Unarmed woman is shot by Police in Capitol. The People Who Scream ‘Police Brutality’ Don’t Care.

There's nothing which needs to be proved.

I never argued that Trump was NOT in the wrong. I never argued that he was PERFECT on that day. He was FAR from perfect on that day and throughout his Presidency.

You think that "BOMB" and "DA BOMB" are the same?

 

Yell "BOMB" or yell "DA BOMB?"

 

Read it yourself and decide...

Thanks to Judicial Watch... see Babbitt shooting internal police docs below...
Judicial Watch acquired almost 500 pages of documents from a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit they filed last May.

""JW is a fraudulent source"" I laughed out load... the fake MSM won't go within a country mile of this one..
None of the DerAngriffABCCBSNBCprovdaUtoobPBSCNNMSNBCWaPoTweeterAPNewsVölkischerBeobachterFakebookNYTMMofAVOX Cabal Cartel will/would ever be ABLE to produce these documents... They are to lazy printing what they are being told to print...

The documents show witnesses recount they did not see Babbitt holding a weapon. From Capitol CCTV """"Approximately 2:23:15 (actual time) video captured a number of rioters inside the US
Capitol and further captured Ms. Babbitt climbing up and entering through a broken out
windowpane. Ms. Babbitt does not appear to be carrying anything in her hands."""

https://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/JW-v-DC-Babbitt-October-2021-001710.pdf

https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-releases/babbitt-capitol-jan-6/

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politi...-details-about-ashli-babbitt-shooting-n152396

 

Ah, so you don’t like using the legal system to uncover facts and provide transparency. Interesting.

 

You're unable to argue against the fact that:
100's of predominantly white people assaulting the police resulting in 1 bullet being fired.
And you right wing lot are rather upset that 1 bullet got fired at a white person who let the assault.
While your average black person fleeing from cops gets shot multiple times.
You right wing lot as good as by default support that this happens and pin the blame on the black guy for "resisting".

 

Quoting judicialwatch remains a joke. That source is completely unreliable.
And so what that Babbitt wasn't holding on the a weapon.
She was ordered to stop entering the room by the cops multiple times.
The cops had all the reason to fear Babbitt and friends for physically assaulting the people in that room.
Those people already did that in order to get access inside the building.

You lot certainly would never have any problems when a white woman would shoot and kill a black burglar in her house after a warning.
And indeed. I am calling you lot out over race and gender.

Babbitt and friends assaulted cops to gain access to that building.
That should have led to immediately killing all who assaulted the cops.
But it was one heck of a white privilege theme going on.
Black people get shot for simply fleeing from cops, multiple times.

 

Judicial Watch has a better reputation for providing actual documentation than you do…. Please prove me and/or them wrong.

 

How about the police assaulting the crowd on January 6 that ended up killing a black woman?

 

There is when you make a claim. And you claim he might have meant it an other way.

You're absolutely got a problem with saying Donald played a big roll in the assault on the Capitol, and is partially responsible.

Yup. A bomb, the bomb, da bomb.... it's just childish shenanigans to keep on claiming it only can have 1 meaning.

 

JW is not the legal system.

 

Duh, they use the legal system to force transparency.

 

https://www.politifact.com/personalities/judicial-watch/
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/feb/03/judicial-watch-misinformation-iowa-caucus-voters
https://www.factcheck.org/tag/judicial-watch/
They also made wikipedia.

And this isn't about me. So you know.. personal attack noted from somebody who got hardly anything better to do.

 

In this case... the predominantly white crowed assaulted the cops, and they only shot ones.
While them cops have shot at fleeing black people multiple times.
And your random right wing poster totally supports shooting at fleeing black people.
And now they whine that white people got shot at, ones, when they assaulted cops.

I am pulling the race card. See that I care, that them lot can only complain what it's rightfully called.

 

read post 1887....
and so they are not going for transparency.
It's a right wing fake news site.

 

Left winger fake news and fake fact checkers... nice try...

