IMO all theories other than the OCT are basically harmless. While it's true that some outlandish theories are strictly intended to try to discredit those who contradict or do not believe the OCT, the only theory that should be addressed and focused on is the most dangerous one, the OCT. The OCT is a criminally fraudulent pretext to commit war crimes and other human rights atrocities and should be exposed for what it is. I personally do not ascribe to the nuclear, energy weapons, hologram and no plane theories among others but I'm open to any theory that makes sense. It doesn't mean I will knee jerk endorse it but it does mean I will listen to it. For me the most obvious theory is that the WTC towers were destroyed via controlled demolition. How that was accomplished is a matter for thorough investigation, the objective of the grand jury investigation. That the 3 WTC towers were destroyed in that manner is evident via deductive reasoning alone and there is extremely strong circumstantial evidence that supports it as well. 1. There is only one way a steel frame high rise can be fully destroyed and exhibit all (or the vast majority of) the characteristics of a near perfect and successful controlled demolition of a steel frame high rise. And that is a controlled demolition. Failed control demolitions have shown that they cannot fully destroy structures similarly to the WTC towers. 2. No legitimate scientific study has proven that the 3 WTC towers were fully destroyed by planes, damage, fire or a combination. The NIST study of all 3 WTC towers is a proven fraud. 3. No experiment or computer model has ever been developed that can show that any natural cause can duplicate the consequences of a near perfect controlled demolition. 4. There were two office fire experiments of steel framed structures that have proven that fires alone cannot duplicate the consequences of a near perfect controlled demolition or even cause any kind of demolition. 5. There have been at least 40 steel frame high rise infernos in history that have not duplicated the consequences of a near perfect controlled demolition or even caused any kind of demolition. One was hit by rockets on multiple occasions and suffered fires and is in use today (the Usce Tower in Belgrade). Another is the 1975 fire in the North Tower that seriously affected 10 floors. Taking all the above into consideration and given the evidence, the least likely cause of the destruction of the 3 WTC towers on 9/11 is planes, damage, fire or a combination and the most likely cause is controlled demolition, especially given that these 3 occurred on the same day. Note that nothing above is proof of controlled demolition but it is absolute proof that the controlled demolition of the 3 WTC towers on 9/11 must be thoroughly and legitimately scientifically, forensically and criminally investigated as demanded by the current grand jury petition.