Two men connected to Giuliani's Ukraine efforts charged with funneling foreign money into US electio

I literally told you in the post that you quoted.

The testimony remains secret because witnesses should not be allowed the opportunity to change their testimony based on what someone else said. But don't worry, it will all get released.

House Democrat says all Ukraine witness transcripts will be released

As for Republicans calling witnesses, who do you think they would call that is actually relevant to the impeachment investigation?

 

Oh stop, you didn’t care about the minority calling witnesses a year ago. Who do they need to call that dems arent?

 

Is Giuliani still crossdressing and dating Trump?

 

Because they do not want agents to be exposed to the public thus they would never be able to work in that field again, remember Valerie Jarrett?

 

What agents? The persons involved here are not field agents or undercover agents they are White House assigned employees who go to work under their own names or State Department. And I think you mean Valerie Plame who got her own self exposed with the little plot she and her husband created to try and discredit the Bush administration. She's lucky she's not in jail on a perjury charge. She also worked at CIA under her own name, drove to work everyday from her house in her own name in a car registered to her own name. That she worked there was not a secret and why a low level State Department employee knew, he had heard in casual discussions as had many in DC.

Republicans have come out of these meetings saying there is NOTHING preventing the release of the transcript and it should have been done in public anyway and that includes the complainer and his sources. Whistleblowers don't get some automatic anonymity.

 

WHOEVER THEY WANT. The Democrats are engaged in secretive attempt at a political coup and you are OK with it, just amazing. How about YOU stop defending them? You didn't care about a presidential candidate being investigated when it was Trump.

 

I asked first how many had to do with the Trump campaign colluding with Russians?

 

If they wanna call whoever they want then they should have won in 2018. You think dems got to call anyone they wanted the 2 years prior??

 

We have open investigations ALL THE TIME and excuse me if I don't trust Schiff to do the right thing. And as for the Republicans not being allowed to call witnesses too you should be outraged.

 

How many of those criminal complaints were squarely within the initial investigation authority of Mueller?

 

Quid pro quo, malfeasance, bribery. Trump is not Russian what crime?

 

I am not in the slightest because I do not think House Republicans would call a single witness that is actually relevant.

Who do you think they would call that would be relevant to the impeachment inquiry?

 

He's not Russian? Coulda fooled me considering that he just gave Russia exactly what they want in Syria, for almost zero cost to Russia.

 

Neither do I, I have no reluctance investigating Giuliani for any involvement in that scheme.

YOU are the one showing the reluctance for the investigation we need into the Biden scheme. Why?

 

That’s the million dollar question

 

I've already heard them say the would, so why aren't you outraged the Democrats are not allowing them same privilege as they are allowing themselves as they hold the proceedings secret so they can selectively leak testimony?

 

Yes do you? Do you understand Trump doesn't need a reason to get rid of an Ambassador?

 

Well, he sure had to get rid of this one. She was wise to the shadow government Trump and Giuliani had set in motion to defraud Ukraine.

 

QPQ to do what? Bribery to do what?
Russia was actively helping the trump campaign, who then hired a guy known to launder Russian money.

 

Oh they said they would? Well then. I do not believe them. Why should I? Who do you think they would call that is relevant?

 

Except he had one, Russian bribes

 

Did republicans allow the same powers in 2017 or 2018?
No of course not lol