Dismiss Notice
Thanks for being a member of our community. Please donate toward site expenses if you can.

TRUMP SCIENCE ADVISOR DENIES APOLLO MOON LANDINGS EVER HAPPENED

Discussion in 'Conspiracy Theories' started by Destroyer of illusions, Aug 14, 2017.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

Page 4 of 27
  1. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,300
    Likes Received:
    849
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This topic is about whether the Apollo program was a big hoax so there's nothing more on-topic than the arguments put forward by the hoax-believers.
     
    Scott, Aug 16, 2017
    #76
  2. Surfer Joe

    Surfer Joe Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2008
    Messages:
    24,400
    Likes Received:
    15,543
    Trophy Points:
    113
    LMAO...Sorry, but I'm not interested in checking out your brain farts on this topic.
     
    Surfer Joe, Aug 16, 2017
    #77
    Bowerbird likes this.
  3. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,300
    Likes Received:
    849
    Trophy Points:
    113
    None of you pro-Apollo posters can post anything with substance in it; it's all just empty name-calling and invective.

    This Apollo-believer is supposed to be the best authority on Apollo.
    http://www.clavius.org/about.html

    He's obviously a paid sophist who knows the missions were faked as well as the hoax-believers do. Look what he says here.

    http://www.apollohoax.net/forum/index.php?topic=1118.15
    (reply #26)

    Any seventh-grader could tell you that this isn't true. Read the thread to see the background.
     
    Scott, Aug 16, 2017
    #78
  4. SillyAmerican

    SillyAmerican Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2016
    Messages:
    3,678
    Likes Received:
    1,285
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    What do I think? I think people should start reading the FAQs and disclaimers of the sites they reference. Here, for example, is the disclaimer from The World News Daily Report (with added italicizing/emboldening being mine):

    Disclaimer

    The nature of Internet communications means that your communications may be susceptible to data corruption, unauthorized access, interception and delays. This website may include incomplete information, inaccuracies or typographical errors. World News Daily Report, and any other persons involved in the management of this website, may make changes in the information and content included in this website at any time without notice.

    WNDR shall not be responsible for any incorrect or inaccurate information, whether caused by website users or by any of the equipment or programming associated with or utilized in this website or by any technical or human error which may occur.

    WNDR assumes however all responsibility for the satirical nature of its articles and for the fictional nature of their content. All characters appearing in the articles in this website – even those based on real people – are entirely fictional and any resemblance between them and any persons, living, dead, or undead is purely a miracle.​

    Don't worry, it happens to the best of us... :)
     
    Last edited: Aug 16, 2017
    SillyAmerican, Aug 16, 2017
    #79
  5. Hotdogr

    Hotdogr Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2013
    Messages:
    11,052
    Likes Received:
    5,276
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, this topic is about Trump's science advisor.
     
    Hotdogr, Aug 16, 2017
    #80
  6. Durandal

    Durandal Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    May 25, 2012
    Messages:
    55,663
    Likes Received:
    27,199
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You reject evidence (overwhelming, really) and arguments contrary to your position. People like you are pathologically myopic and biased.
     
    Durandal, Aug 16, 2017
    #81
    Bowerbird likes this.
  7. Durandal

    Durandal Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    May 25, 2012
    Messages:
    55,663
    Likes Received:
    27,199
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Trump's science advisor is evidently an even bigger joke than the man who appointed him. What is it with Trump appointing total nimrods like this guy and Scaramucci?
     
    Durandal, Aug 16, 2017
    #82
    Bowerbird likes this.
  8. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,300
    Likes Received:
    849
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Scott, Aug 16, 2017
    #83
  9. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,300
    Likes Received:
    849
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Go into some detail so we have something to talk about. Address post number fifty nine.

    I have to go now. I'll be back tomorrow.
     
    Last edited: Aug 16, 2017
    Scott, Aug 16, 2017
    #84
  10. Durandal

    Durandal Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    May 25, 2012
    Messages:
    55,663
    Likes Received:
    27,199
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You run along. I'm done addressing your posts. I've already done so repeatedly in the kook section.
     
    Durandal, Aug 16, 2017
    #85
    Bowerbird likes this.
  11. SillyAmerican

    SillyAmerican Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2016
    Messages:
    3,678
    Likes Received:
    1,285
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Hey, believe what you want. Just don't provide a link to a satirical website as justification for your beliefs, as that simply won't fly.
     
