Two Men Plead Guilty to Assaulting Law Enforcement Officers During 1/6

Two Men Plead Guilty to Assaulting Law Enforcement Officers During Jan. 6 Capitol Breach
Defendants Sprayed Police Officers with Chemical Agent
https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/...orcement-officers-during-jan-6-capitol-breach

Two New York men pleaded guilty today to assaulting law enforcement officers during the breach of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, which disrupted a joint session of the U.S. Congress that was in the process of ascertaining and counting the electoral votes related to the presidential election.

According to court documents, Cody Mattice, 29, of Greece, New York, and James Phillip Mault, 30, formerly of Brockport, New York, who now resides in Fayetteville, North Carolina, were among those marching to the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6 and attacking law enforcement officers. Mattice carried a video camera and recorded videos of himself, Mault, and others. Enroute to the Capitol, Mattice recorded himself saying, “It’s about to be nuts.”

These two supporters of Donald Trump cried in court on Friday as they were sentenced for their role in the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol as the Wannabe Dictator Donnie Trump continues to grift on the big lie that the 2020 presidential election was stolen from the worst president ever.

Trump said he knew Jan. 6 crowd members had weapons, ex-White House aide testified
https://www.npr.org/2022/06/28/1108...ers-had-weapons-ex-white-house-aide-testified

The Wannabe Dictator Donnie Trump had been forewarned that some of the attendees of his mob on 1/6 crowd could be dangerous to law enforcement but he didn't care as long as he felt the mob was not a threat to him personally. Now, these two convicted criminals will pay the price for the criminality of Crooked Donnie Trump as did some members of law enforcement with their injuries.

 

I am so glad Republicans have such respect for law enforcement, I would have hated to see what they would have done if they didn’t.

 

They were probably beaten until confession

 

So #1: I'm glad these perps are going to get what's coming to them, as their actions were obviously illegal. But #2: I'm not going to bash a political party or even an ideology over 800 people(and it said across 50 States). Some basic division puts that at approximately 16 people(or persons) per state. Is it hard to believe that in our nation of 330+ million, we could find 16 criminals in every state of the union? Nah, not so much to me.

The hyperbole around the riots is 'politically necessary' but as far as historians are truly going to record it, it's not much different from Kent State and other such uncivil uprisings.

 

Dems are routinely bashed based on one comment from an unknown poster in Twitter. Why change now?

 

As do I and anyone that actually places this nation over their political party.

I disagree. If most Republicans and their representatives denounced this and called for justice including facilitating all investigations to find any responsible parties. But they are not doing that — they are doing the opposite. Defending these people in the past, saying it was actually the fault of AntiFa, ignoring evidence and actively pushing back against investigations.

That is why the entire party is capable.

I have no clue here, I do not think at attempt to subvert US democracy as well as the planned events from the administration and what came after is comparable but we will see.

 

That is insane.



Welcome to my ignore list.

 

Harry A. Dunn is one person the Worst President Ever Donnie Trump owes an apology:
Harry A. Dunn, back at work.

I love this building. Love what it represents. Love my ancestors for building it (against their will) I'm honored to be tasked with protecting it. Great day all

 

You saw what happened during the summer of mostly peaceful protests where some cops were murdered and thousands were injured, I won’t even mention how an attempt was made to barricade cops in a building and then set on fire. And I won’t talk about the cops who were ambushed and murdered by the people who think only their lives matter and that happened nationwide over a long period of time. 1/6 was a three hour event with a few hundred people who were mostly peaceful except for a few and if you want to compare that to what the left tolerated and encouraged then I’m game.

The OP mentions just two people, what I mentioned pertains to thousands. Republicans don’t make a habit of condemning police, calling for their deaths and then actually going out and killing them.

 

That has nothing to do with what I wrote or the OP but I thank you for both the deflection as well as the excuses.

Also note: the riots you speak of were not done in the name of a political party — the individuals interviewed mostly didn’t vote as they are anarchists and thieves and despise government. The event from the OP was done in the name of a political party.

Do you support all investigations into arresting these people and prosecuting those that allowed or pushed them to such action?

 

Go ahead and add me while you're at it.

 

The committee has yet to establish a connection between the administration and the rioters, or even those who conspired to riot. Not even the DOJ itself has made that assertion(yet) which is why they're angry at the House for not giving them the transcripts. At this point we can say the committee is 'impeding' the DOJ investigation.

So since such a conspiracy hasn't been laid out, it was a riot. A violent one. Kent State was a violent riot. Shay's rebellion(an actual insurrection against the government) was put down and so forth. In world history, 5 years from now this will not be some illustrative point of historical reference as some liberals believed it to be, it will be taught as an irrelevant foot note.

 

unfortunatly not enough people see things your way

 

proud boys said they were under the impression of following trumps orders

 

Two more useful idiots down while the King's hand are still in the other useful idiots pockets. The low hanging fruit should really only be the beginning.

 

Conveniently left out Roger Stone.

 

BLM is the Democrat party. Find one Democrat politician that has truly denied any connection or support for BLM? Certainly none of them who have control or power.

So yes. BLM rioted for Democrats and Democrats even today after all the corruption revealed, STILL support it and it’s entire lying premise of BS. And they still ignore all the riots, deny them or dismiss them as white supremacists playing dress up. They ignore all questions about the riots, the death, the billions in damage. Or like your talking points, they’re not really Democrats, just anarchists. Yeah, sure. Live in that bubble of a dream world.

So nice try claiming BLM isn’t about party. It’s ALL about the party. There would be no BLM without Democrat support. It only got as large as it did because of all the support. /golf clap though. /golf clap.

With 1/6 those that were actually violent could have been anyone and certainly a tiny minority of the whole. The vast majority were dudes with IPhones or flags. And no one supported the violence or condoned. Kamala was bailing out BLM rioters. Democrat mayors and governors sat back and allowed them to destroy their cities. They let them express their rage instead of arresting them. They let them take over a few city blocks for weeks, while people were raped and murdered. Politicians even supported CHAZ, an actual insurrection. REAL traitors who actually took control of a small portion of a city, installed their own police and phony govt and laws. NOT just a few idiots for a few hours taking selfies.

 

Can you name another time in US history that a presidential administration coordinated with various states to send fraudulent electors to overturn a federal election? Or sitting congressmen are being subpoenaed to testify outside their home states for attempting to interfere with the elections from said state?

 

Those are their beliefs. See, we can't actually criminalize someone for what someone else believes. @MJ Davies did show the statute of using a lie to get someone else to commit a crime, but that statute didn't say "have someone act on something you've never said". Simply, there is no evidence of coordination just because they believed that.

Someone could make a random AmericanNationalist cult and commit random crimes 'on my behalf', but I don't know random x, never spoke with random x and obviously I don't condone what random x did/does.

We need evidence, concrete proof of collaboration and it's not just me asking for it. The DOJ has been asking the committee to cooperate as well.

 

They too were in tears

 

Care to show any of them flying the flag of the DNC or any Democratic politician?

Again, you are confusing people doing something in the name of a political party to advance the goals of that party vs ones you merely associate with a political party, the protesters there were protesting police violence btw — the looters mainly just wanted to steal good. The Republicans were protesting their party losing and the violence was to steal an election.

If you cannot comprehend out how those things differ than I doubt it could be explained to you.

Is that why Republicans have blocked all investigations into these events? I am sure that probably makes complete sense to you. Don’t worry, we are not done.

 

Cool

 

This is a false statement.

 

Who needs evidence when you have feelings and emotions?

 

'SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT"

Any word on the prosecution of those innumerable individuals who assaulted LEOs after a bit of "looting for social justice"?