Toward concensus in the 9/11 community

Discussion in '9/11' started by Jim Fetzer, Mar 24, 2012.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Once again you make the completely RETARDED claim that all the fuel would burn up in the fireball. :lol: Can you show a single plane accident involving a fireball where all the fuel burned up in the fireball leaving no fire behind? Are you honestly trying to pretend that there were no fires started by the plane crash into the towers?
     
  2. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    10,898
    Likes Received:
    3,870
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I thought I'd take a moment now that we're live on the new site to remind Jim of the issues he has yet to address.

    1. The claim that steel turned to dust in large quantities cannot be true.
    - Finely divided steel is pyrophoric. It ignites at room temperature when exposed to oxygen.
    - We did not witness any such combustion during the collapse.

    2. The claim that an aircraft traveling at 500+ miles an hour would have failed to penetrate the outer wall of the tower cannot be true.
    - MIT has shown that the energy of the impact exceeded the shear strength of the area impacted.
    http://web.mit.edu/civenv/wtc/PDFfiles/Chapter IV Aircraft Impact.pdf
    - Jim Fetzer has provided no calculations or study to refute the above.
     
  3. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I wonder when Jimbo will be back to address those questions.

    [​IMG]
    Perhaps he prefers to participate in discussions where the gullible just unquestioningly swallow his bull(*)(*)(*)(*).
     
  4. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    10,898
    Likes Received:
    3,870
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Must be hard work building consensus among people who call you a paid government agent when you fail to meet their expectations.
     
  5. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That's true but, it's the paid shll's failure and the reader's ignorance that are at issue here.
     
  6. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I thought the issue was Jim's (and the Truth movement as a whole) inability to back up their poorly crafted speculations.
     
  7. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Wow! An attack. How incredibly unusual. Page.......7?
     
  8. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That's not an attack. Truthers are unable to back up their poorly crafted speculations.

    Did you contact Jim Fetzer yet?
     
  9. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Someone who routinely calls everyone who disagrees with him shills whining about an absolutely true statement as an attack is just hilarous!
     
  10. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    You think that was an attack? Sensitive Fraud is sensitive.

    I merely wrote the Truth, something you seem to have trouble recognizing.

    Why don't you try more backing up your theories and less bellyaching, and you might not have to play the martyr constantly. That burden must get heavy, why you put it down for a change and give everyone a break?
     
  11. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    10,898
    Likes Received:
    3,870
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What exactly is the issue with "the reader's ignorance?" If the reader is ignorant of something you think they should know, doesn't that speak toward the quality of your education, or are you trying to claim that readers are not intelligent enough to understand you?

    Because if that's the case you really should watch that Ted Talk video I posted. You just might benefit.
     
  12. Alucard

    Alucard New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2015
    Messages:
    7,828
    Likes Received:
    41
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I do believe that the two planes brought down the World Trade Center Buildings.
     

Share This Page