    SillyAmerican, Aug 16, 2017
    #86
  12. Lesh

    Lesh Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2015
    Messages:
    42,206
    Likes Received:
    14,119
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There's "smart" and there's "nuts"
     
    Lesh, Aug 16, 2017
    #87
    rcfoolinca288 and Bowerbird like this.
  13. Hotdogr

    Hotdogr Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2013
    Messages:
    11,052
    Likes Received:
    5,276
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This guy was not appointed to any office by any administration. And he has not ever expressed any doubt about the moon landing. The story is fake.
     
    Last edited: Aug 16, 2017
    Hotdogr, Aug 16, 2017
    #88
  14. JakeJ

    JakeJ Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 5, 2015
    Messages:
    27,360
    Likes Received:
    8,062
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Interesting how what I highlighted was just blown off.
     
    JakeJ, Aug 16, 2017
    #89
  15. Hotdogr

    Hotdogr Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2013
    Messages:
    11,052
    Likes Received:
    5,276
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Hotdogr, Aug 16, 2017
    #90
  16. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    92,590
    Likes Received:
    74,054
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    It was tracked both telescopically and via Ham Radio

    Just google it there is a lot of info out there

    SOMETHING went to the moon
     
    Bowerbird, Aug 16, 2017
    #91
  17. Durandal

    Durandal Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    May 25, 2012
    Messages:
    55,663
    Likes Received:
    27,199
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Good! Not surprising, actually.
     
    Durandal, Aug 16, 2017
    #92
  18. Durandal

    Durandal Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    May 25, 2012
    Messages:
    55,663
    Likes Received:
    27,199
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Oh, those kooks can get creative when you try to corner them. They'll tell you that an unmanned vehicle went and relayed radio signals (nevermind the doubled delay that would cause in signal transmission), or some such nonsense. Most often they'll try to change the subject, though.
     
    Durandal, Aug 16, 2017
    #93
  19. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,300
    Likes Received:
    849
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This doesn't make the mountain of hoax proof go away. There are plausible scenarios that would explain this. The press might have lied.
    http://www.politicalforum.com/index...s-ever-happened.512081/page-2#post-1067872758

    There might have been an unmanned craft that actually went to the moon and went into lunar orbit.

    The bottom line is that the anomalies show the footage was taken in a studio.
    http://www.politicalforum.com/index...andings-ever-happened.512081/#post-1067871432
     
    Scott, Aug 17, 2017
    #94
  20. Chuck711

    Chuck711 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2017
    Messages:
    3,761
    Likes Received:
    2,371
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It aligns with Trumpy mindset........
     
    Chuck711, Aug 17, 2017
    #95
  21. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,300
    Likes Received:
    849
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If you want to impress thinking people, you have to go into detail and say exactly why you consider them to be wrong and therefore stupid.

    The guy who did this study is a PH.D.
    http://www.apollohoax.net/forum/index.php?topic=1146.0

    Tell us why you think he's stupid.


    This guy seems to be some kind of expert with a lot of experience in his field.

    Lunar rover on the moon. Was it a RC model? (Extended Edition)


    Tell us why you think he's wrong and therefore stupid. Go into detail.


    Here's something about the Australians.

    MoonFaker: Australia & The Conspirators. PART 2

    (5:20 time mark)
     
    Scott, Aug 18, 2017
    #96
  22. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,223
    Likes Received:
    819
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Betamax101, Aug 18, 2017
    #97
  23. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,223
    Likes Received:
    819
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I am amazed that you still keep your 10 year spamming campaign going with no changes. There is no hoax proof, only the observations of very uneducated people and the conclusions of biased, illogical conspiracy theorists. This blog of mine makes your mountain into a pile of lunar dust....

    http://debunking-a-moron.blogspot.co.uk/
     
    Betamax101, Aug 18, 2017
    #98
  24. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,300
    Likes Received:
    849
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The posters who "Tore me apart" had destroyed their credibility a long time ago. Start reading this at post #25.
    http://www.apollohoax.net/forum/index.php?topic=1118.15

    You also agreed with Jay Windley* on the above issue so you are not to be taken seriously.

    You also destroyed your credibility by trying to obfuscate the clear proof that the Chinese spacewalk was faked.
    http://www.apollohoax.net/forum/index.php?topic=1149.0


    *
    http://www.clavius.org/about.html
     
    Scott, Aug 20, 2017
    #99
  25. LeftRightLeft

    LeftRightLeft Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2015
    Messages:
    2,376
    Likes Received:
    1,536
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well that clears one mystery up, if Trumps science advisor says it never happened then it MUST HAVE HAPPENED.. Open and shut case .. next thread..
     
    LeftRightLeft, Aug 20, 2017
    #100
Page 4 of 27

Share This Page