To be or not to be... child-free

Discussion in 'Opinion POLLS' started by Canell, Oct 12, 2019.

?

Would you be child-free to save the planet?

  1. I already have children, so no

    18 vote(s)
    37.5%
  2. I have children but I wish I didn't

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. No, this is all liberal nonsense!

    12 vote(s)
    25.0%
  4. Yes, I would rater become child-free

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  5. I have definitely decided to be child-free

    9 vote(s)
    18.8%
  6. I'll do better than that - I'll commit suicide to save the resources of Mother Earth

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  7. Other

    7 vote(s)
    14.6%
  8. Can't make up my mind

    2 vote(s)
    4.2%
  1. BigSteve

    BigSteve Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2019
    Messages:
    725
    Likes Received:
    550
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Gender:
    Male
    If people decide to remain childless to save the planet, that means there are no future generations to inherit the planet, so why bother saving it in the first place?
     
  2. jay runner

    jay runner Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2017
    Messages:
    16,319
    Likes Received:
    10,027
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    So long as it is understood what "with child" means. When a woman is with child she's already got a child.
     
  3. Blaster3

    Blaster3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2018
    Messages:
    6,008
    Likes Received:
    5,302
    Trophy Points:
    113
    who wants to save the planet, i'm doing my part to hasten it's demise...
     
  4. BigSteve

    BigSteve Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2019
    Messages:
    725
    Likes Received:
    550
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Gender:
    Male
    I'm guessing the OP...
     
    Blaster3 likes this.
  5. FoxHastings

    FoxHastings Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2014
    Messages:
    56,891
    Likes Received:
    21,025
    Trophy Points:
    113

    No, the term "with child" does not mean a woman life is anyone's business...

    :) I hope you remember that statement..it still is "none of anyone's business"
     
  6. Texan

    Texan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2014
    Messages:
    9,129
    Likes Received:
    4,703
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    As long as I take care of my kids, it's nobody's business how many kids I have. I don't think very highly of people who have more kids than they can support or people who use abortion as birth control.
     
    unkotare likes this.
  7. unkotare

    unkotare Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2019
    Messages:
    2,368
    Likes Received:
    516
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The other life she is "with" most certainly IS society's business.
     
  8. FoxHastings

    FoxHastings Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2014
    Messages:
    56,891
    Likes Received:
    21,025
    Trophy Points:
    113
    FoxHastings said:
    No, the term "with child" does not mean a woman life is anyone's business...

    :) I hope you remember that statement..it still is "none of anyone's business"


    Nope, it isn't....unless you claim that all pregnant women are property of the government...(they aren't, BTW)
     
  9. FoxHastings

    FoxHastings Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2014
    Messages:
    56,891
    Likes Received:
    21,025
    Trophy Points:
    113
    ******************
     
    Last edited: Nov 7, 2019
  10. FoxHastings

    FoxHastings Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2014
    Messages:
    56,891
    Likes Received:
    21,025
    Trophy Points:
    113
    *********************
     
    Last edited: Nov 7, 2019
  11. FoxHastings

    FoxHastings Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2014
    Messages:
    56,891
    Likes Received:
    21,025
    Trophy Points:
    113

    Hey , want to check out post 106 and see how screwed up YOU made it??? Learn to use the quote function.....

    Altering posts is a no-no-....
     
  12. Ritter

    Ritter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2015
    Messages:
    8,944
    Likes Received:
    3,018
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The reason it screwed up is because you keep screwing up the quotation function by overusing bold and using "FoxHasting wrote [arrow]:...." instead of the quotation function

    I am not going to fix that for you.
     
    Last edited: Nov 7, 2019
  13. FoxHastings

    FoxHastings Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2014
    Messages:
    56,891
    Likes Received:
    21,025
    Trophy Points:
    113


    NO, I did not screw it up...YOU did not use the quote function properly.....maybe if you calmed down you could handle it...:) :)


    Good way to dodge those pesky inconvenient questions ;)
     
  14. FoxHastings

    FoxHastings Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2014
    Messages:
    56,891
    Likes Received:
    21,025
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I have no idea how a child "embodies " Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness...Those words were meant for everyone, ALL citizens...


