Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Patricio Da Silva, Sep 23, 2020.
Durham isn't finished yet.
Yep he sure did...."great economy" for the 1%.
The discussion was how both candidates are unsuited, not that one's acts excuse the other's. Ontological thinking may be required for understanding the posts.
Define what you mean by "conservative" and "liberal," and I'll give you a laundry list. I just need to know which you consider to be which so the list is sorted correctly.
The sad part is that it took only one man to dismantle American democracy; Donald Trump. (Apart from his demented followers, who created his cult, and ordinary citizens who could not sense the trap of fascism.)
We've been here before.
If history could speak what would it say?
Something like; Jeez, not again!
For me it feels America right now (and therefore the world) is driving on the wrong side of the road, straight into oncoming traffic, going 200 km per hour......
And then still hope you don't make an accident?
It can not end well.
It can only be noted that Trump is not solely responsible; he has had a lot of 'help', and much groundwork was already laid.
We do, we just don't have the extra step between comprehension and application that you do. See, we saw what he said and understand it. You see what he says, understand it too I'm sure, but then spin it in your head so that it fits your view of him. Therein lies your problem.
The words are the words. Weve already got 6 pages of hysterical liberal spin.
With 6 pages of Trump supporter fantasy along with them.
Ah but you have no factual evidence to back that up. Listen pally, Trump says "we'll have to wait and see" whether he will accept the outcome of the election. That is not debatable. He said it. It's fact. But you don't seem to know that it is not his job to make such a determination. There is no provision in the Constitution for the president to determine whether an election is valid or not. That would be a case of asking the fox to guard the henhouse. So he has no right to even say it. To do so is to undermine the public faith in our system.
And this is what the elimination of the Fairness Doctrine and the Equal Time Rule begets.
I looked at the video and thought it was a bit of a loaded question. The guy was asking if there would be a peaceful transfer and citing lack of peace to be all the current rioting etc. The question implies that it would be Trump supporters doing the rioting, yet the example of the rioting actually mentioned were leftists.
It was a very messy and convoluted question and answer and I thought the Don was deflecting more than anything
No need, because rather than SAY it, Democrats DO it.
Nope. Not a valid reply. Trump said he didn't agree to accept the results "last time" and he won't agree to it this time either. That means he intends to pass judgement on a decision that isn't his to judge. And it means, or strongly suggests, that he will accept the outcome ONLY if he wins.
Trump gave an "answer" totally unsuitable coming from the President.
That is exactly what happens when someone totally unworthy of the dignity (or respect) of the office is Mistakenly Elected (in an Electoral Fluke).
Trump should never have been elected in the first place.
And the USA has had to suffer through almost 4 years of Trump's daily degradation of the dignity of the office.
Trump is a Tinfoil Hat Imbecile who never should have been elected in the first place.
Our only fantasy is that one day liberals will quit being ridiculous.
OIC, OK Sorry
And we hope voters like yourself will vote with country in mind, not political and social spite.
Thats why Im voting for Trump. Based on what Ive seen from the left lately America can not tolerate much more of their rioting. Biden/Harris has nothing to offer the average middle class working person.
Actually...tRump didn't give anything to "the average middle class working person" either.
So you wouldn't be missing a thing....except maybe the continuous chaos of the tRump regime.
The only chaos is being caused by democrats. Its all they have left.
He said if ballots weren't included there would be a continuation. Meaning he will win based on a physical vote which is probably true.
I agree it's a poor reply. He'll try every dirty trick I'm sure.
My adrenaline didn't spike in outrage for his reply as much as I was expecting
Don't give Sweet Potato Hitler the credit. He's just the symptom of a disease that had been festering. We had the SCOTUS choose a POTUS and got stuck with Bush. That was not a good sign.
No matter how you spin it....it is still all happening on tRump's watch. And recorded history will give him all the credit he deserves...
right down to the last tweet.
Separate names with a comma.