This is a proof of how Democrats shut down Republicans

Ford was not the salient part of my rebuttal, all of which you failed to refute.

I stand by my post.

 

Nadler in response read the official stipulation that mandates the 48 hours' notice.
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/...ler-over-rules-about-showing-video-at-hearing

You said Dems can't stand the truth yet you're here all the time promoting the Big Lie............among others. Can you say thread fail?

 

Yours is post #77 which means the thread did not fail.
When I call Democrats out for being authoritarian, now you understand why I call them out.

 

Two flat out lies in one sentence.

 

I would appreciate very much any Democrat providing a copy here on the forum of that rule and who sponsored it and the date it passed.

 

Democrats invented some kind of new code.

 

All the video amounted to was parents discussing school issues with the school board. Garland escaped having to express a view on the parents discussion.

 

No Trump is not. As you refuse to hold Biden accountable for acts by his son, it is hypocritical to expect Trump to be blamed even were your claims true as to his son in law.

 

Will you please supply some evidence?

 

Oh hell, it's common knowledge these days, has been for four decades about the time they all crawled out of the closet!!

 

That was part of my reason for leaving the Democrats back in time to elect Reagan.

 

Ya I was a slow learner, I crawled out of the quagmire after Slick Willy

 

Well considering the judge, I'd say you would know better than anyone about failed threads!

 

Here are the general rules for hearings in the Senate, however, there are variances between committees and the rule Nadler might be referring to is one of those rules. However, that being said, the rule applied to videos is treated the same as typed statements by witnesses submitted in advance to the committee

https://www.everycrsreport.com/files/20100318_RL30548_28ce8e891f296875600ec1f5440b4382dd57b2e1.pdf

Hearings in the U.S. Senate: A Guide for Preparation and Procedure

Advance Written Testimony (page 12)

Various committee rules cover how far in advance of the hearing witnesses’ testimony should be
filed, usually between 24 and 72 hours; the rules also cover any requirements for multiple copies.
For example, the Committee on Foreign Relations requires witnesses to file with the committee
48 hours in advance of an appearance at a hearing, whereas the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs
requires 40 copies of testimony to be filed 48 hours in advance.

 

A problem you created. Proving that Nadler lied to the committee.

Nadler is not a Senator.

 

I thought it was laughable that the congressional aid had to literally spoon feed the Nads to shut down both the point of parliamentary order and the 'ruling that wasn't a ruling' because it was just an objection. The Nads wouldn't last a minute on a real bench.

 

You know how this works. It isn't true, but someone tweeted something, a news org printed it, so it has to be true for folks on the left.....

 

Are you really that blind? Say it isn't so.

I suppose you deny that he fornicated with a porn star just after her newly wed wife gave birth, or that he didn't brag about grabbing women's genitals because he was a celeb and could get away with it, or that.....he wasn't the guy who was totally corrupt, who was instrumental in getting Qatar to bail out Jared to the tune of $500,000,000, and no doubt you deny he was the guy who was instrumental in getting China to approve of millions of dollars worth of Trademarks for Ivanka during the time he was negotiating with China, or that the man he appointed to Secretary of Commerce wasn't the same guy who oversaw his real estate deals done through Cypress Bank, etc etc etc, not to mention and that you probably deny that all of the documented reportage on his corruption was made up completely:

https://prospect.org/mapping-corruption-interactive


I've looked for proof Joe Biden acted corruptely, and the evidence does not exist. All I've seen is an email by a couple of Hunter's friends talking ****.

That is NOT evidence. Give me a cancelled check, like this one, made to Cohen for the crime of felony campaign fraud (see the Cohen conviction):

 

She clearly, along with Nadler very alarmed at the parents discussing issues with the school boards and did not want to allow Garland to shoot off his face over the issues either.

 

I am perhaps more fair than you are.
I did not see the porn star engage in sex. Have you seen her engage in sex? Do you understand porn stars sell sex for a living?
You tossed in after birth to be a drama queen.
Rule 1.
When I hire a president, provided he broke no laws, and Trump broke no laws having sex, I judge him on what he does when in office. Same as I do for Biden. Biden is no virgin. I would expect he also paid prostitutes.
Yes on a Private Bus, Trump did brag. But you guys always call him a liar. So how is it this time he told the truth?

When you submit proof to me that Trump was involved in Qatar and paying big money, I will deal with that issue then.

Your morals clearly do not apply to Biden who extorted Ukraine and has loaded his bank account with enormous sums of money from China. Then look at the favor Biden did for Putin of Russia (pipe approval)

Biden stuck his hose into Canada then awarded Putin like old pals.
Trump could not get China to be honest about CV19 so why would I believe what China says about trademarks?

 

I have myself chaired committees and applied Roberts Rules of Orders totally fair to all committee members. Also I like Jordan know the rules very well. Roberts Rules of Orders are used all over America.

 

And yet you guys claim that Trump does not pay his debts.

 

You're a battle as you don't like Republicans because they're Republicans.

I don't need to refute that it's just an opinion

 

A drinking "game" where you get the victim drunk and then rape her two at a time.
Of course his fellow rapists are going to defend him, and themselves.

As is so typical of the Right, when caught in an untruth, they simply defend it with more untruths!
As you well know, Kavanaugh's fellow rapists did NOT testify under oath and therefore can not be charged with perjury. You just made that feces up, now eat it!

 

That is just you spinning things. Typical of those that are not honest.