Trump speaks graphically about women in leaked recording

SO!? That doesn't change ONE word of my post :

"""..and then , with Howard Stern, another filthy misogynist, he discussed his own daughter's sexual attractiveness and said how if she wasn't his daughter he'd like to "date " her...only a filthy degenerate would think of his daughter that way and show total disrespect by discussing her with Stern."""

AND,UHDUHHhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh Stern isn't the President....

 

I do not believe your outrage. You have never once argued on the side of morality in this forum that I can remember. Your position is selective, not genuine.

 

So I must've made you look like a fool so now you have to attack me since you can't handle the truth(or the topic)

BTW, I have no outrage, that is all in your mind....maybe because you wallow in it you think everyone else is outraged.......

 

Funny how you don't think Trump lusting after his own daughter is perverted.....telling....

 

Defending Trump's "honor".


It is in his own words!
Sexist pig is too kind.
Debunked in your mind, perhaps, but the recording speaks for itself.

 

I forgot I was talking to a child.

 

I don't like any of that stuff. But 1) Trump was not a President and 2) he was trying to be entertaining. and 3) the original quotes and contexts have been railroaded by progs. Words can hurt, but actions speak louder.
I think Clinton giving his daughter a garter belt is perverted, do you?
I think Clinton sticking his cigar in places he shouldn't is perverted, do you?
I think the fact that Clinton aggressively went after women WHILE President and WHILE in the Oval Office is pretty offensive. Do you?

Your fake purse-lipped morality again.

 

Bill was president and did far worse so don't act like you even care. You're all fake. It was locker room talk and Trump never forced anyone to do it. The left/Trumpets gives Bill a slap on the wrist for raping women (we have proof he payed one off) yet they cry about this.

You all just love to lie. You have no proof and you think if you say "women grabber" a million times everyone will believe it but that does not work. If that was the case then Trump would have lost the election but he won. Nobody believes the BS the left says anymore.

Trump will win again in 2020 if you guys refuse to understand why people voted for him and use "women grabber" to try and get more votes.

Your logic is stupid. Making Trump look bad will not bring back the jobs we have lost or stop abortion or illegals. That is what people care about. You guys just don't get it.

You all are so fake to act like you even care about this. You just want to make Trump look bad. Well Hillary tried that tactic and she lost.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...ropriate-remarks-about-10-year-old-girl-video
10 year old girl going up an esculator:
Trump "You going up the esculator?"
girl "yea"
Trump "can you believe I'm going to be dating her in 10 years time"

Clearly you have no problem with Trump's comments about a 10 year old girl standing right in front of him. BTW dating = wanting sex

 

....And, now that he's President, you are going to see to it that indiscreet statements he made over 11 years ago, in the presence of political enemies that obviously already feared him, are spread as far and thick as possible, irregardless of the effect on public morals or values. You are helping to smatter private conversation revealing how some men actually think about females, but have the good sense to keep private, all over the internet for all to see, including young children.

Additionally, you are ignoring the illegal and malign plans of those who made the recording to use the clandestinely recorded material to smear a possible future rival.

Way to go. Anything goes when it comes to smearing a President that wishes to serve the common people instead of those more advantaged, correct?

 

'But...Hillary'. Typical.

 

'Make America As Dumb As I Am', seems to be his tactic. You would have to be mentally challenged to continue supporting an inept idiot like Trump.

 

I get it. Two wrongs make a right.

 

Would it make any difference if he said it yesterday, or tomorrow? No, it wouldn't, and you would still be saying 'who cares', and making excuses for that execrable individual.

 

You don't worry about Trump's words? Because of Bill Clinton??

 

The weekly scandal which came to nothing, and the alleged 'crimes' which were subject to serious scrutiny, and an investigation which also led nowhere and to no charges being brought?

 

So I must've made you look like a fool so now you have to attack me since you can't handle the truth(or the topic)

 

It doesn't mater that Trump wasn't President then, he subsequently ran and was supported by people who LIKED a man who lusted after his daughter.

He was "being entertaining" ???

At his daughter's expense and humiliation....You LIKE men who entertain by discussing their daughters sexual attractiveness?


NOT surprised a Trump supporter sees nothing wrong with that

The original quotes are there for anyone to google and there is NO proper "context" for a man to discuss his daughters sexual attractiveness.


And it is HILARIOUS that you have to stretch waaaaaaaay back and say, "My guy lusting after his own daughter and me voting for him is fine because Bill Clinton did something once...."""

You are so floundering around trying to defend Trump and his sick degenerate mind AND the fact you knew about his perversion BUT VOTED FOR HIM ANYWAY......why don't you just admit it and be proud of it , afterall you helped this pervert. to become President...

 

,


NO, not "some" men, ONE man, one man who was supported by voters who didn't think total disrespect for women was a big deal.

A man who made comments " irregardless of the effect on public morals or values"".....

but he didn't "keep it private" it was taped and he knew it.

....and "keep it private" ? WHY? IF there was nothing wrong with it as YOU contend then why should it be private?

Funny how you don't think Trump should be responsible for his OWN WORDS...but then he never has been He's so totally Irresponsible.

A. No one knew then that Trump would run for President. Did you think they FORCED him to say those things because they could see into the future ? How ASSinine!

B. Trump KNEW he was being taped.

Trump only , and always, wishes to serve HIMSELF.....

 

You must be talking about both Bimbo Bill and Crooked Hillary Clinton

 

YOU must have no defense of Trump so, of course, have to bring in something that has nothing to do with what Trump says or is....guess some people , like Trump, just cannot accept personal responsibility

 

Trump, while making those vile remarks, was definitely trying to be entertaining by discussing his sexual treatment of women.
I agree with you about Clinton, but this is not about Clinton, is it. Try to be non partisan and put your wife or daughter in Trump's company. That is ok with you? Trust him alone with your wife or daughter?

 

Hilarity's crimes against national security and classified information "came to nothing" because Jimmy Comey (FBI Director until Trump fired his worthless ass) and ex-Atty. General, Loretta Lynch, let her get away with all of it. Does someone as smart as you are really need elaboration?

 

Something has gotten all goofed-up with your post, someone else's post, my post, and, why this is coming up over a year later is puzzling....

I'll make one relevant comment, though, because it is absolutely CRUCIAL that those of you who know nothing about how classified information must (MUST) be handled according to law understand this -- you can't just "take your work home with you" and freely receive classified, create, or relay classified information from ANYWHERE to ANYWHERE else unless the equipment and the systems you use and interface with are properly secured according to rigid, uncompromising, exacting standards that are well-documented and understood by everyone who possesses a Federal Government security clearance.

For a start, Google up "Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility", often simply called a "SCIF". When Hilarity worked 'at home' she did so without bothering to secure her computers, servers, or mobile devices AS REQUIRED BY LAW.

Endgame: Hillary Clinton thought she was above the law. She was right, because those who enforce the law in the United States let her get completely away with BREAKING IT.