    So what's your solution?

    FORCE people to marry, breed, and stay married no matter what??


    Is that your version of Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness?


    Please NOTE, those are QUESTIONS
     
    Last edited: Nov 7, 2019
  15. unkotare

    unkotare Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2019
    Messages:
    2,368
    Likes Received:
    516
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

    Of course it is. One person’s autonomy doesn’t grant him or her rights over the life of another.
     
  16. FoxHastings

    FoxHastings Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2014
    Messages:
    56,891
    Likes Received:
    21,025
    Trophy Points:
    113
    FoxHastings said:
    No, the term "with child" does not mean a woman life is anyone's business...

    :) I hope you remember that statement..it still is "none of anyone's business"






    No, it doesn't but there is no "another" if a woman is pregnant.

    There is only one "person", the woman who is pregnant.

    HER right to bodily autonomy gives her the right to do what she wants with her body. No one owns her, no one can use her body to sustain their life.

    Pregnant women do not lose the human right of bodily autonomy because they are pregnant.


    ...and getting back to the topic, NO one is obligated to populate the earth.
     
    Last edited: Nov 7, 2019
  17. unkotare

    unkotare Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2019
    Messages:
    2,368
    Likes Received:
    516
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

    You need to go back to Biology class.
     
  18. Blaster3

    Blaster3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2018
    Messages:
    6,008
    Likes Received:
    5,302
    Trophy Points:
    113
    a debate for the courts... as of now, a fetus is not a person and not subject to the bill of rights... please do try to follow along

    https://constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution/podcast/will-roe-be-overturned

    btw, do you also support forcing a person to live with a cancer growing inside them or force them into having surgery & chemo? , because that's where this leads to, government deciding on medical treatment
     
    FoxHastings likes this.
  19. unkotare

    unkotare Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2019
    Messages:
    2,368
    Likes Received:
    516
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male



    Oh? So you equate a human baby to a tumor? You pro-abortionists always reveal your absolute moral bankruptcy. It’s clear who is “not human.”
     
  20. FoxHastings

    FoxHastings Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2014
    Messages:
    56,891
    Likes Received:
    21,025
    Trophy Points:
    113

    Here, I'll present the whole post:

    ""No, it doesn't but there is no "another" if a woman is pregnant.

    There is only one "person", the woman who is pregnant.

    HER right to bodily autonomy gives her the right to do what she wants with her body. No one owns her, no one can use her body to sustain their life.

    Pregnant women do not lose the human right of bodily autonomy because they are pregnant.


    ...and getting back to the topic, NO one is obligated to populate the earth.""""








    Biology has nothing to do with law and rights.

    A pregnant woman is ONE person.
     
  21. FoxHastings

    FoxHastings Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2014
    Messages:
    56,891
    Likes Received:
    21,025
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Blaster3 said:
    a debate for the courts... as of now, a fetus is not a person and not subject to the bill of rights... please do try to follow along

    https://constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution/podcast/will-roe-be-overturned

    btw, do you also support forcing a person to live with a cancer growing inside them or force them into having surgery & chemo? , because that's where this leads to, government deciding on medical treatment



    That poster did NOT equate a human baby to a tumor...


    ...and despite your attempt at a weak insult NO one said anything about anything being "not human"..

    Maybe reading the posts more slowly would help.
     
  22. unkotare

    unkotare Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2019
    Messages:
    2,368
    Likes Received:
    516
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The pro-abortionist has to pretend to ignore the central moral issue in order to maintain an indefensible position for any decent human being.
     
  23. unkotare

    unkotare Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2019
    Messages:
    2,368
    Likes Received:
    516
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Oh yes it did.
     
  24. Blaster3

    Blaster3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2018
    Messages:
    6,008
    Likes Received:
    5,302
    Trophy Points:
    113
    so far all you've offered is non-sequitur, debate with you is over
     
    FoxHastings likes this.
  25. FoxHastings

    FoxHastings Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2014
    Messages:
    56,891
    Likes Received:
    21,025
    Trophy Points:
    113

    If it did you'd be able to show where....and you didn't....
     

Share This Page