Trump ordered the FBI to not interview 25 witnesses who may have had evidence against Kavanaugh

Ridiculous. As we know, even pointing out the moral bankruptcy of Trump himself has no effect on The Following's fawning adoration of the Adulterer-in-Chief. As for Schlitz, if his past behavior wasn't convincing enough of his lack of fitness to be a SC justice his petulant, sniveling performance during the hearing certainly should have been. Instead, it gave us more evidence of the GOP's willingness to assign anyone to any position, regardless of a lack of the necessary qualities to hold that position, in order to consolidate power.

 

What was wrong with his performance during the hearing? Do you think someone being falsely accused and slandered in such public manner should simply adopt stoicism with a stiff upper lip? That's ridiculous.

As long as you call Brett Cavanaugh "Schlitz" any argument you make is complete and utter idiocy and intellectually bankrupt.

 

Thanks for giving your opinion. Sadly, it has no bearing on Schlitz's admitted, past abuse of alcohol.......except to pretend ignoring it will make it go away.

Have you seen the video of his performance? As a matter of fact, if the accusations were false stoically denying them is exactly the kind of behavior I'd expect from an innocent man. Instead, he humiliated himself.

 

I watched his testimony live and it was hardly "humiliating". Honestly don't know how you can characterize it as that. Aside from your mindless hatred of anything related to President Trump of course.

 

Your libeling of Justice Cavanaugh is all your opinion as well.

 

Pointing out behavior Schlitz has admitted to isn't libel.

 

I calls 'um as I sees 'um. His performance was an embarrassment to himself and everyone associated with him.

 

Wow...a guy drank beer, sometimes too much, in college.

Meanwhile Jerry Nadler supports murders and terrorist and you back his Chairmanship.

Ladies and gentlemen, this is the difference between the parties

 

ONLY "RIDICULOUS" TO THE PEOPLE PEDDLING CRAP, TRYING TO PASS OFF HATE AS JUSTICE AND INNUENDO AS FACT- FOR TOTALLY SELF-SERVING AND ILLICIT PURPOSES.

THEY ARE THE MORAL BANKRUPTS- NOT ONLY SHORT ON THE QUALITIES OF REAL MEN AND WOMEN, BUT CHOOSING TO ABANDON WHAT VALUES THEY MAY HAVE HAD BEFORE.
UNFIT TO HOLD OPINIONS, LET ALONE HOLD OFFICE.
.
THESE PEOPLE WHO UNDERMINE THE BASIC VALUES OF THE NATION FOR PETTY PERSONAL VENGEANCE- AND THEY PROVE THEMSELVES TO BE BURDENED WITH FAULTS FAR BEYOND ANYTHING TRUMP MAY HAVE.

I THINK YOU WORSHIP THEM.

 

You do know that getting drunk from time to time does not make one an alcoholic. And I speak as a non drinker who has nothing but revulsion for alcohol.

 

Yes, I know.

 

I can see pointing out the Groper-in-Chief's moral depravity has upset you. What you should be upset about is his moral depravity.

 

The moral depravity remains with the party that continues to falsely accuse people like the Justice.

And

Supports then chairmanship of jerry, a man that openly supports known terrorist and murderers

 

Her Lack of memory of the even may or may not be confirmed likely not. And I'd just about bet you at this late date the dems can find twenty people to lie about almost anything. After all the rule of thumb is to keep conservatives from having a majority on the court no matter what. And yes I have reached the point where leftist credibility on such issues is well less that zero.

 

You know better than that- it is the moral depravity of people who put their own bitterness and failure in life ahead of not only the president, but the entire nation. Small, small people whose self-indulgence dominates their every waking moment.

 

They were ALL being investigated. if the investigation found that they had lied (which it didn't), the women would have been charged with perjury, and contempt of congress,and the same goes for hiim. He also could have been charged with rape, since there is no statute of limitations in Connecticut for felony sexual assaultt, which is what he's being accused of, and the alleged assaults took place at Yale, meaning that the Connecticut DA has the right to file charges at any time.

He also might have faced federal charges since there is no statute of limitations if felony sexual crimes have been committed. If evidence were discovered that could lead to his conviction, he could be charged with any sexual-based felonies he committed regardless of how much time had past.

 

The investigation was NOT part of the typical vetting process. It was ordered specifically after the accusations were made. It wouldn't have taken place if the accusations had NOT been made. Therefore, it was a stand-alone investigations.

And contrary to claims that he couldn't be charged because of a statute of iimitations. He can be. There is no statute of limitations on sexual felonies. If he assaulted any of the women, and it were proven, he could still be charged, both at the federal level and in Connecticut where the assaults took place.

 

There isn't one..... There is no legal limitation for filing charges for felony sexual crimes, which is what he is accused of. if the FBI found evidence that proved his guilt, he would be charged with either felony assault or rape.

 

It was ABSOLUTELY part of the vetting process. That is why Blasey Ford kept asking for the FBI so that her story could be part of their vetting process which was skipped in the normal course of their vetting because she didnt come forward until very late in the process. To whatever extent that it was not typical is the extent that Democrats behavior and obstinance was not typical.

To call this a criminal investigation is truly nonsensical and bereft of reality. I always thought you were above that type of bombastic tactic. TDS seems to have taken hold of virtually every dissenter.

 

The confusion reigns in the far right if they think Kavanaugh cannot be held to account by Roberts or the DOJ or local law enforcement.

 

So long as the left believes that those they dislike can be held accountable for the crime of not agreeing with them, the cries for justice will continue...

 

You took your shot, you missed.

And now you get a conservative judge on the SC for a long time to come who won't forget the despicable attempts at character assassination the liberals perpetrated against him.

Payback is a bitch.

 

How would you describe a person who, while married, has a sexual affair with a porn star............and later pays hush money to her to keep the voting public from learning of the sordid business?

 

Schlitz assassinated his own character when he sexually molested a girl and then acted like the victim when called out for doing so.

 

If that's what you need to tell yourself in order to hold back the sobs, then so be it.