Trump and mass hysteria

Wrong, as always!

The election results have been proven to have been tampered with which renders them invalid. Just like in NC there should be a do-over when the EVIDENCE of tampering exists.

 

Yup!

The bar was lowered with VP Quayle and then lowered even further with Bush jr. Right now the bar has been thrown in the trash so as to allow the sewer scum we currently have stinking up the Oval office.

 

All of that is on plain display every day,.

No one needs to be a mind reader to know about Trump’s sad legacy of failed deals.

No one needs to be a mind reader to know that he pissed away the fortune his daddy left him.

No one needs to see how the narcisstic little man child gets off on having people grovel before him and how he loves being in front of his cheering crowds.

No one needs to be a mind reader to see how clearly intimidated he when he is around people who he knows are smarter than he is or know how to use political power. All you have to do is watch him kiss the backsides of other world leaders.

No one needs to be a mind reader to know that Trump is a pathological liar,

No one needs to be a mind reader to see that Trump is a vulgar ignorant creep with a giant chip on his shoulder.

But perhaps you can tell us about his nobility, intelligence, grace under pressure, and class.

 

You're pretty much right on all counts. But for people with a conservative agenda all these are forgivable if he pursues their wishes and still preferable to Hilary.

 

I think you’re right and wrong.

Trump has no political ideology. But he knows how to speak Archie Bunker, and he has seen how successful folks like Rush Limbaugh have become by doing just that.

He knows how to repeat the simple notions of plain people back to them, and they love him for it.

He doesn’t have to deliver because his base thinks this is just one big running melodrama and they tune in every day to see the next chapter, like a soap opera.

Many of them take it for granted that government is run by the powerful behind the scenes and assume that nothing changes for them. They take that for granted.

 

But he isn't in a courtroom, and he isn't indicted. Wishing it so don't make it so, does it?

 

I can't seem to find a post of yours that doesn't slander, in rather crass terms, your president. Are you going to wail and gnash your teeth forever, or grow up and learn to live with reality?

 

It's really not about getting over Clinton, as much as it's about not getting their way. The left believes they are the elites, in particular the rich donor class like the Hollywood, and Wall Street types...they don't understand or like our Republic which allows the people to determine who's going to be in Washington

 

The comedian Louis CK had a perspicacious observation along these lines:

"Democracy does not mean getting everything you want."

 

I don't give two craps about Obama and Hillary.

Trump kicked over Obama's "pen and phone" legacy like it was a wobbly card table, and he broke Hillary's spine in 2016 and left her lying by the side of the road like a squashed possum.

I agree with you, neither of them are at all relevant.

 

On display for a mind-reader perhaps.

Yes, one does need that ability in order to know what goes on in someone else's mind. It looks like you admit that you don't have that mystical power.

Therefore, you're making it all up.

Therefore, it's fantasy.

I can't argue against an imaginary world.

 

You've got a way with words.

 

That you DENY that it should be so says volumes!

 

Ironic that you took my 1st Amendment right and turned it into a PUERILE PF Rule VIOLATION of your own.

 

If Trump had lost in 2

In the first place, the First Amendment protects you from the government, which isn't even interested in stopping your ravings about Your President.

It does not protect you from my criticism, puerile or otherwise. Toughen up.

 

Cite to something more serious and substantive than your personal objections to his character, and then I'll speak you some volumes. Calling your president a doody head over and over while foaming at the mouth isn't serious.

I'm starting a new thread on obstruction of justice, and you can go to town on it. Ah, a nice big fat softball over the plate ... if you can hit it.

 

You are correct.

Your BLOTUS is a fugitive from the law hiding from the law behind the Office of the Executive.

 

That you are IGNORING the legal documents defining the crimes of your BLOTUS says volumes.

 

Careful, 'simple notions of plain people'? A step away from 'deplorables' and 'flyover America'.

 

I am trying to think of the last time a conservative started bragging on national television about having nightmares about an election and screaming about it .

https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/n...nna-margulies-turns-nyt-npr-protect-her-trump

I am telling you, there is something wrong with these people. I suppose some of them (you?), just act like they hate Trump because it's good business. But mostly, they're nuts.

 

Volumes, eh?

Are you still claiming Russian "collusion"? Did that even happen? Even if it did, what law does that violate?

If you are arguing obstruction of justice, you need to read my new thread explaining the elements.

Obstruction isn't usually black and white. Killing a juror is one thing, sure. But all these incidents Mueller describes are in the grey zone. You have to prove corrupt intent. It's not enough to prove that Trump wanted Flynn to get off or even that he lobbied for it.

You can't accomplish that on an Internet forum. You have to sit on a jury, look at the evidence, and fairly consider the arguments of both sides. You are on such a full boil all the time, and are so virulently anti-Trump, that your opinion is worthless. It's worse than worthless. What do you think would happen if you were called for jury duty in the case of United States versus Donald Trump and the judge and the lawyers got a hold of your remarks made on this forum? "Mr. Derideo Te, can you set aside your prejudice and personal feelings and follow the law as I give it to you, giving the defendant Donald Trump the presumption of innocence and being fair to both sides?"

If you said yes, you'd be laughed out of town.

 

LOL at "fugitive." Another legal term you need to look up in the dictionary. Not even Maxine Waters has got it this bad.

 

Your childish PF Rule VIOLATIONS are your problem, not mine!

 

EIGHT HUNDRED former DOJ prosecutors all agree that the DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE in the Mueller report amounts to OOJ!

Your opinion is irrelevant since they have qualifications to know what it actually means to obstruct justice.

Even your BLOTUS knows that he is guilty which is why he is obstructing justice.

 

Prosecutors only give one side of the story. Not the other. Don't you know this? (Besides, there are thousands of prosecutors who did not sign that stupid letter.)

Prosecutors are no more qualified to sit in legal judgment of Trump than you are, and you are hopelessly prejudiced.

Of course you are qualified to mouth off on the internet, but it's just noise.