U.S. judge blocks enforcement of near-total abortion ban in Texas

Well, that's a brilliant argument until (or if) you realize that these bozos were appointed for life....

 

Ya we had to wait a ****ing long time for that one bitch to die. Welcome to how we felt up until last year.

 

ALL of them have ALREADY been DEBUNKED and YOU could NOT "defend" them.

 

The SCrOTUS is NOT infallible.

Dred Scott and Citizens United being two of their WORST rulings of ALL time.

 

lol. And that's why we are done here.

Thanks for playing.

 

Thank you for CONFIRMING that we are DONE with DEBUNKING all of your fallacious "points".

Have a nice day!

 

‘F*** your God,’ leftist protesters yell at pro-life college students.

"They’d never yell that at Muslims, though, because then it would be a hate crime."

https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/480747/

The DNC Convention booed God.

 

Kneejerk DENIALISM given that ALL of your fallacious points were EXPOSED and DEBUNKED.

No point WASTING time DEBUNKING them AGAIN.

 

Posting a list of quotes isn't proof of anything. Each quote you posted would need an explanation on your end as to how it's flawed in logic.

But.

Lol.

You refuse to do that very important part which is why this conversation is done.

Thanks for playing.

 

There isn't a ban on abortion in Texas there's no law that's being presented that would be a ban on abortion in Texas.

It's a civil rights action.

It is simply allowing people to litigate against the type of person that would perform an abortion.

You can still have one they're not banned you can do it right in front of a police officer they can't do anything to you

 

YOU requested a LIST of the things that YOU posted that were INCORRECT.

They were DEBUNKED during the course of the thread.

That YOU refuse to accept that they were DEBUNKED as INCORRECT does NOT alter the FACT that they STILL are INCORRECT and DEBUNKED.

The RECORD of the POSTS stands UNCONTESTED.

No amount of DENIALISM on YOUR part is going to ALTER the record of the posts.

Have a nice day!

 

If a woman NEEDING an abortion CANNOT defend herself AGAINST a frivolous lawsuit then that is a de facto BAN on abortion.

While I appreciate that this abortion BAN is going to cause HARDSHIP for a great many women I can see it MOBILIZING women and their supporters NATIONWIDE to put an END to the Republican's War on Women.

I would NOT like to be on the WRONG side of the LARGEST voting bloc in the nation in the next election.

 

she wouldn't be the one getting sued.

You really should look at this law I'm not saying it's a good law but to understand the difficulty and proceeding with it you should know what it actually says.

If a woman gets an abortion 3 months into her pregnancy she's not the one liable.

the law says nothing about women it's all about civil proceedings generally not involving the person having the abortion.

I don't think women are unanimous on this.

 

The MAJORITY of women are OPPOSED to LOSING their reproductive RIGHTS and that INCLUDES many Republican women.

https://www.npr.org/2021/10/04/1042...-abortion-law-are-not-popular-an-npr-poll-fin

https://thefulcrum.us/voting/texas-abortion-laws

In essence the above indicates that the 2022 Midterms are more likely to have a HIGHER TURNOUT because of the TX abortion law.

Higher midterm turnouts FAVOR the left.

 

Don't care.

We'll see

 

None of those points were debunked...lol

 

Thank you for CONFIRMING your DENIALISM of the record of the posts in this thread.

Have a nice day!

 

Here's one from the list :

YOU posted : """ you say it's not alive"""

...and NO ONE SAID IT WASN'T ALIVE....NO ONE.....and you NEVER proved anyone did ...



Here's another :

YOU posted : ""there is no moral high ground into willfully creating babies only to kill them"

...and YOU never proved anyone does that

 

first example; Life, as in a human life. As in not just tissue. Life. A person...life.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/life
: the ability to grow, change, etc., that separates plants and animals from things like water or rocks

second example; When you seek out the one action that can possibly create babies. A human life separate from the mother that will develop into a full grown adult...KNOWING that you don't want that outcome and will instead elect for abortion. That is EXACTLY what you are doing.

You denying the action yet the action is a reality. Nobody "ooops! how did sperm get inside my vagina?!"

And yes even women who are raped, typically know they were raped. KNOW that pregnancy could be a result. The only out you get is if a woman was drugged and sexually assaulted but even then they wake up knowing they were sexually assaulted.

They have a morning after pill for that. Be responsible.

 

Got anything else?

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
Here's one from the list :

YOU posted : """ you say it's not alive"""

...and NO ONE SAID IT WASN'T ALIVE....NO ONE.....and you NEVER proved anyone did ...

so you were WRONG

Here's another :

YOU posted : ""there is no moral high ground into willfully creating babies only to kill them"

...and YOU never proved anyone does that....so you were WRONG

LOL, now if only you could show how that connects to the contents of the post of mine you quoted....


I do note how, in your last paragraph, you seem to indicate raped women should be punished more severely than any rapist.

 

I think we both know what I mean by life. And how it's importance as something more than just tissue is the thing that gets deniers of pro LIFE (there's that word again) upset.

Which is why you are trying to use a gotcha by suggesting that what is aborted is "alive".

But we certainly know that you will not call it "life" as meaning to be unique and seperate from the mother. As its own unique being.

Your favorite label is zef for crying out loud. Because you are terrified to call it a baby.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
Here's one from the list :

YOU posted : """ you say it's not alive"""

...and NO ONE SAID IT WASN'T ALIVE....NO ONE.....and you NEVER proved anyone did ...

so you were WRONG

Here's another :

YOU posted : ""there is no moral high ground into willfully creating babies only to kill them"

...and YOU never proved anyone does that....so you were WRONG





LOL, now if only you could show how that connects to the contents of the post of mine you quoted....


I do note how, in your last paragraph, you seem to indicate raped women should be punished more severely than any rapist.

No, only you know what you mean and you did NOT use the word "life" YOU used the word ALIVE.

I never suggested that anything aborted is "alive"'...OBVIOUSLY if it's aborted it's DEAD.

There is no "gotcha...YOU STATED """""" you say it's not alive"""

...and now, since you CANNOT prove anyone said that , are trying to squirm away from what you said.

It is a LIVE part of the woman it's in, part of HER body.

I call a ZEF a ZEF because that's what it is...why are you terrified to call it what it is???

Do you refer to teenagers as toddlers? Really!!

 

When I say life. I am not meaning "alive" Tissue is "alive". The issue you have is separating it as it's on unique being separate from the mother. Which it is. It could be a different gender, with a different blood type and it's own unique DNA mapping out the adult it will grow into. That's what it means when we say "life". So unless you want to admit that it is "life" then I guess we are at an impasse.