, because in empirical science nothing can ever be proven once and for all. If you measure it by how well it agrees with the known observations, then it falls flat, as the few examples discussed here sufficiently show, which largely or at least partially conform to the rules stipulated by the virus skeptics.

But the fundamental issue is, of course, with those arbitrary restrictions that the virus skeptics want to impose on mainstream virologists. There are simply no rational arguments against the use of cell cultures for the detection of viruses, any more than there are against the use of solid culture media in bacteriology. The same applies to modern methods for the detection of viral nucleic acid sequences in cell cultures or in sample materials. Like all other methods, these can of course also be misused. Such misuse is objectionable, but a fundamental ban on the methods as such is unjustified.

The whole “proof procedure” devised by the virus skeptics has nothing to do with real science. Rather, it is reminiscent of the swimming test that used to be applied to those suspected of witchcraft. The limbs of the unfortunates were tied up and they were then lowered into the water; if they were still able to swim, their guilt was considered proven. If the virus skeptics have their way, then virologists should also submit to being tied up. If, contrary to expectations, they should still able to swim, this would certainly be ascribed to witchcraft.

I prefaced this article with a quote from Karl Popper. Another one fits here at the end: “The survival value of intelligence is that it allows us to extinct a bad idea, before the idea extincts us.” The “no virus” doctrine is nothing more than one of these bad ideas.

 

More on the clots issue...
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/embalmers-keep-finding-fibrous-cv19

 

Same crap different source( of batshit).
The go-look-at-my-link method that has no informed commentary to guide whoever the hell you're trying to convince.

 

All you need to do is address what's said. There are more links below the article. I'm mainly posting this stuff for the viewers to check out. They can look at the info and form opinions without my help.

 

What? Like the way you address what is addressed!?

Repackaged spam.

Really? You think you're making a difference do you?

Probably way better too. Consider not providing any, huh?

 

I put this one on the wrong thread.
http://politicalforum.com/index.php...e-causes-cancer.622137/page-4#post-1075295732