Trump Jr.'s 2017 Testimony Conflicts With Cohen's Account Of Russian Talks

...and Hillary lied to Congress over and over again claiming she could recall anything about Benghazi or her emails. The Trumps should go to jail right after both Clinton’s. Deal?

 

When all 100% industry mistakes go in one direction only, against Trump and are splashed all over the MSM while apologies and retractions are hidden on page 19 or in small print, I choose to call such industry Fake News and a propaganda arm of the Liberal/Swamp elites.

 

Its not confusing if you actually read it and did not rely on some loon on twitter.

Your loyal to wishful thinking and will believe anything if it suits your agenda which in this case is to get rid of Trump by any means.

 

Cohen could be lying now

 

I understand mueller is on a fishing expedition and can keep anything he catches

So you dont have to keep reminding me

but its still bait and swirch since the public was fooled into thinking irs about trump collusion with russia

 

Why the obsessed on the left can't recognize the cliff they are being led off remains a mystery to me.

When the 4th Estate becomes an almost exclusive club of ideologues, people need to be very concerned to know what can happen.

History has recorded enough examples of the outcomes from that kind of collusion to know what it can lead to.

 

The media you consume doesn't have 19 pages.

And it never retracts or corrects anything.

 

Donald Trump Jr's 2017 Senate Judiciary Committee testimony:

Q. "It’s been reported that in late 2015 or 2016 when now President Trump was running for office the Trump Organization was pursuing a plan to develop a massive Trump Tower in Moscow. Is that accurate?"

A. "Yes."

http://thefederalist.com/2018/11/30...bout-donald-trump-jr-s-2017-senate-testimony/

NPR lied and has had to retract the story that Trump Jr. lied to the Senate Judiciary Committee, because he didn't.

NPR softens their lie with the term "mischaracterization" but they are liars.

NPR is fake news.

 

Yah maybe he admitted to a crime that didn’t happen lol

 

With all these "major bombshells" blowing up in their faces you think they would learn. Remember this oldy but goody from the Cuck News Network?

CNN Botches Major ‘Bombshell’ Alleging Contacts Between Don Jr. And WikiLeaks

Perhaps the most jarring error in the CNN report is the date on which members of the Trump Organization, including Donald Trump and Trump Jr., were sent the email. The network reported that a person named Mike Erickson sent the email on Sept. 4, 2016, with a link to Wikileaks documents as well as a decryption key to access them.

The email also offered access to emails that had been stolen from former Sec. of State Colin Powell, according to CNN.

But a copy of the email provided to The Daily Caller shows that Erickson sent the email on Sept. 14.

That date is significant because WikiLeaks provided a link to a batch of stolen documents on Sept. 13. The group touted the release of the documents, which were stolen from the DNC and published by Guccifer 2.0.


The email shows that Erickson messaged Trump Jr. stating that “Wikileaks has uploaded another (huge 678 mb) archive of files from the DNC.”

“It is too big for me to send you by e-mail attachments, but you can download it yourselves,” he added, providing a link to the same website cited by Wikileaks the day before.

He also included a link to a decryption key that could be used to access the documents.

Powell’s emails were also published online on Sept. 13. DC Leaks, a group that has been affiliated with the Russian government, published the documents online. The group granted access to the documents to several news organizations, including The Daily Caller. (RELATED: EXCLUSIVE: Colin Powell’s Emails Hacked, Published Online)
https://dailycaller.com/2017/12/08/...leging-contacts-between-don-jr-and-wikileaks/

 

Maybe I'm slow today, but what is the issue here?

 

NPR cant read.

 

And yet, despite that entire thing being completely unauthenticated, a extraordinary search warrant was granted with it and it launched an investigation. Do you know HOW much resources have been wasted? Probably the whole of June 2016-to-let's say summer of 2017 of resources, WASTED.

Britain interfered, not only with the 2016 elections but it interfered in the course of this investigation through the improper testimonies. If we sanction Russia for its election interference, we should also sanction the UK for the same.

 

...

 

I haven't had my second cup of coffee yet so I can relate on the slow part. It is a pattern. NPR and CNN seem to be of the same ethos by publishing "bombshells" that turn out to be dishonest duds. Gonna go get my second cup now.

 

He's so fearsome that his hooker client now has been ordered by the Court to pay hundreds of thousand of dollars to her politician client.

 

Not only that but his client and he are fighting over money now... said client is also saying said lawyer said things she did not say.

 

This story reinforces what liberals desperately want to believe even though it's not true. You guys should see what my liberal friends on Facebook are saying right now - they believe this story and they still believe the Russian pee tape exists and Trump colluded with them. Even though they're somewhat nice people, their hate for one man allows them to believe anything negative about him. They still think Trump is a racist, homophobe, misogynistic Islamophobe, yet they can never cite any stories regarding those claims. At least the liberals on this board follow the stories, twist them a bit and hope Trump is guilty of something, but they know in their heart of hearts it's all just a sham, or at least I hope they know it's all just a sham because we keep pointing it out to them.

 

Actually, when Journalists used to have integrity they'd double checked before pressing the submit button(in those days, printing the paper.) Now that they can 'retract' 'if'(when) they're wrong, they can propagandize.

That's the reality of the ongoing investigation, more than half of it has been a media propaganda blitz.

 

No, the public knew that Mueller had a much broader directive.

Syncophants convinced themselves that anything absent a criminal conviction against trump for collusion with Russia to steal the election amounted to the only goal of Mueller.

 

And that's collusion?

Heh, OK

 

"Mistakes get made and real journalists own up to their mistakes..."

Nope. I don't recall any mistakes like this during 8 years of the Obama Presidency. Were there any stories put out that were negative to President Obama that were later found false and later retracted?

It seems these "mistakes" only run one way.

 

Mis-answering written question from a prosecutor is not perjury.
Glad to see you so elated at all this Soviet style prosecutions. I bet you would have been a real gas at the witch burnings of yore.

 

I think we're long past any prosecution of Hillary for conspiring and colluding with foreign agents to affect the election.

 

.... and why is the moon made of green cheese?