1998. A war broke out between kosovo liberation army (KLA) and serbian forces. NATO convinced us all that the KLA was a rebel group fighting ‘evil’ - A serbian state which was committing genocide. Slobodan milosovic was Hitler incarnated. The governments showed us ‘evidence’, there were the mass graves. Who were we backing? Do research on KLA, they were separatists who cut off heads and murdered people. They were probably as bad or worse than the separatists putin is backing. Slobadan milosovic had to be stopped cause he was a hitler? Sound familiar? Putin sells to his people that ukraine leaders are nazis oppressing Russian separatists so russia has to stop them Back in 1999, Nato started a ruthless bombing campaign, civilians were killed. Thousands of civilians were killed, about 500 attributed to NATO bombings. Where was outrage? Pretty sure in russia they were showing all the civilian deaths and showing how barbaric NATO was, that they were targeting civilians. Over 1 million people displaced what was true and what was false? Were the KLA the good guys? A google search will show pics of KLA members holding decapitated heads. Were the civilians killed back them ok as NATO are the good guys? Wonder if russians saw it this way. Is putin really deliberately targetting civilians? Or is is just collateral damage? Was it ‘good’ collateral dmg when Nato killed 500 civilians during kosovo? Thousands during iraq war? It’s only bad when putin does it, as he does it ‘deliberately’ is that so? here’s a worthwhile clip of a vietnam vet explaining how whilst he was at war and reading or hearing news, what was been reported back in US was the complete opposite of what was actually happening. Last time i checked, we were a free nation back then and had a free press. i have no doubt that putin is acting badly but the media only sees it one way, in the worst possible way, for putin. What is true and what is false?