We don't know

Discussion in 'Science' started by bricklayer, Mar 6, 2019.

  1. bricklayer

    bricklayer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2011
    Messages:
    8,898
    Likes Received:
    2,751
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Please, clean up your writing before you try to clean up the world.
    Why would anyone trust you with the global climate when they can't trust you with a paragraph?
     
    Last edited: Mar 28, 2019
  2. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,147
    Likes Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Oh, another critique with nothing to say. You’d better be perfect. You’ve just opened a pandora’s Box.
     
    Last edited: Mar 29, 2019
  3. tecoyah

    tecoyah Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2008
    Messages:
    28,370
    Likes Received:
    9,297
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Let he without sin, cast the first stone.

    Let he without argument critique for distraction....Uncle Donny would be proud.
     
    Jonsa and HereWeGoAgain like this.
  4. HereWeGoAgain

    HereWeGoAgain Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2016
    Messages:
    27,942
    Likes Received:
    19,979
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Haven't you heard. Construction workers have all the answers and scientists are all idiots.

    AND he stayed at a Holiday Inn last night.
     
    Last edited: Mar 29, 2019
    Jonsa likes this.
  5. robini123

    robini123 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    13,701
    Likes Received:
    1,580
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I trust scientific consensus over partisan politicians. What I like about science is that when objectively applied it can admit when it gets it wrong and then take corrective actions to get on track. As I am not a climate scientist and I do not want to get a degree in the field, I am left to rely upon a consensus within the scientific community. To think that humans have zero impact on climate is to abandon reason.
     
    tecoyah and HereWeGoAgain like this.
  6. bricklayer

    bricklayer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2011
    Messages:
    8,898
    Likes Received:
    2,751
    Trophy Points:
    113
    When you are able to write what you mean, and mean what you write, I'll critique it.
    I do not equate writing what I mean, and meaning what I write, with "perfection".
    By the way, it's Pandora's box not, "pandora's Box".
     
  7. tecoyah

    tecoyah Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2008
    Messages:
    28,370
    Likes Received:
    9,297
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I find it quite interesting, if not telling that you pick through commentary for grammatical error and choose to discuss that instead of a topic that either escapes your understanding or is in some way uncomfortable to discuss rationally or debate with some level of open minded discussion. The very clear signs of climatic disruption take place pretty often and have increased yearly worldwide, yet you wish to focus on your erroneous understanding of CO2 intake by plants and the way people type instead. Basically you do not contribute to debate but rather pick arguments...this is borderline trolling.
     

Share This Page