Could you give me a quote from that video specifically explaining why he didn't say that in 1996? I don't have 15 minutes to watch a poor quality youtube video.
i've watched it several times before, it's just an attempt to obfuscate not that it really matters that much anymore, ron paul has already lost another election
If you really want to continue discussing this, then make a claim here... http://www.politicalforum.com/elect...ames-b-powell-wrote-newsletters-question.html Otherwise...let's get back on the OP topic..
that doesn't answer any question i asked it's the title of the strategy i realize that when i saw ron paul speak in dallas over 30 years ago, ron asked the attendees to sign up for his newsletters and i did
So you admit that it's a title and not an actual strategy? Nice dodge...you didn't answer the question. Do you really think that Paul physically signed each newsletter?
Well wait why are you going to tell me to go to another thread and then keep going off topic with him?
Back on topic...I agree with you Woogs. The strategy is working and if it comes to a brokered convention...all bets are off for Mitt...
no twister, it's a strategy with a name/title no and i didn't say he physically signed each newsletter most likely what he did was give his signature to be copied the point is that it was his newsletter and he was ultimately in charge i'll bet you ron paul doesn't get nominated by the gop
I know, one of them keeps coming into Ron Paul related threads and squawking "Paul won't win" even when its message is irrelevant to the thread.
some parrots are smart enough to know what they're talking about and you know ron paul won't win, right?
Parrots have evolved mimicry responses as a way to ward off predators and obtain food, much as trolls have evolved irrelevant, obnoxious commentary as a method of gaining attention and feeling relevant. They know what they are talking about, but no one else knows, or cares. Sadly, there's always someone like me around to feed the birds and the trolls, which has the unfortunate effect of attracting more (*)(*)(*)(*) from both.
Santorum HAS endorsed Romney. Santorum's delegates put Romney over the top. By Tampa, Romney will have around 2000 delegates. Paul will once again be comedy relief.
what could be more irrelevant, obnoxious commentary than that supporting a candidate that you know won't win?
I suspect that Dujac was sexually molested by Ron Paul as a teenager and has a grudge against him. Otherwise, how can one understand such a fuming hatred of such an inconsequential person?
he has a point though, you seem to know a lot about a guy that doesn't matter and might as well not exist. if i shared that belief about him, i'd ignore his existence entirely...but you haven't, so why is that?
Ron Paul is finished. He'll be lucky to get a 2pm 15 minute slot at the podium before being escorted out of the convention. His lemmings are already touting their support for the old dimwits son, Rand, who is basically Ron Paul 2.0 Old Ronnie should find himself a nice quiet nursing home and learn how to play horseshoes.
Lol@ ron paul trolls I found this interesting video and think it relevent to this thread http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?deskto...d&feature=player_embedded&v=IojBZhl2z9M&gl=US
You know that Ron Paul is an irrational ineffective who's living in the late 18th century and who's a white supremicist whore, right?
I know, you'd prefer an "effective" whore for the richest men in the land. You don't have to keep repeating it.
No, I prefer someone with rational ideas that can be efficiently and effectively implemented. Paul doesn't come close.
