Trump claims that he's "too intelligent" to believe in climate change.

Don't worry,. Planned Deathhood and Democrats plan to abort them.

 

Physical geography put humans in charge of climate? You are the first to ever make that claim.

 

Though you keep saying it, strangely you make no attempt to prove it. Is it that hard for you to do?

 

So you claim our water and air is more polluted? Perhaps you checked out the Democrats cities. But check the republican cities.

 

Only a dimwot makes a statement like that. Let's face it. Trump is not the smartest rock in the pile.

 

BINGO!!

 

Change in all aspects of life is constant and unavoidable. We naturally adapt.

 

The North American continent was surely at its 'cleanest' before mankind put its first footprint anywhere over here. Can we at least agree on that?

But, you may not remember the 1960's and 1970's, when we had terrible pollution of damned near everything, including rivers, lakes, streams, and the AIR! We are in much, much better shape regarding our environment now than we were back than.

Is it perfect? Will it ever go back to being an "Eden"...? No, not as long as humans occupy this world.

But, this incessant rant that liberals are always raving about the horrific threat of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) is hysterical bullshit!

Truth? The Carbon Dioxide content of the Earth's atmosphere is -- 0.04% . For those of you who didn't do too well with public school arithmetic, that's "zero point zero four percent". Sometimes a picture helps....



Want to do something that really helps the planet in the 21st-century? CLEAN UP ALL THE SQUARE MILES OF SH!T THAT'S OUT THERE FLOATING IN THE OCEANS!

 

Seriously, “pie” charts are round, not elliptical. Secondly, liberals don’t rave about anything. They just wonder why deniers who know nothing about science doubt every university in the world, all the signees to the AGW consensus, NASA and our own military and intel. Really, there are no relevant institutions that agree with you. None, nada, nix, zero........name one major science institute, corporation or university that agrees with you....l.just one, uno......ANY.

 

Which does not matter because the greenhouse effect is something that occurs on the surface of the planet...not ten miles above it.

 

It’s strange that deniers of AGW would think that co2 levels have to be exptermely high to cause problems when only changes of a couple degrees can alter the weather patterns dramatically.
People who have problems with AGW, also seem to have problems with natural selection and evolution. One answers many questions for the other. But it never stops. They keep repeating the same falicies over and over thinking it’s reasonable when there are thousands of web sites literally, everywhere that provide intelligent answers for free. Yes, the truth is free......

 

What? You never ate an oval pie? What a bunch of nit-picking nonsense.

Oh... and "Liberals don't rave about anything"...?

."GAAH! In a 100 years the ocean will rise 6 centimeters! RAISE TAXES NOW!"

 

Did you ever take a stat course ? Pie charts ARE ROUND.
Making them elliptical is an illusionary way of over emphasizing a false narrative. Unless compensated for with a smaller center angle subtending the area representing designated stat, it is CHEATING.

Ross Perot was doing well until on national television, he pulled this s.h.i.t. He got called out on it along with other exaggerations. The rest is history.

 

I see you didn't answer a single question, instead you play grammar Nazi. I guess you folks got nothing...

 

Oh please, just watch and learn. In winter and spring its climate change, in summer its global warming, this is all about the image the hucksters are trying to project. What you are saying above is not the message we get from the rest of you fraudsters...

 

That's not true at all, just another liberal generalization...

 

Localized environmental damage isn't global in scale, totally different things...

 

Probably just the opening salvo of hell finally freezing over...

 

Really so the TX sixed plastic dump in the pacific is localized. Entire rivers polluted, here is another issue, most of your fish is farmed because the oceans have been depleted. How about entire cities with so much air pollution, everyone is told to stay indoors, cities with millions of people!!!!

 

Yeah, localized to a Texas sized piece of the Pacific Ocean, meaning an area that is less than 0.005% of the Pacific. Sounds pretty localized to me. You folks seriously do not understand the concept of scope or scale do you? What you are talking about is all localized items. One river wherever it is, is not global, same with a city and the air that is polluted there. I'm beginning to think you folks are really clueless about everything you whine about...

 

How many more times are going to false and misleading statements!!!!
Get a globe!!!

Pacific ocean = 63,800,000 => https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacific_Ocean
Texax = 268,597 => https://state.1keydata.com/states-by-size.php

Take a look at these pictures around the globe!!!!!
http://plastic-pollution.org/

 

Wow, scope and scale do escape you. No need for a globe, just let us know the percentage, same as how you folks don't understand how big the atmosphere is and how little humans can or do contribute to anything. Its laughable how ignorant you people are...

 

Yeah, he says he's a "stable genius". What I know is that he is not a normal president. He's not even an ABNORMAL president! But he is a normal despot. This is how they behave.

 

i suggest you do some long division.

 

i would add those that believe him too !!!