What Would MuhamMAD do?

Yup I do, I grew up in the Philippines at a time of the Moro-Philippine wars 1970s and I know first hand never trust Muslims. They worship their guns just like they worship Allah.

We don't hate Muslims, Muslims hate us they have it officially written in their Koran "do no tmake friends with Christians and Jews" kill them anywhere you find them"

We Christians are about "love your enemies"

How about you, are you a supporter of Muslim extremism? And do you hate Christians just like Marlowe? I am sure Marlowe hate Christians that's a given.

 

Hopefully Muhammad would NOT do this ...



http://http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2011/07/muhammad-cartoon-comes-to-life-suicide-bomber-hides-bomb-in-turban/

 

Response: And if asked of what proof you have that Muhammad did such acts, it goes to the same bogus logic of "because a book says so", which is clearly false logic. For saying so is not proof that it is so. Furthermore, it is hearsay, while the following challenge provides a hands-on eyewitness account that using force to inspire gather enough followers to conquer a nation is humanly impossible, for any person who attempts to try to conquer and control just 5 without a gun by force will fail to do so and will be defeated themself. Thus if one person can not conquer 5 people without getting beat themselves, then it would be simply illogical to conclude that Muhammad conquered a nation based on such force, including using tactics of robbing caravans and starting wars. Islam was spread peacefully by Muhammad and when the non-muslims saw the new rise in power, they seeked to destroy it, but was instead defeated by the muslims in defense. A hands-on eyewitness account is more credible than your hearsay logic of "it's true because a book says so". Debunked as usual.

 

You are the living proof of the fallacy of Islam base on Mohammed's teaching and what he would have and will do to enforce his fallacy of twisted logic. Hands on eye witnesses have all been murdered only Mohammed's followers were left to spread the fallacy and distortion.

 

Response: Another failed rebuttal. For if asked of what proof you have that Muhammad did such acts, it goes to the same bogus logic of "because a book says so", which is clearly false logic. For saying so is not proof that it is so. Furthermore, it is hearsay, while the following challenge provides a hands-on eyewitness account that using force to inspire gather enough followers to conquer a nation is humanly impossible, for any person who attempts to try to conquer and control just 5 without a gun by force will fail to do so and will be defeated themself. Thus if one person can not conquer 5 people without getting beat themselves, then it would be simply illogical to conclude that Muhammad conquered a nation based on such force, including using tactics of robbing caravans and starting wars. Islam was spread peacefully by Muhammad and when the non-muslims saw the new rise in power, they seeked to destroy it, but was instead defeated by the muslims in defense. A hands-on eyewitness account is more credible than your hearsay logic of "it's true because a book says so". Debunked as usual.

Yet your own Bible says that christianity was spread by the sword and against peace according to Jesus himself:

"Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword." (Matthew 10:34)


"But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me."(Luke 19:27)

 

Muhammed shed much blood spreading Islam. if any Muslim disagrees they are lying. period.

 

The hands on eye witnesses are the ones who wrote the Muslim text called Quran, Sunna and Hadith for you to say and admit that it is bogus is a good sign that you finally slowly but surely is seeing the fallacy of Mohammed and Islam. Nothing is illogical to Mohammed that is why he introduce ISLAM "submit" he demands total submission to his revelations and his twisted logic of truth and God. Mohammed force Arabs to be Muslims and anyone who refuse will break the "peace".

You and many Muslims are the epitome of Mohammed's legacy, following his footsteps of reversing everything that is truth and normal, peace means war, suicide is justified, killing and murdering Christians, Jews and none Muslims are justified no such thing as Muslim sinners.

According to Jesus your Jesus you mean, that was afraid to die just like Mohammed they both send others to die in their place.

Muslims will never admit they lie.

 

Response: Yet we can prove that the Qur'an is the true word of Allah, as the qur'an challenge provides a hands on-eyewitness account that inspiring enough followers to conquer a nation, or just the street you live on, by using human-made speech/literature that goes against what the people want is humanly impossible, because anyone who takes the challenge will fail and not come close to answering it, thus learning first-hand that such an act is humanly impossible. And since it is clearly humanly impossible to use human-made speech/literature to achieve the act, then that means that the Qur'an that Muhammad used to inspire enough followers to conquer a nation was not the invention of any human/s, but from one who has greater power and authority than humans, and that is Allah.

Yet when we look at the bible, we can clearly see that it is not the word or inspired word of God:

Lev.14: 49-53- To clean the house from a plague, sprinkle the house with the blood of dead birds.

Lev.12: 1-5- females are born double polluted than males.

Luke 14:26- You must hate your family to be a disciple of Jesus.

Ephes.5: 22-24- women must submit to their husbands.

Isaiah 7:20 God shaves with a high razor.

2 Samuels 22:11- God rides on a cherub.( Animal with wings or a naked female with wings).

Then it gets even more disgusting.

Ezekiel.16:8 God makes love to a young girl. Verses 16-34, she becomes a whore and 35-42, God punishes her out of jealousy.

You really have to read this part. In 2Samuels 12:2-5, David sleeps with the Wife of Uriah and she conceives a child. Verses 6-13, King David invites Uriah over for a meal and afterwards he sleeps at the door of King David's house.

Now watch this.

Verses 14 - 27, David gives a letter to Uriah to give to Joab. The letter reads that Joab is to put Uriah on the frontline of the hottest battle so he can die. When he dies, he takes Uriah's mourning wife and marries her, and she bares his son. This displeased God.

But wait. I'm not finished yet. It get's even more despicable.

The next chapter, from verse 1-13, God sends Nathan to state to David that HE is displeased by the fact that David abused his authority by having s child with Uriah's wife and then having him killed. But.......God actually forgave David. Instead...............as verses 14- 18 read, God instead kills his newborn child!!

What!!!

2 Samuels 13: 10-14- David's son Amnon rapes his own sister Tamar.

Thus the claim of force only further exposes your ducking and dodging to address the filth in your own bible that proves that it is not the word or inspired word of God. Thanks for the confirmation.

 

Typical but understandable, illogical logic. Thanks you have confirm my claims one again, that Muslims have a twisted logic. You are right Mohammed inspire many to conquer which again confirm that Mohammed and his Islam was and is all about breaking peace with Christians, Jews and none Muslims.

The reason why you can not accept the Bible and God's revelation to Mohammed and kept on corrupting God's words and revelations is because you are a Muslim.

 

If you read the Bible and this is all you get out of it ... you obviously missed the message. +++