They Know Who Won: Thoroughly Defeated Democrats Urge Joe Biden to Cancel Future Debates

Of course not..it hurts his people, the white supremacist. He supports violence from his side.

Just not right now. He just needs them to stand down.

 

Election hasn't happened yet.

 

The video of the little group of DP campaign staff meeting his train is also very telling, but the Twitter censors obviously did not realize how bad it looks.

 

Then the MSM is the ones you need to blame for all the exposer If Trump was to sit in a dark room 24/7 and say nothing the Media would bark about that too

If that helps you define the real problem then, YOUR WELCOME

 

..Its not the medias fault Trump does dumb s$%t.
Thats like blaming those meddling kids for ruining nefarious plans.

 

Oh Golly what was I thinking, the media couldn't have anything to do with the information you are bombarded with, SORRY ¯\_(º¸º)_/¯

 

Any time you want to back that hallucination with reputable proof, just let us know. You allege something and then back straight out in the next post. That says you really need to up your game.

 

You assume im suseptible to spin?
Well, i can only tell you that im experienced enough to always seek alternate sources of media material. And when multiple competing sources report someone doing the same thing..chances are that person is doing that thing.

 

Hes said it himself..His people, support him, His people are so smart..then he told them to stand down.

 

Nah, it's not like Calvin Woodward at the AP is a Trump fan or anything. Or his entire coworking staff. Then there's the urinalists working at the New York Slimes, who can't even interpret a story properly about Trump's tax payments, and got it SOOOOOOO wrong it might rank as this century's best example of how not to edit a news story.

Reuters? Not much better. Crisply anti-Trump. Not that they ever much cared for the U.S. to begin with. The English edition of Der Spiegel? Ditto, no Limbaugh implied.

Even Nolan Finley at the Detroit News is going soft in the head and likes leftist causes---bad idea at that formerly terrific conservative paper.


Meanwhile, the number of small newspapers is dropping and remaining papers are gobbled up in corporate journalism where top-down editorial policy may not be brazenly public but any editor wishing to hold their job better follow those guidelines, whatever they are. And those same corporate papers like Gatehouse do not like Donald Trump.

 

Untrue, I didnt mention spin propaganda or anything other then,

So now you will have me believe you are on point when ever you experience Media and other sources of information

 

Link?

 

I watched Star Trek last night and will be back from my Mars vacation on Tuesday.
Riiiiiiight.

 

Quite true. Joe hasn't gone out to meet his ten supporters yet.

 

So the US taxpayer is paying to provide a backdrop to President Trump's re election rallies?

 

To what...a compilation of all his talks?
No, you make that your self, wtf that would take hours. Just combine the youtube video of when he said he could shoot someone on fifth avenue, and they would still support him with the debate last night.

There's your literal link.

Edit:




There ya go.

 

I think if one is honest, the fiasco called the first debate just reinforced the perceptions of the candidates among those who already have made up their minds on who they'll be voting for a month from now. It did nothing to influence the undecided's or those who state they'll be voting third party which are a heck of a lot fewer this year than in 2016. Approximately half, 15% on 30 Sep 2016, 8% 30 Sep 2020.

I'd say neither candidate came out better or worse then when they went in. Just a whole lot of folks saying the whole affair called a debate was disgusting. In my opinion, the debate neither helped nor hurt either candidate, just added to the strength of conviction each individual supporter of each candidate had and still has.

 

.

 

I took it exactly opposite, that the censors DID realize how bad it looked. Which it did for Biden and very good for Trump. For me the censorship itself is very telling. Libs are terrified and their efforts are now in the maniacal-frenzy stage in this last rush to Game Day. Their riots backfired, they've shot their bolt.

Now it is up to Joe Biden to convince young Democrats he can even remember they exist, while former prosecutor and wildly-disliked Kamalalalala Harris tries to convince people she would not be worse than Obama if she did sleaze her way into the White House.

We are watching a non-campaign pretend to be a campaign. We are watching Donald Trump's reelection, riding an Amtrak train through Rust country.

 

The U.S. taxpayer pays for the plane and the base it is housed and serviced at, yes.
Guess how many such bases are within easy driving range of the White House. As President, it's his base.
Say hi to Tom Cruise on that Top Gun remake. Or the Stargate crowd and their enduring, almost incestuous Air Force relationship (brigadier-general actors?). Our military has always cooperated that way.

 

The fight between our corrupt Deep State and all it's minions against Donald Trump is an unfair contest.

"Democrats’ vocalization of a sense of helplessness was particularly acute at the end of an embarrassing week that underscored how the Trump administration has been able to run circles around their investigations....

“As president, he just overwhelms us,” lamented Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.), a former 2020 presidential candidate. “I mean, you’ve got kids in cages — we’re trying to deal with that. We’ve got the continued mass shootings, and he won’t help us with that. And then you’ve got the urgency of this [oversight]. So, I mean, it’s really just kind of, where do you prioritize your resources and your time?”
THE WASHINGTON POST, Trump’s Ukraine call reveals a president convinced of his own invincibility, By Phillip Rucker, Robert Costa, Rachel Bade, 9/23/19.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...convinced-of-his-own-invincibility/ar-AAHE1OK

 

I don't mind butting in either when grievous lies are being .. ah.. repeated yet again.

 

Well, I have trouble with statements which want ME to research what could be a blind alley leading to wasted hours I'd sooner spend thrashing liberals. Can you succinctly make the case for your, um, assertion?

 

Nor I, young man, nor I.

 

We elect one man to take the blame and hold the reins, not necessarily in that order. We do not elect a weakling social agitator in mom jeans with dipping ice cream as his only real job running our economy.

...Well, we did but now thankfully he's just a loud mouth trying to honor his $64 million book advance...for his two-volume THIRD autobiography. Take out the personal pronouns, make that a supermarket flier.

Now comes a businessman long-accustomed to juggling multiple issues under often stressful situations, fast-enough mentally and physically presentable-enough to be a TV host, and next thing anyone knows his name is mentioned all over New Yawk and its own terribly insular TV colony...then mentioned nationally...and gadzooks, here that guy wants to be President.

It took years to get famous and a run for Prez in politics to get infamous. And dang, is he good at poking that flaming stick into those liberal cages, just to tease the inmates!

Look who he ran against. And won out over. Donald John Trump saved America.