Trump under investigation for potential violations of Espionage Act, warrant reveals

That can't be logical. For that to be proven, you will need all those security cameras in and around Mar A Lago showing FBI agents bringing boxes INTO the home, not out of it. But there is none.

Want to know why? If there was ever any evidence of that, Trump and his lawyers would be releasing said tapes that night, after the search was concluded.

The reality is, that the documents were there, at Mar A Lago, where they should not have been. Period. You are using the same type of excuse that accused murderers have used who cannot explain why their fingerprints are on the gun that was used to eliminate a person.

 

No see because there is no answer that makes any sense. Hence why this is a bunch of bullshit political lies and also why they wouldn’t allow his lawyers to be present during the search.

 

You think that those Top Secret files transported themselves into Trump's safe?

 

Just because they took boxes doesn’t mean what you and the politically motivated FBI claim was in them was actually them.
you have no idea what was there and what wasn’t. The only thing you have is the word of the same agency who used a fake dossier WHICH THEY KNEW was fake to justify a warrant on Trumps campaign in an effort to stop his presidency EXACTLY like what they’re doing now.

Everyone said “this can’t just be about documents, they would never raid his house just for that’s”. Well guess what? It was and is and is going to result in an asswhooping on the Dems in the elections the likes of which y’all have never seen.

 

Is there video evidence of them getting them out of the safe and not just being claimed they were there?

 

You never had to have a search warrant, have you? For starters, when a search warrant is conducted, by local, state, or federal law enforcement, the law enforcement agents/police officers will approach and enter the premises, announcing themselves and the reason why they are there. Once that happens, they clear the house, building, etc to secure it to preserve the evidence. The law enforcement agents/police officers will provide a copy of the search warrant to the party/legal representative, or anyone else who is authorized to speak on the behalf of the property listed in the search warrant to be searched. The documents in the search warrant are listed and so forth. Then the agents will search the premises, looking for that evidence. And yes, they search everywhere, as reasonably as possible. The lawyers know this and that is why they don't object to not being present when the search is conducted. That is SOP.

 

Ummmmmmmmmm….you are aware that The Stain and his minions watched the entire raid live on video…??!

 

If you have 11 boxes of evidence being carried out of the house, how else would those documents be planted?

This is the exact same type of argument that 9/11 Truthers tried to do about the government secretly planting bombs in the basement of the World Trade Centers that caused the World Trade Centers to Fall. You will need a lot of people to even attempt to do this sort of thing, in secret, with no papertrail. And that is virtually impossible these days with every cell phone having a camera, security cameras, etc.

 

So you're going to say that Comey's is a bad man.... And then try to pretend that I don't know what he said.

Here's some research for you.... How about you try to prove what he said incorrect?

 

Has Trump claimed that those files were planted in his safe?

 

That’s true. However they were conducting a search on an ex presidents home with LAWYERS present and no one who would mess up the scene. They could have easily allowed them to witness the search and had proof that they did nothing wrong. Since they knew off the gates that this was going to be excessively contentious and wrought with claims of fraud and corruption.

Hell they could have taken video evidence to prove they found the documents where they said they did. How much would you like to bet that video evidence doesn’t exist?

 

https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-suggests-fbi-agents-planting-evidence-mar-lago-raid-1732493

 

Do you also believe that Bill Clinton and lowrider Lynch were talking about grandchildren and golf on the airplane that day?

 

"Suggested"! Typical Trumpism to his supporters to run with it. Did they hide all those boxes under their clothes and no one noticed as they entered?

 

…. No we know they had boxes. But how do you know those boxes contained what they said they contained? Especially given they’ve lied to us before with the EXPRESS PURPOSE of torpedoing trumps election chances.

What makes you think the SAME EXACT GROUP isn’t doing it again?

 

We found some stuff.... But we can't tell you what it is because it's secret..... You're just going to have to trust us...

 

Exactly. Isn’t that just super convenient? He’s got these super extra secret files that he’s stolen but we can’t show them to you or tell you what they are or how he got them. But trust us he had them.

And we can’t tell you why he didn’t destroy or just make copies of the originals after we told him we knew he had them… but just trust us… he had them... IN A BOX MARKED CLASSIFIED just sitting at his house conveniently for us to grab. Trust us. We know it’s crazy he didn’t even try to hide them or lock them down somewhere else. Just left em right there in his house for us to find. Trust us.

Lol give me a freaking break. It’s like they think the entire country is retarded and not just their base.

 

Was that in an email marked Top Secret? Now, back to the question, , what is Trump's reason for specifically taking home selected Top Secret files?

 

It was probably just recipes and things about his social life you know?

 

Oh oh and and we don’t have video of us actually finding these files on his premises… but trust us… that’s where we found them. Of course even if we did have video of it we couldn’t show them to you because these are super extra doubly secret files that y’all aren’t allowed to see. So you’ll just have to trust us. Snotloller

 

Yes, Trump has suggested that in this article. I also think some of his allies on conservative media have also suggested this. And that is why you are getting the types of responses from the loyalist followers who are following the carrot, while blindfolded, off the cliff.

 

After them being out and out exposed totally fabricating the basis for the fisa warrants, one would have to be extremely gullible or simply immersed in their confirmation bias to believe anything these slimy liars say without evidence.

 

No, because that would violate standard operating procedure and give Trump a way out. The FBI won't make it that easy. Try again.

 

I was not proving what he said was incorrect. I was proving what YOU
said was incorrect.

You said he is a Democrat. That is a lie, perjury to me, making you a bad person. You literally said that James Comey was a Democrat and then went on to say what he said about why he didn't charge HRC. Personally, it was a mistake, but at the same time, it was an election year and protocol is to not charge a presidential candidate with a crime unless it was very, very, very, very serious, like quadruple homicide or something similar with tons of evidence to support the allegation. That is an analogy. That is the same rule the GOP used about Trump with 2020 if charges were to be filed.

Now, what Comey said was also to the GOP's advantage because it sowed mistrust in HRC in the 2016 election. That is why Trump won. The last 5% of undecided voters overwhelmingly went to Trump in 2016. That didn't happen in 2020 for the very same reason.

That would be listed in the property receipt of where they found the documents and which agent found them. Preservation of evidence is the key here.

 

You should try reading a little bit slower.

I never said the man was a Democrat.

And if you could stop with your petty little insults and get your anger problem under control that would also be nice. If you keep using your insults I'm going to begin reporting you