1. PF has switched to Xenforo. Please see this post for more details. Search and other functions are still being worked on.
    Dismiss Notice

Truth finally being taught in college

Discussion in '9/11' started by RtWngaFraud, Apr 26, 2012.

  1. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
  2. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    58
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It figures that little Dickie was invited by an old coot with no applicable credentials to teach his trollery to a bunch of spoiled yuppie larvae.

    Maybe they can go out later and play with their blocks together.

    And maybe that vapid twit Hoffman will explain to them how you calibrate the human Mark I eyeball to measure the weight of a dust plume.

    What a clown show.
     
  3. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    39
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You and the rest of the truthers call your flights of fantasy "truth", yet you can't prove your theories, by your own admission you have no evidence to back up your theories, and you can't defend your theories. How does that make it "truth"? Clinically the collective theories of the truthers would be classified as paranoid delusions.

    BTW, how do you justify the kids being allowed to consider the many facets of 9/11 when the only people allowed to speak are the truthers? When you have nobody to defend the truth, liars like the truthers at AE911truth can say whatever they want unchallenged. A good example is the article claims the kids were shown evidence of controlled demolition. Really? Why can't they show the rest of us? Oh right. They pretend opinion is actually evidence and ignore the true facts of the case.
     
  4. BullsLawDan

    BullsLawDan New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    5,724
    Likes Received:
    97
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I have my students study 9/11 every semester for a brief period, as part of a course on criminal law, regarding terrorism. Not one of them has ever come back saying the towers were demolished by explosives.

    Probably because they have more than 4 brain cells to rub together.

    I have a theory that I think any sensible person would agree has just as much credibility as the thought that thousands of people who worked in WTC simply ignored the demolition wiring going on around them, and that hundreds of workers who did the demolition wiring have all remained silent for a decade:

    hulksmashwtc500.jpg
     
  5. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    0
  6. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    0
  7. DDave

    DDave New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yes. Those seemingly intelligent students should also watch this.

    http://www.911myths.com/index.php/WTC_Not_A_Demolition

    And also read this.

    http://www.sawyerhome.net/whatilearned.html

    And decide for themselves which is more credible.

    Because when you get curious and start looking at the truther info, on the surface and because of the misleading way they make their cases, it seems believable at first. It did to me back in September of last year when I first started looking into it.

    But then as I dug deeper and looked at more sources of information it became pretty obvious that the truther theories could not stand up to logical scrutiny of any kind and ARE NOT BACKED UP by physical evidence.
     
  8. NAB

    NAB New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Is this taught as part of the curriculum in the School of Confirmation Bias at St. Marys?
     
  9. Misguided

    Misguided New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2010
    Messages:
    407
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
  10. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0

    Well, the goobment could refute these claims and offer up what "really" happened. We say controlled demolition. We say nanothermite was found. What's the "official" rebuttal? Believe me, if they had one, they'd sure as s*it use it., but, they don't. Anytime, some "official" wants to take to the press, the airwaves, the tv...hey...we'll all be watchin'. Bring it on.They won't do that though, because the speculation and the misinformation continually swirls and keeps the truth smokey, which plays to the criminal's advantage. Best to just say nothing, and so they don't.
    So....we'll step up and teach, if the goobment is not willing to.
     
  11. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Who said anything about wiring??? I believe the nano t was mixed in with the paint, and the crew happily painted it on. They never knew what they were painting on. See how that works? It's called compartmentalization. Happens all the time in the world of espionage.
     
  12. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    How would it be ignited?
     
  13. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    0
    plus mixing the thermite with an inert carrier like paintwould lessen the effectivness......besides,why paint the thermite on,and then spray fire retardant right over it?
     
  14. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    39
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ah. Truther ignorance exposing itself once again. How does nano thermite work? Through heat. The byproduct of any kind of thermite is superheated molten iron. The layer of paint needed to actually do anything would be MASSIVE!!!

    And then let's look at the other falacy of the truther lie of nano thermite paint. Why does nano thermite react better than regular thermite? Because the particles are smaller and the reaction can happen faster. Mix it in paint and guess what you've done. You've completely FUBARed the reaction between the iron oxide and the aluminum no matter HOW small the particles are because the particles are not together. Why else do you think not a single truther has been able to demonstrate nano thermite paint? :lol: Yet despite this evidence they can't refute, truthers will continue to pretend any bull(*)(*)(*)(*) they dream up is what really happened including the fantasy that is nano thermite paint.
     
  15. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    5,109
    Likes Received:
    72
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Heat applied to the iron oxide releases the oxygen from the molecule which is free to bond with the aluminum. The product is iron and aluminum oxide. The overall reaction is exothermic so the heat of the reaction precipitates the release of more oxygen. The reaction continues until the supply of iron oxide is exhausted, or the heat of the reaction dips below the temperature needed to release more oxygen.

    A thin layer of thermite coating a large mass of iron could not maintain the heat of reaction for a significant period of time. The iron, being conductive, would conduct the heat away from the reaction.

    Someone who coated a beam with a paint thin layer of thermite would notice that the reaction would be contained within a short distance of the point of ignition, as the heat of ignition would be rapidly dissipated through the mass of the beam.

    That being said, RWF. Who are these people that painted these beams? Can you located any of them? Who added the thermite to the paint? Who ignited the paint and how was it ignited?
     
  16. DDave

    DDave New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Actually, what I see is called "speculation".

    It happens a lot when there is no evidence to support a claim.
     
  17. BullsLawDan

    BullsLawDan New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    5,724
    Likes Received:
    97
    Trophy Points:
    0
    A person has no responsibility to refute obvious nonsense. Suggesting the government needs to "refute" 9/11 deniers is like saying historians need to "refute" every kook in an asylum that thinks they're Elvis or Napoleon. Everyone who's sane knows they're not really Elvis, and anyone who thinks they are won't listen to reason no matter how you tell them.

    You did, when you suggested "controlled demolition," which requires ignition of some sort.
    And when did this take place? And why has no one come forward to say they "painted" the beams? How were beams painted that were behind walls? How does any substance burn sideways, as would be necessary to shear vertical beams?

    twoofer deflection in 3... 2... 1...
     
  18. jack4freedom

    jack4freedom Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2010
    Messages:
    6,470
    Likes Received:
    97
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Who authorized sending anthrax to US Senators? This poison came from a US military installation....Lot of unanswered questions...
     
  19. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    39
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Really? Seems to me you already think you know the answers. Care to share your evidence?
     
  20. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Why do 'truthers' change the subject when backed into a corner?
     

Share This Page