Trump insinuates using rifles to fire on Liz Cheney

"Let's put her [Cheney] with a rifle standing there with 9 barrels shooting at her. Let's see how she feels about it. You know, when the guns are trained on her face." --DJT

https://x.com/atrupar/status/1852209432878342308

Can you imagine if Biden had said that?

I mean, Repub pundits would be having a field day, heads exploding like a bucket of lit fireworks

This is but one thing, in a litany of things, stuff that Trump has done and said, that clearly reveal he is unfit for the presidency. And what will repubs do? Yawn. Amazing.

He also insinuated that 'in times gone by, 'Milley' would have been put to death

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/09/trump-milley-execution-incitement-violence/675435/

 

Fake News.

He called on her to go fight in the wars she is so willing to send her fellow Americans to face the rifle barrels of the enemy.

Small wonder that so few trust the lying fake news media

 

He's right.

Let's have some of these Chicken Hawks, like the Cheney's actually go fight the wars they demand other Americans fight.



Trump vs the Military Industrial Complex.

 

This reminds me of an excellent anti-war song.

You depend on our protection
Yet you feed us lies from the tablecloth​

And:

Why don’t presidents fight the war?
Why do they always send the poor?
​

Trump's Right On Cheney's and War

 

Did you jump to this conclusion without having the full context?

"She’s a radical war hawk. Let's put her with a rifle standing there with 9 barrels shooting at her, OK? Let's see how she feels about it. You know, when the guns are trained on her face. They're all war hawks when they're sitting in Washington in a nice building saying, ‘Oh gee, well let's send 10,000 troops into the mouths of the enemies,’ but she’s a stupid person and I used to have meetings with a lot of people and she always wanted to go to war with people,"

Or were you hoping the folks reading your OP would accept your conclusion without reading the full context?

Clearly he's making the same ol' 'warmongers love wars as long as they don't have to fight in them' argument that anti-war people have been making forever.

 

exactly @modernpaladin
"Did you jump to this conclusion without having the full context?"

The OP should be banned for putting this disinformation and propaganda on this site...

The full context makes this garbage thread a...... garbage thread........ ff to 43:30
""She's a radical war hawk. Let's put her with a rifle standing there with 9 Barrel shooting at her. Okay, let's see how she feels about it. You know, when the guns are trained on her face you know, they're all war hawks when they're sitting in Washington in a nice building saying, oh, gee will let's say send a let's send 10,000 troops right into the mouth of the enemy. but she's a stupid person, and I used to have I I have meetings. with a lot of people. and she always wanted to go to war with people. So whether
it's her, whether it's Dick""

 

So I guess the conclusion here is that it would be ok to "put her with a rifle standing there, with nine barrels shooting at her, okay? Let's see how she feels about it, you know, when the guns are trained on her face,"

 

I don't think we need to be banning things... its enough to recognize that either the OP was fooled by deceptive media (and we can hope maybe a lesson was learned regarding who is and isn't trustworthy), or the OP was happy to go along with the ruse... and a different lesson can be learned regrading who is and isn't trustworthy.

 

Another day in the office for Trump.


"Hillary wants to abolish, essentially abolish the Second Amendment. By the way, and if she gets to pick — if she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I don’t know.” - Trump, 2016

 

No, the conclusion was already provided by Trump. Its just that the context was removed to try and make it look like something else. This is the intended conclusion, and I quote:

"They're all war hawks when they're sitting in Washington in a nice building saying, ‘Oh gee, well let's send 10,000 troops into the mouths of the enemies"

 

The context is that it was said by psycho who knows his followers take calls to violence literally, and dismiss anything that is not violence as just "political speech". How many January 6s and similar episodes do we need to go through to show you that they understand very clearly the "veiled" instructions that Trump is sending their way?

The worst of this is that sometimes Trump HIMSELF does it automatically without realizing that he's doing it.

 

Nah... it is the OP's modus operandi... the OP wasn't fooled, he was try to fool.... ain't the first time, ain't the last.

 

"They're all war hawks when they're sitting in Washington in a nice building saying, ‘Oh gee, well let's send 10,000 troops into the mouths of the enemies"

 

And your point being?

 

????

Are you ok?

 

Clearly you missed the context. I provided it for you.

 

Why do you feel the need to omit the entire context of what he said? Because you know if you included everything he said what he meant would be very clear.

But don't worry because it is very clear to people that pay attention to the entirety of what someone has said

 

Are you also finding it difficult to include the entire context?

 

And yet it's Trump who is the one who's getting shot at. Go figure.

 

I GAVE you the context. You think MAGAs pay any attention to anything other than the violent parts when Trump makes these calls? January 6, for example, proves that they DON'T!

And you could argue that Trump is a worn out old man with the intellectual capacity of a moron and doesn't know what he's saying. But then we ALL need to be making that point instead of making up excuses like you try to do here. Because people CAN get hurt.

 

I love the hysterical desperation. He didn't say that

He didn't insinuate it

You all are having a meltdown after Biden and Cuban stepped in it

 

And you think that justifies him calling for his supporters to shoot at somebody else.

 

It is threads like this that make me doubt most of what the democrats say.

 

Such a thing never happened except for in the fertile confines of your productive imagination

 

And you support Old Bone Spurs.