Video;Israeli mob in ' Death to arabs ' attack

No it is not! I will not label you so and I have never used this in the past.
But to pretend that the Land is Arab is another misnomer when King Solomon of Israel dealt with the king of Tyre "Hiram" used his fleet, used his help in providing lumber... denies your statement any semblance of reality.

The Land of Israel is the Land of the Jews and the NON ISRAELI ARABS have nothing to do in my country... They must leave, they will leave or be forced to leave... We do not want any fifth columnists!

 

the moronic part is to have the document in black and white and the punks cant read that it does partition up palestine, before israel even existed.


http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/un/res181.htm



please note that jeruselem aint israel!

it never has been!

 

zu bubby,

know what et.al. means?

Don't worry, I realize you can't possibly put together a cogent argument and must use the deflection defence. It is generally the last resort of the intellectually bankrupt.

 

And you are an AUTHORITY in what please??????????

 

Historical facts do not bear out your contention.

I'm afraid your own government has acknowledge this with the signing of the Oslo accords and the establishment of the PA.

Given your "feelings", it would appear as though you are saying that the jews also practice a form of taqqiya. Willing to smile, commit to a course of action and then SCREW the infi.... I mean muslims.

 

Well, you who was the one who infered that I get my info from anti-semitic sites. I don't. So f**k you.

 

i can and am able.

by 'every' god!


let me check the torah:

Gen 3:22 And God saith, `Lo, the man was as one of Us, as to the knowledge of good and evil; and now, lest he send forth his hand, and have taken also of the tree of life, and eaten, and lived to the age,' --



yep...... i wanted to see for myself and post it just so you know, what YOUR god said, per YOUr religious doctrine.



i am capable and shutting down the bigots is what i and 'we the people' are all capable of, equally.

Need i mention who the bigots are on this forum?

 

so you don't know what et.al. means. Okay.

Yet another deflection. with every post you prove my point.

thank you for the sentiment, you are too kind. what kind I'm not sure but absolutly too.

 

Yes, it is. You don't like the definition, do you ? Pretty accurate, is it not ?

We'll come back to your statement later, for a laugh.

I'll run it again as a reminder;

Haw haw haw

 

I have reproduced the PREAMBLE and the 28 Articles of the Mandate for Palestine in here for ALL to read. I am sure this will be an eye opener for some, and to all those who still believe that the State of Israel was <created> when in reality it was RECONSTITUTED.



MANDATE FOR PALESTINE

Preamble



The Council of the League of Nations:

Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have agreed, for the purpose of giving effect to the provision of Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations, to entrust to a Mandatory selected by the said powers the administration of the territory of Palestine, which formerly belonged to the Turkish Empire, within such boundaries as may be fixed by them ; and

Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have also agreed that the Mandatory should be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on November 2nd, 1917, by the Government of His Britannic Majesty, and adopted by the said Powers, in favor of the establishment of a national home for the Jewish people, it being clearly understood that nothing should be done which might prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country ; and

Whereas recognition has thereby been given to the historical connection of the Jewish people with Palestine and to the ground for reconstituting their national home in that country ; and



Whereas the principal Allied Powers have selected His Britannic Majesty as the Mandatory for Palestine ; and

Whereas the mandate in respect of Palestine has been formulated in the following terms and submitted to the Council of the League for approval ; and

Whereas His Britannic Majesty has accepted the mandate in respect of Palestine and undertaken to exercise it on behalf of the League of Nations in conformity with the following provisions ; and

Whereas by the afore-mentioned Article 22 (paragraph , it is provided that the degree of authority, control or administration to be exercised by the Mandatory, not having been previously agreed upon by the Members of the League, shall be explicitly defined by the Council of the League of Nations ;

Confirming the said mandate, defines its terms as follows :

 

Israel is not excessively concerned with community decline. They keep building communities and that is called expansion. WE both agree that they are doing it in places they shouldn't, but nevertheless.

Israel is not excessively concerned with their humiliation.

Israel is not excessively concerned with victimhood, they retaliate disproportionately and when compared to the palestinians entrenched victimhood its not even worth mentioning.

I just love your inablity to provide any substance to your arguments.

I suppose to the feeble minded and most definitely to the self absorbed,
simply saying "your wrong" is a sufficient argument but that certainly isn't the intention of a political discussion forum.

 

Well, I'll be nice to you... with all this mumbo jumbo above what does it mean to you?

What does it mean at all to all? Please give me your definition.

 

Resol.# 181 is dead and buried... Now you and I are not going to unearth a dead horse are we?

It stunk to high heaven then it must stink even more now.

 

You falsely accused me of being an anti-semite and now you have falsely accused me of getting my info from an anti-semitic web site ET AL. You are a despicable apologist for Zionist fascism and you have HBendor on your side. How does that feel?

