This Didn't Age Well! Rachel Maddow's Recent Hospital Ship Prediction Sinks To Fake News Depths

And if they DID, their movements would've been traced and we would know if any of these 400 thousand spread the virus when they returned to the US, but I'm guessing you have no evidence of that!

I'm not blaming Democrats for anything, I'm simply saying that they had no problem with those 400 thousand getting back to where they live!

So ANYTHING that someone says under oath must be the truth! Ever heard of Bill Clinton?

Sure, just like it hasn't been proven that he KEPT it!

Except that Fauci said that he was NOT ignored, after appearing to tell Tapper the opposite! And that was after telling a national TV audience in February that people didn't need to change anything about their lives!

Yes, because we don't know if they WOULD have been saved! Fauci only says that OBVIOUSLY lives COULD have been saved!

 

I'm guessing you have no prove those 400.000 were being traced.

You are shifting the attention to who is not in charge and who is not responsible.

All you got are some tweets that it aint so. You can't prove your point.

Fauci said he wanted social and physical distancing in the 3rd week of February.
So it's obvious he was ignored when Donald did that a month later.
https://edition.cnn.com/videos/politics/2020/04/12/sotu-fauci-pushback.cnn

You keep contesting Fauci.

You're not commenting on the issue that NOBODY WOULD DENY lives could be saved.
You are contesting with this word play.

 

Why would they be traced if they didn't have the virus?

No, STATEMENTS from the Department! That's NOT Twitter!

Fauci said that what he wanted in February is what came on March 16. Fauci said that what came on March 16, came after the first time that he and Birks recommended it. And this was after Fauci told a national TV audience in February that people didn't need to change anything about their lives!

I AGREE that NOBODY WOULD DENY lives could be saved!

So, you mean prove a NEGATIVE?

 

if.... lol.... if ... lol
So much for that keeping the virus out.

whatever... aint under oath. Such a weak response.

So he got ignored for weeks. Like I said weeks ago.

It's Bright, and he wanted social distancing in January. That would be according him what the US playbook says and was ignored.

And they weren't.... since Donald ignored his experts.

Up to you to debunk him.

 

Rachel is transitioning well. Soon she can earn extra money as a Chris O'Donnell impersonator.

 

They look alike?

 

If these returned travelers tested positive, then their movements would've been traced and we would know if any of these 400 thousand spread the virus when they returned to the US, but I'm guessing you have no evidence of that!

So you only accept statements made under oath! I guess you didn't accept anything that Obama said then when he wasn't under oath! (which was most of the time obviously!)

Fauci said that what came on March 16, came after the FIRST TIME that he and Birks recommended it. That doesn't sound like "ignored" to me! And this was after Fauci told a national TV audience in February that people didn't need to change anything about their lives!

So NOT Fauci? Just Bright? You seriously have lost it now!

Has it been proven that he KEPT it?

 

When they were both younger

 

Yeah. I asked you to source that they were tracked. And you never came up with anything.

Yup. I accept statements under oath above the ones who are published on twitter or on some memo.

I sourced that aint the case in post 602.

Nope. Both!

That's up to you if that's your argument.

 

I didn't say that they were TRACKED, I said that they WOULD HAVE been TRACED (not tracked) - IF they tested positive.

Again, Bright was giving his OPINION on why he was fired. He was NOT saying that he WAS fired for that reason.
An OPINION cannot be a LIE, therefore giving an opinion isn't more significant when under oath than not being under oath.

And I sourced that it IS the case in post 359! Right here: http://www.politicalforum.com/index...ke-news-depths.570427/page-15#post-1071634868

https://video.foxnews.com/v/6149149777001#sp=show-clips

"The first and only time that Dr. Birx and I went in and formally made a recommendation to the President to actually have a, quote, "shutdown" in the sense of - not really "shutdown" but to really have strong mitigation, we discussed it. Obviously, there would be concern by some that, in fact, that might have some negative consequences. Nonetheless, the President listened to the recommendation and went to the mitigation. The next second time that I went with Dr. Birx in - to the President and said, "Fifteen days are not enough. We need to go thirty days," obviously, there were people who had a problem with that because of the potential secondary effects. Nonetheless, at that time, the President went with the health recommendations, and we extended it another 30 days."

What the hell are you talking about? It's YOUR argument! You said, "it's not a conspiracy theory... since Bright testified this under oath. An oath that hasn't been proven he broke it." Sure it hasn't been proven that he broke it - just like it hasn't been proven that he KEPT it!

 

I am not seeing any sourced AGAIN. And I add: tests were faulty back than.

Nobody under oath disputes this. Nobody challenges him about perjury. You got nothing.

So the point stands... that when Fauci said he wanted social mitigation he got ignored for weeks.
And when Fauci WITH Birx went in... Donald finally caved in.
Got it.

And you accused him he did,... with no prove.

 

You want me to source that contact tracing exists?

Okay, so if someone tested negative when they were in fact positive, they would have been tested again and again if their symptoms persisted!

Disputes WHAT?

OPINIONS cannot result in perjury!

Tapper asks Fauci about, OTHER people other than JUST Fauci who were calling for social distancing. At no point does Fauci say anything about himself INDEPENDENTLY recommending anything.

No I didn't. I simply said that his former employer disputes his claim. I'm saying that he MIGHT have been fired for the EXACT reason that he gave under oath! However, YOU are saying that he DEFINITELY got fired for the EXACT reason that he gave under oath!

 

Still not seeing any sources these people were being tracked and traced.
And I add: the testing at that time was faulty.

If somebody tested negative while in fact it was positive... it could potentially spread all over.

The perjury.

Again. Nobody under oath disputes his opinion. You got nothing, yet you keep on whining around.

He said so in my source that he got ignored for weeks. Sorry.

Not under oath. Means nothing.

 

I didn't claim that they WERE being tracked and traced. After all, why WOULD they be tracked and traced unless there was a reason for it? They would need to have been tested POSITIVE first! All I have said is that if they were tested positive within 14 or so days after returning from China, then it would have been deemed to be possible that they were infected in China or during their return trip. However, NO MEDIA has reported a cluster of cases linked to US citizens returning from China. Your argument is DEAD!

Okay, so if someone tested negative when they were in fact positive, they would have been tested again and again if their symptoms persisted!

Sure, but that person would be tested again and chances are the test would return an accurate positive result.

You don't even know who else was under oath!

It says so in your source that he AND OTHERS got ignored for weeks.

So everything that Barack Obama said, "means NOTHING" because he wasn't under oath?