The subject of your fake fact checkers is....
Iowa Secretary of State Misleading about Accuracy of State’s Registration Rolls
Your fake fact checkers provide no proof what so ever that JW was wrong or did any of they own work to show JW wrong

What Judicial watch claimed was true.... and unlike your fake "fact checkers"... they are backed up with proof and documentation...

"""Judicial Watch’s analysis of Iowa’s state registration rolls is based on official voter registration data provided by Iowa to the federal Election Assistance Commission (EAC) for publication in 2019. Data concerning such registrations must be reported to the EAC by law under federal regulation 11 C.F.R. § 9428.7."""

""""According to Judicial Watch’s analysis of data released by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) in 2019 and the most recent U.S. Census Bureau’s five-year American Community Survey, eight Iowa counties are on the list of 378 counties nationwide that have more voter registrations than citizens living there who are old enough to vote, i.e., counties where registration rates exceed 100%. These 378 counties combined had about 2.5 million registrations over the 100%-registered mark. In Iowa, there are at least 18,658 “extra names” on the voting rolls in the eight counties at issue.""""

https://www.judicialwatch.org/press...ast-18658-extra-names-on-iowa-voting-rolls-2/

https://www.judicialwatch.org/press...-about-accuracy-of-states-registration-rolls/

 

I posted 3 different sources saying JW is a joke, and added that wikipedia is also not so friendly for them. And YOU got no sources saying JW has any kind of good credit. So you know...

 

Prove them wrong and don't tell us what someone else thinks about JW... your post is garbage ans only slanders JW with words while JW is doing the work your
DerAngriffABCCBSNBCprovdaUtoobPBSCNNMSNBCWaPoTweeterAPNewsVölkischerBeobachterFakebookNYTMMofAVOX Cabal Cartel should have covered long before JW does the heavy lifting once again..

I challenge you to prove JW wrong.
""""Iowa Secretary of State Misleading about Accuracy of State’s Registration Rolls"""

 

You did not prove a thing. You gave your opinion.
Does it look like I care about your little opinion?
Go find me a source saying you're right,
or else you default on my sources.

 

"""Judicial Watch’s analysis of Iowa’s state registration rolls is based on official voter registration data provided by Iowa to the federal Election Assistance Commission (EAC) for publication in 2019. Data concerning such registrations must be reported to the EAC by law under federal regulation 11 C.F.R. § 9428.7."""

""""According to Judicial Watch’s analysis of data released by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) in 2019 and the most recent U.S. Census Bureau’s five-year American Community Survey, eight Iowa counties are on the list of 378 counties nationwide that have more voter registrations than citizens living there who are old enough to vote, i.e., counties where registration rates exceed 100%. These 378 counties combined had about 2.5 million registrations over the 100%-registered mark. In Iowa, there are at least 18,658 “extra names” on the voting rolls in the eight counties at issue.""""

https://www.judicialwatch.org/press...ast-18658-extra-names-on-iowa-voting-rolls-2/

https://www.judicialwatch.org/press...-about-accuracy-of-states-registration-rolls/

 

Show me where politifact, guardian or fact check looked into the voter registration data provided by Iowa to the federal Election Assistance Commission (EAC)

 

So you are not aware of the legal system. Interesting.

 

I'm stating a FACT! When someone says something which has more than one meaning, they could mean ANY of them!

Even though I said:

"Bomb" has a meaning which can be found in the dictionary. "DA bomb" is slang. Your airport scenario is UTTERLY RIDICULOUS!

 

Uh no.. I labelled JW a fraudulent source. I posted 3 different sources, and mentioned a 4th. I'm not going into details about all them sources about how they know.... while you produced no source at all stating how they are credible.

 

I am aware it's a right wing fake news site. That is what matters, and I gave 3 sources and mentioned a 4th.

 

“””I'm not going into details about all them sources about how they know..””””” that is because you can’t and they can’t….the truth will prevail…. And your credible source are not credible sources…