 

Israel is most certainly excessively concerned with community decline. The fascists in its government introduce disgraceful laws designed to protect the Zionist community from decline. They call it ' security '- the same word they use for building repugnant fortifications which are specifically designed to annex territory from inhabitants whose very presence they see as threatening their exclusive community. Dumbkins can see this- why not you ?
Israel is the most paranoid State on earth- second to none. Even the North Koreans do not lash out at their neighbors in periodic displays of military prowess designed to crush any opposition which even hints at humiliating Israel. Zionism itself- a doctrine of ethnic cleansing- is built upon the humiliation of European jews and Israel's supra-aggressive behaviour reflects that humiliation in its paranoia. Zionism's victimhood is what fueled the disgusting doctrine initially and it is still the cornerstone of its recruitment program.
These traits all fit the definition of fascism- and there are many others. Zionism built a fascist platform in Israel and neozionism is parading upon it.

 

That's the substance for you Jonsa but you wilfully ignore it...As moon rightly says, Dumbkins can see it, why not you?

 

I suppose you could call the constant building of communities across the nation as being concerned with decline, but you'd have a hard time convincing anyone with half a brain that that kind of expansion is motivated by excessive concern with declining communities.

The recent law regarding acceptance committees is discriminatory. If I understand you are saying that Israelis implemented this because letting arabs into their communities would facilitate decline. A discriminatory attitude, but absolutely no correlation with fascism.

Yes, they build their west bank communities behind fortifications. We both agree that these settlements are tantamount to land theft. Given the hostility these settlements engender in the arab population, it would seem a logical move to fortify these places.

Why should Israelis be paranoid? I mean after 6 wars, a long list of terror attacks, thousands of rockets fired into their territory, surrounded by 1/4 billion hostile people (see arab opinion polls wrt attitudes towards Israel), a political party in power in Gaza that is committed to the liberation of all of palestine, it seems outrageous that they should be at all concerned with "security".

As for humiliating Israel, I don't think they are overly concerned with that, but they are masters at humiliating the palestinians.

Are you equating genocide with humiliation? Only an ass would consider Israel's aggressive posture a result of humiliation or fear of humiliation. If you were to say that Israel's aggressiveness is rooted in the concept of "NEVER AGAIN", I'd agree, but humiliation? Nonsense.

Now I don't know about you, but I should think that 2,000 years of persecution and genocide might, just might, lead a jew to think they were victims of goyim powers. Again, Israel was created and the jews stopped being victims. I guess they actually meant NEVER AGAIN.

No, the traits do not fit the definition of fascism as I have pointed out. If you have others, then bring them on. Calling Israel a fascist regime has as much validity as calling the arabs Islamofascists.

 

I agree with you and moon, dumbkins do believe it.

If you think that argument is "substance" given its incorrect assumptions, foolish inferences and spurious connections, its no wonder you believe such idiotic propaganda.

I suggest you brush up on your critical thinking skills.
http://www.criticalthinking.net/index.html

 

Now you're agreeing with me. That's because I'm right, Jonsa, and you ain't.
You can keep your provisos and inept qualifications, your ' critical *****ing ' advice too, particularly as you've just had a lesson in it. You're wrong. Neozionst Israel is fascist.

Here's a tad more ' expansion ' for you. Don't b other attempting to analyse it in any terms other than neozionist fascists concerned with the decline of neozionist communities.

What was your suggestion to another member, earlier ? ' Run along and put your wellies on ' , was it ?

 

And the answer is----------------------> We do whatever is needed in OUR COUNTRY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Yours is the epitome of the attitude which will bring the sky down upon neozionism.

 

Hey Jonsa, he's on your side, remember?

 

Can't quite pick up the saracsm I see. Agreeing with your absurd assertion.
Guess you missed the part "anyone with half a brain"..

Yes, thank you for the lesson in "critical *****ing", if that is how you have arrived at your arguments and conclusions, I shall stick to critical thinking and leave the you to plug logic holes with your "*****ing".

Yep only you could possibly equate expansion with decline. You and monkeys, barrels of laughs.

I am constantly amused by those that attempt to pump themselves up with a prematurely ejaculation of victory. A tad insecure in your position? Or merely blindly conceited?

One generally does not start with a conclusion and then attempt to shape the facts and events in support of that conclusion. I realize that its difficult for you but perhaps you can come back to me with some cogent, logical arguments that are not coloured with your prejudices and penchant for propaganda slogans.

 

side?

Ahhh yes of course, I see now.

Pick a position and adamantly and vociferously stick to it regardless of the facts and never ever ever admit your shytte might stink.

What a way to go thru life. You miss so many important lessons and close your mind to so many intriguing ideas and opportunities.

 

he certainly isn't a poster child for tolerance. Fortunately his is in the minority in Israel.