Do you really want to go there ? Are you so certain that all of your posts are devoid of syntactical and grammatical errors ?
I'm a published writer, but I daresay I make the occasional error in my posts; but that's all they are, 'posts', not dissertations! If they were dissertations I'd take more care with the grammar.
Why not be a bit more expansive and tell me what you think is beyond the universe, instead of making meaningless remarks?
I don't know if we will ever be able to observe beyond our physical universe. Three hundred years ago the notion of an electron scanning microscope would have been unimaginable. Science and technology have been driven by constantly extending our micro and macro observational abilities, yielding all kinds of new knowledge and all kinds of new questions. Apparently you are't familiar with the way science works. There very well be an hypothesis that outside the universe its just "custard", which would have to be supported by some observational or mathematical theory that other scientists would analyse and reject or accept. That's how science works.
You know those flu jabs were developed by 'scientists' just trying to justify their huge grants, right?
Every time you've quoted from that site you get corrected. There are lots of sites out there. How long are you going to stick with a site that so consistently misleads you?
Yes, real scientists whose altruistic efforts are there for all to see and benefit from (tangible, in other words?), not astrophysicists who sit at their desks dreaming up stuff which isn't tangible? I'm backing out of this thread now, not because I'm 'running away' ( ), but because I find it a bit depressing, and secondly because there's obviously going to be no meeting of minds, so I see no point in regurgitating the same arguments over and over again. All I can conclude is that it must be a genetic thing viz. you either believe it or don't believe it.
Do you know, Newton, was never right about gravity, yet still had the calculus he invented never be wrong? Sure, people noticed aberrations in the classical theory but the calculations were always correct. However, he had no friggin' clue about the constancy of the speed of light. By the by, Nikola Tesla was an awesome dude, but it took James Maxwell, a theoretical physicist, unifying electricity and magnetism that helped usher in the modern era of physics.
Actually, it's a total conspiracy propagated by Dem's. It really has no implications in any theory of gravity.
