Trump’s “Preventing Online Censorship” Executive Order Is Pro-Censorship Political Theater

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Patricio Da Silva, May 30, 2020.

  1. Patricio Da Silva

    Patricio Da Silva Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2020
    Messages:
    3,899
    Likes Received:
    2,534
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    No, Trump is not a dictator, he just plays one on TV.

    Do you Trump supporters understand how lame this EO is?

    It has no legal force, yet Trump thinks it does, which proves he is dumb.

    Not only that, if you read this law blog, it really explains how moronic
    the EO actually is, in fact, it's mindboggling in it's lameness

    Why? If some first year law student wrote it, okay, but it's coming from
    the President Of The United States, who, in turn, appointed incompetent lawyers and/or staff to draft the thing and Trump is way way too daft
    to see it for it's epic bloviating-ness.

    And scroll down to the section labeled:

     
    Last edited: May 30, 2020
    Golem and FoxHastings like this.
  2. Antiduopolist

    Antiduopolist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2016
    Messages:
    24,354
    Likes Received:
    10,856
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Bashing Trump?

    Lame.

    But of course he overreacted to the alleged "fact-checking."

    However, now that Twitter's censored him?

    They're done.
     
  3. Patricio Da Silva

    Patricio Da Silva Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2020
    Messages:
    3,899
    Likes Received:
    2,534
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Incompetent rebuttal.
     
    Golem and FoxHastings like this.
  4. garyd

    garyd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Messages:
    41,329
    Likes Received:
    9,638
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The above is of course Orwellian nonsense.
     
    Last edited: May 30, 2020
  5. Patricio Da Silva

    Patricio Da Silva Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2020
    Messages:
    3,899
    Likes Received:
    2,534
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The above is, of course, Orwellian nonsense.

    At least I got the commas right.
     
  6. Golem

    Golem Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2016
    Messages:
    22,664
    Likes Received:
    8,207
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I am still looking for those who used to claim they were "Constitutionalists" and "originalists" reacting to this.

    I would imagine two groups. Those who do honestly defend the constitution and are ready to dump Trump for his continuous attacks on the Constitution. And CINOS (Constitutionalists In Name Only) who constantly change their narrative as it pleases "The Idol". I don't see a third alternative, and it has failed to show up in any of the threads about this matter.
     
    Patricio Da Silva likes this.
  7. garyd

    garyd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Messages:
    41,329
    Likes Received:
    9,638
    Trophy Points:
    113
    But that was all.
     
  8. TheGreatSatan

    TheGreatSatan Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2009
    Messages:
    20,646
    Likes Received:
    20,239
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why? Seemed fine to me.

    He even says trump overreacted.

    Twitter taking sides is like having a public park only white people can use. If they are going to have "fact checking", they need to do it across the board or none at all.
     

Share This Page