Vindman Escorted From White House After Trump’s Senate Acquittal

Discussion in 'United States' started by Lucifer, Feb 7, 2020.

  1. CourtJester

    CourtJester Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2013
    Messages:
    27,769
    Likes Received:
    4,921
    Trophy Points:
    113
    A distinction without a difference. Still a quid pro quo.
     
  2. CourtJester

    CourtJester Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2013
    Messages:
    27,769
    Likes Received:
    4,921
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Then they would have been equally superfluous in the House. Nice try.
     
    bx4 likes this.
  3. Thought Criminal

    Thought Criminal Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2017
    Messages:
    18,135
    Likes Received:
    13,224
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Over a rumor of what's in the book.
     
    BuckyBadger and MolonLabe2009 like this.
  4. CourtJester

    CourtJester Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2013
    Messages:
    27,769
    Likes Received:
    4,921
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If you eliminate Obamacare you eliminate protection for pre existing conditions. That should be obvious even to the oblivious.
     
  5. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No they didn't.

    Stop pretending like the POTUS was given a fair process.

    It just exposes your narrative.
     
    BuckyBadger likes this.
  6. The Mello Guy

    The Mello Guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Messages:
    110,192
    Likes Received:
    37,918
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yah it was so important to trumps lawyers that they get to question witnesses and call their own, that they made sure that wouldn’t happen lol
     
  7. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Doubling down on exposing the narrative.
     
  8. Thought Criminal

    Thought Criminal Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2017
    Messages:
    18,135
    Likes Received:
    13,224
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The house process was designed to inflict the maximum political damage possible. No balanced information was allowed to be heard.

    Over time, it became obvious that the House process was a sham. By the time the case reached the Senate, people were laughing at it. At that point, calling defense witnesses was pointless.
     
    Last edited: Feb 13, 2020
    BuckyBadger and vman12 like this.
  9. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The Nadler invitation was to a hearing to discuss the "historical and constitutional basis for impeachment" after witnesses were determined by Schiff.

    It wasn't even about charges or witnesses.

    Who did Nadler call?

    Some Constitutional "scholars".

    What were the POTUS' lawyers supposed to ask them regarding witnesses? It was a circle jerk excuse, but even that blew up in their faces.
     
    Thought Criminal likes this.
  10. CourtJester

    CourtJester Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2013
    Messages:
    27,769
    Likes Received:
    4,921
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The idiot Republican balanced information was to call the whistleblower and or the Bidens. Had nothing at all to do with the reasons for impeachment.

    But you are right calling witnesses for the Senate Trial would have been pointless since the Republican’s had already violated their oaths of impartial justice.

    Not to worry though. The truth will continue to come out despite Moscow Mitch’s best efforts.
     
    bx4 likes this.
  11. struth

    struth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Messages:
    33,519
    Likes Received:
    17,956
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sure, but it’s not about saying protections for pre existing conditions is unconstitutional, they can be put in a legal law
     
  12. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The truth is already out.

    Democrats 3+ year attempts to oust a sitting President of the United States has already blown up in your faces.
     
  13. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes because you couldn't replace it with something that also covers pre-existing conditions.

    I mean that takes all of .00000001 seconds to figure out.
     
  14. Thought Criminal

    Thought Criminal Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2017
    Messages:
    18,135
    Likes Received:
    13,224
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Your post is all spin.

    "The idiot Republican balanced information was to call the whistleblower and or the Bidens. Had nothing at all to do with the reasons for impeachment."

    "Idiot" is a baseless smear.

    The assertion that the hoaxblower and Biden have nothing to do with the Ukraine hoax, is comically untrue.

    "But you are right calling witnesses for the Senate Trial would have been pointless since the Republican’s had already violated their oaths of impartial justice."

    More comedy.

    At least the Republicans didn't abuse their powers of office in order to concoct that scam.

    "...Moscow Mitch..."

    Another baseless smear.
     
    Last edited: Feb 13, 2020
    BuckyBadger likes this.
  15. The Mello Guy

    The Mello Guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Messages:
    110,192
    Likes Received:
    37,918
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gop haven’t managed to figure that out yet lol
     
  16. CourtJester

    CourtJester Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2013
    Messages:
    27,769
    Likes Received:
    4,921
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The Republicans have been claiming to have a better plan since Obamacare was passed. And what have they presented? Absolutely zero,zip,nada, nothing. And Of course Trump did promise great healthcare for all Americans in his campaign and what has happened. Again zero,zip,nada.

    Maybe you should try thinking past .0000000001 seconds and then temper your “ thinking” with factual reality.
     
  17. CourtJester

    CourtJester Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2013
    Messages:
    27,769
    Likes Received:
    4,921
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You appear to be unable to prove your Baseless smear accusations. But just for the sake of facts please give us a list of where Trump ever showed any concern about corruption either in foreign countries or in his government.
     
  18. BuckyBadger

    BuckyBadger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2018
    Messages:
    12,354
    Likes Received:
    11,778
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So Schiff didn't do his job and you blame the Senate. lol
     
  19. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So whats your idea, Bernie's "medicare for all"?
     
  20. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Then you can quote the GOP stating they won't cover pre-existing conditions.

    Go ahead.
     
  21. Thought Criminal

    Thought Criminal Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2017
    Messages:
    18,135
    Likes Received:
    13,224
    Trophy Points:
    113
    WUT??!? Are you joking?

    Why bother posting such an easily disproven premise?

    I find it impossible to believe that you have never heard the endlessly repeated phrase: "drain the swamp".
     
  22. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,939
    Likes Received:
    39,414
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    A marked difference and no it wasn't. Next time your quotes right.
     
  23. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    His lying was the felony, witness tampering was the 2nd felony. I didn't set the bar for removal from office.......the Democrats and a handful of Republicans did.
     
    Last edited: Feb 13, 2020
  24. The Mello Guy

    The Mello Guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Messages:
    110,192
    Likes Received:
    37,918
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They are suing to do just that lol
     
  25. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So you can't quote them ever saying they'd take away pre-existing conditions.

    I didn't think so, since they never have.
     
    guavaball likes this.

Share This Page